Perhaps you are right, but most of the comments are right on the money. Better to be honest than not say anything in the belief that you are being nice, IMO. Hopefully people aren't crushed by the comments.:SNSign:65ShelbyClone said:This forum is harsh.
Usually the harshness is only directed to japcrap and FWD cars, though in this case the Mazda 4-cylinder was enough to set it off65ShelbyClone said:This forum is harsh.
Edbert said:Usually the harshness is only directed to japcrap and FWD cars, though in this case the Mazda 4-cylinder was enough to set it off
1320stang said:No, you wouldn't need a FWD conversion to use a SHO engine in a RWD application. There is a Aerostar tranny that will bolt right up to it, voila, RWD.
How about a 3.8 Super Coupe engine?
turborscapri198 said:(Stock bottom end is capable of 700+ horsepower)
Well, 800 if you're talking about bhp. Don't take my word for it, ask John Dell Blair. Go here where Stinger from turboford.org has more videos hosted. Look at the video on the bottom right titled "2.3TSVOMustangJDBFourced.mpeg."mtbdoc said:351W [old, non-roller] can make some serious hp. Do you really think that 2.3 block can hold 700 hp???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?