• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Overall 4.6 Intake quetion ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweet~Low~93
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2004

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
May 12, 2004
#1
  • May 12, 2004
  • #1
I have a few quetions about the 4.6 intakes-

How does the Aftermarket intakes Flow over Stock ?

swaping intakes do you lose the low end torque or HP /?


It seem like stock 4.6 intakes have Small short runners.. where the aftermarket are much bigger [box type uppers]

more air Volume always better !!??!

thanks-

just a 5.0 guy so far
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
May 12, 2004
#2
  • May 12, 2004
  • #2
There arent any off the shelf intakes for 4.6s. Which intakes are you referring to??
 
B

Ben99GT

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2002
76
0
6
MS Gulf Coast
May 12, 2004
#3
  • May 12, 2004
  • #3
mogs01gt said:
There arent any off the shelf intakes for 4.6s. Which intakes are you referring to??
Click to expand...

What is the SVO, Bullitt, Reichard, and P-51?
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
May 12, 2004
#4
  • May 12, 2004
  • #4
Ben99GT said:
What is the SVO, Bullitt, Reichard, and P-51?
Click to expand...

Evidently, figments of our imaginations.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 12, 2004
#5
  • May 12, 2004
  • #5
sweet~Low~93 said:
I have a few quetions about the 4.6 intakes-

How does the Aftermarket intakes Flow over Stock ?

swaping intakes do you lose the low end torque or HP /?


It seem like stock 4.6 intakes have Small short runners.. where the aftermarket are much bigger [box type uppers]

more air Volume always better !!??!

thanks-

just a 5.0 guy so far
Click to expand...

I'm kinda new to mod motors myself. The SVO intakes are a little better to much better than stock depending on your combination.

There are only 2 after market non-Ford intakes currently that I know of. The P51 and Richhart Racinf. Both are for race applications mostly. They are of the kind of "box type - short runener" design.

I've seen NO flow numbers for any of them.

Stock 4.6 intakes have long runner manifolds just like the ol' 5.0 does.

More air volume is not always better.
 

KaPPaBaLL

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,326
0
0
BAYAREA
May 12, 2004
#6
  • May 12, 2004
  • #6
wait for the C&L
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
May 12, 2004
#7
  • May 12, 2004
  • #7
Ben99GT said:
What is the SVO, Bullitt, Reichard, and P-51?
Click to expand...


SVO and the Bullitt are rip offs and also you cant just go buy on and bolt it on. They also arent that great for N/A but make a nice torque improvement. The p-51 isnt finished yet. The RR isnt made for a low revving motor. They are high RPM intakes.
 

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
May 12, 2004
#8
  • May 12, 2004
  • #8
tjm73 said:
I'm kinda new to mod motors myself. The SVO intakes are a little better to much better than stock depending on your combination.

There are only 2 after market non-Ford intakes currently that I know of. The P51 and Richhart Racinf. Both are for race applications mostly. They are of the kind of "box type - short runener" design.

I've seen NO flow numbers for any of them.

Stock 4.6 intakes have long runner manifolds just like the ol' 5.0 does.

More air volume is not always better.
Click to expand...

yea, most i seem looked more for Race applications. Seen few custom Steel metal intakes for 4.6... blower cars

Would the Cartech Box Upper Intake for 5.0 .. if it was for 4.6 would it work good with small mod motor.. [ported heads,gears, exhaust.]
pic-

http://www.reichardracing.com/holley_upper.php

Why is there nothing out there , Other then Race Applictions ?
$$

here a link to intakes I was talking about-

http://www.reichardracing.com/46liter_intake.php
 
B

Ben99GT

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2002
76
0
6
MS Gulf Coast
May 12, 2004
#9
  • May 12, 2004
  • #9
The P-51 is intended to be an intake that doesn't sacrafice low. As far as powerband is concerned it is more of a Bullitt style intake than the Reichard style. Te P-51 shoudl be fine on an n/a Mustang.

The Bullitt and especially the SVO intakes are expensive but they aren't worthless on an n/a motor as most people think. They without a doubt outperform any of the plenums. Some guys have picked up 2 tenths and 2 mph with the Bullitt intake on n/a motors with no other changes. They don't give big peak gains on an n/a engine but they do make a difference, at certain points above and below the peak they gain 15-20 rwhp over the stock intake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
814
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
723
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
397
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
716
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?