• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Overheating Question = Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RXTbone
  • Start date Start date Apr 21, 2008
R

RXTbone

Member
Mar 30, 2005
49
0
7
Apr 21, 2008
#1
  • Apr 21, 2008
  • #1
I stopped in to pick up a set of electric fan ties today - and got into a conversation with a track guy about Mustangs and overheating. He stated the following - something I've never heard before about overheating:

He said the problem is due to the lower pulley on the 302's were too large (thus operating the water pump too quickly) - the cooling system is so efficient in moving water through the radiator that it actually doesn't have time to cool.

My thoughts are that the system is under constant pressure - and if it's moving fast through the radiator, then it's moving fast through the engine. The only thing you can change is surface volume on the radiator, and air volume over it.

Anyone heard of this track guys "theory"?
 
S

STSFCTN67

Member
Feb 5, 2003
450
0
16
Denver, CO
Apr 21, 2008
#2
  • Apr 21, 2008
  • #2
I have heard of that happening when boneheads take out the thermostats. But you can't make a generalization that all 302's have to large of lower pulleys. Overheating issuse can be so numerous and specific to each application.
 

biggyfan1

Member
Mar 10, 2006
186
1
18
High Desert CA
Apr 21, 2008
#3
  • Apr 21, 2008
  • #3
the water only moves when the stat opens. it might move through the little pin hole that some stats come with but thats not going to make it move to fast. thats what i think
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Apr 24, 2008
#4
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #4
He may or may not be correct, in your specific application. But the theory is definitely correct.
It takes time to get heat out of the coolant. If it passes through the core too quickly, it can't transfer enough heat. An easy way to tell is to compare the tank temperature top versus bottom. Too much flow, and there won't be a large differential. Correct flow for the circumstance, and you can see upwards of 40*F difference in temperature between the two tanks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 25, 2008
#5
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #5
If anything at all, the radiators in the 65-70 Stangs were much too small. And the fans were inefficient. He's wrong.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 25, 2008
#6
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #6
while there is some truth to using a smaller pulley to slow coolant flow through the radiator, but radiator efficiency is also a major factor, as is fan efficiency.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Apr 25, 2008
#7
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #7
Typically if you are stopped and your car is overheating, your fan is the culprit and cannot pull enough air to cool the motor. If you are at speed and your car is overheating, your radiator cannot reject enough heat to keep your motor cool. Granted there is a balance in there but the thermostat should regulate the water flow. There are some water pumps that just don't flow enough at lower rpms(my Milidon didn't on my 5.0) and at a stop the temp would slowly rise. Underdrive pullies don't help either.
Kevin
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 25, 2008
#8
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #8
Thats gotta be pretty tuff to do with a stock thermostat. I highly doubt turning your waterpump a tad faster on a mustang is going to effect much as to cooling as long as the stat is there.

I would say the #1 reason they over heat is the lack of a fan shroud. How many Mustangs do ya see with shrouds on them.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Apr 25, 2008
#9
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #9
Your gut fealing is correct (sorry 66Runt).

The speed in which the coolant moves through the cooling system has very little effect on cooling system efficiency.

Often you hear people say "The coolant doesn't have time to cool down in the radiator". By that same logic "The coolant doesn't have time to get hot in the engine".

Cooling system efficiency is a direct result of 4 factors:
- temperature difference between ambient temp and coolant temp
- surface area of radiator
- efficiency of radiator (fin design, material, etc)
- amount of airflow through the radiator.

Clearly you can see that the circulation speed will not effect any of these factors.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Apr 25, 2008
#10
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #10
Actually you're incorrect 70 bottle fed.
The temperature differential between the cylinder bores, heads and coolant passages is far greater than the air-tube-water correlation. Heat saturation is dependant on pressure, and absorbtion slows as it reaches that peak.
I've spent a lot of time with this issue working for a manufacturer. There is a lot of engineering calculations to get the proper flow rates.
The key is to get enough flow to create turbulence, without creating so much turbulence that you restrict flow.
 
H

henry_v

New Member
Dec 27, 2005
13
0
1
Apr 25, 2008
#11
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #11
Engine Cooling Tech

I believe the idea is to move the water at a high enough pressure at a great enough velocity through an efficient enough heat exchanger and expose it to a great enough (and cool enough) air flow. The use of a surge tank and/or swirl pot may be of advantage.

Check out tech from the Corner-Carvers Forum:
http://corner-carvers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34424&highlight=thermodynamics

Good luck,
Henry V
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Apr 26, 2008
#12
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #12
Didn't read any reponses, but BS on that comment. It is theorectically possible but not common to these engines: in fact, I have never had an overheating problem with any 302/351W enigine, no matter what cam/head combo as long as I used a stock rad. and shroud combo.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Apr 26, 2008
#13
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #13
henry_v said:
I believe the idea is to move the water at a high enough pressure at a great enough velocity through an efficient enough heat exchanger and expose it to a great enough (and cool enough) air flow. The use of a surge tank and/or swirl pot may be of advantage.

Check out tech from the Corner-Carvers Forum:
http://corner-carvers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34424&highlight=thermodynamics

Good luck,
Henry V
Click to expand...

Be careful Henry. This is a 'Stang forum and can be tech adverse.

Y'all ought to check out Henry's car.
 
H

henry_v

New Member
Dec 27, 2005
13
0
1
Apr 27, 2008
#14
  • Apr 27, 2008
  • #14
All Cooling Myths Dispelled

RXTbone,

Here is your answer, rather tech heavy:
http://www.corner-carvers.com/forums/showpost.php?p=343405&postcount=36

Henry V
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/703052
 
C

c24sc

New Member
Jan 1, 2008
114
0
0
Apr 28, 2008
#15
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #15
my 68 302 in my 66 was overheating. Tested water pump, flushed block, new lower hose, installed new electric fan, new lower thermostat and replaced read cap. Still didn't fix the problem. The rad looked didnt leak and looked good, but I replaced it and that fixed the problem. I must have had a lot of corrossion inside that was too tough to clean when flushing. Just used a new thicker stock brass replacement. cool as a clam now.

nate
 

carefact0rzero

Member
Mar 17, 2008
49
0
7
columbia, sc
Apr 28, 2008
#16
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #16
i fought mine for at least two years... it'd run fine for a month then start overheating again. it'd go away and come back. i changed everything, water pump, radiatior (stock style), thermostat, the housing, heater core, hoses... everything. then i just got pissed and got what must be an 9 foot thick fluidyne aluminum radiator. works like a freakin' charm. only problem i have now is it runs too damn cool, no heat in the winter! gotta figure that one out now
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 29, 2008
#17
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #17
ForceFed70 said:
Your gut fealing is correct (sorry 66Runt).

The speed in which the coolant moves through the cooling system has very little effect on cooling system efficiency.

Often you hear people say "The coolant doesn't have time to cool down in the radiator". By that same logic "The coolant doesn't have time to get hot in the engine".

Cooling system efficiency is a direct result of 4 factors:
- temperature difference between ambient temp and coolant temp
- surface area of radiator
- efficiency of radiator (fin design, material, etc)
- amount of airflow through the radiator.

Clearly you can see that the circulation speed will not effect any of these factors.
Click to expand...
Yes, that is well said.

It is not true that water can move too fast through the cooling system and thus not cool the engine.
 
0

01ragtop

Member
May 20, 2004
88
0
7
San Diego
Apr 29, 2008
#18
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #18
henry_v said:
RXTbone,

Here is your answer, rather tech heavy:
http://www.corner-carvers.com/forums/showpost.php?p=343405&postcount=36

Henry V
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/703052
Click to expand...

+1 on the tech, and

Awesome car Henry!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
269
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
616
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
Help! Intake Manifold Gasket or Head Gasket?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
95 Laser GT Ver
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?