• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

P&P PIheadswap E.T.?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sick96Stang
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#1
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #1
The Port and Polished PI headswap is almost done what kind of times you think I will run after this? Current best with mods in my sig is 14.4 @ 95. Also doing some DR's and 4.10's after this you think I will be seeing 12's with this setup?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2004
#2
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #2
Not without the PI intake upgrade as well as a higher flow upper manifold and T/B. Even then, I wouldn't think much more than mid/low-13's are going to be the norm with just that set up.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#3
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #3
I'm getting the entire PI headswap meaning the heads, cams, and intake.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2004
#4
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #4
Even so, I still don't see you making any more than about 240-245rwhp. Gonna need more jam than that to crack the 12's.
 
A

AcE XBOX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
144
0
0
Dec 28, 2004
#5
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #5
Wont the higher compression help?
 
B

billyfe390

New Member
Aug 18, 2003
573
0
0
Dec 28, 2004
#6
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #6
Depends totally on what the car weighs and what the weither is like.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#7
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #7
Gearbanger 101 said:
Even so, I still don't see you making any more than about 240-245rwhp. Gonna need more jam than that to crack the 12's.
Click to expand...

So you think with a Port and Polished PI headswap meaning heads, cams, and intake I will only gain 30-35 rwhp????
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#8
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #8
billyfe390 said:
Depends totally on what the car weighs and what the weither is like.
Click to expand...

Well my car is the 248A package which is basically a stripped down GT so my car weights less than the average GT. I'm just wondering if with the P&P PI headswap, DR's and 4.10's if I will be able to make 12's.
 
N

Nredgt98

New Member
Dec 12, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 28, 2004
#9
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #9
You will have a lot more than 240-245 hp. Especially if your heads are P&P. I have a 98 gt with a PI head swap(unported) , intake, Ford racing shorty headers, off road H, ported upper plenum, 70mm tb, cold air,3.73's, 40 series mufflers, after market cams from comp cams. Mine dynoed at 276.8 hp/312rq untuned. With the stock cams it dynoed at 259 hp. If your setup is anywhere near mine then you can expect near the same and if the heads are ported then you'll have more. You will lose a little on the low end with the port job but you have great top end.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2004
#10
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #10
Sick96Stang said:
So you think with a Port and Polished PI headswap meaning heads, cams, and intake I will only gain 30-35 rwhp????
Click to expand...
Sorry, I overlooked the fact that you've got a P&P done to your PI's, so lets put it this way.....a stock '99-up makes around 225-235rwhp. So, say another 15-20hp for the P&P and added compression and another 10-15 for the intake/exhaust mods and tune. Probably in the range of 260-270rwhp, but still doubtful you'll see 12's.

I personally think the best you'll muster with just those bolt ons, D/R's and 4.10's is low-13's, but hey anything is possible.
 
N

Nredgt98

New Member
Dec 12, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 28, 2004
#11
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #11
You have to remember that you wont have the compression factor. It would have been about 10 to1 with the smaller combustion chambers. But if you have ported heads the ratio will drop. Because of the of the lower compression you have the option of supercharging your engine which you cant do with high compression
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2004
#12
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #12
Nredgt98 said:
You have to remember that you wont have the compression factor. It would have been about 10 to1 with the smaller combustion chambers. But if you have ported heads the ratio will drop. Because of the of the lower compression you have the option of supercharging your engine which you cant do with high compression
Click to expand...
Going to PI heads on a ’96-’98 Modular engine usually brings compression to a minimum of 10.1:1. More often than not, the numbers hover right around 10.4:1. Porting doesn’t normally include altering the combustions chambers volume. It’s usually nothing more than enlarging and reshaping the intake an exhaust runners, while blending them into the port pockets around the valve guide. Some will clean the combustion chamber up a little around the area where the valve meets the seats, to improve low-lift flow and reduce shrouding. But as a rule, most places won’t alter the combustion chambers at all unless specified. I'd image this would be his case and as such, his CR would remain within the 10.1-10.4 range.

Regardless, porting the chambers themselves has a less dramatic effect on volume that you may think. In doing so, only the swirl dams are removed to increase overall flow (reduce shrouding) and increase flame propaganda within the chamber itself. Although this does allow an increase in upper limits of flow, increasing horsepower, it has a negative effect on overall efficiency and effects low-end torque…not to mention fuel economy takes a nosedive. Regardless, even if he did have the swirl dams removed, the compression would drop by no more than a few cc’s at most. A guy on tccoa.com had his done and it still resulted in a near 10:1 ratio….which is still a full point higher than stock.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#13
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #13
Gearbanger 101 said:
Going to PI heads on a ’96-’98 Modular engine usually brings compression to a minimum of 10.1:1. More often than not, the numbers hover right around 10.4:1. Porting doesn’t normally include altering the combustions chambers volume. It’s usually nothing more than enlarging and reshaping the intake an exhaust runners, while blending them into the port pockets around the valve guide. Some will clean the combustion chamber up a little around the area where the valve meets the seats, to improve low-lift flow and reduce shrouding. But as a rule, most places won’t alter the combustion chambers at all unless specified. I'd image this would be his case and as such, his CR would remain within the 10.1-10.4 range.

Regardless, porting the chambers themselves has a less dramatic effect on volume that you may think. In doing so, only the swirl dams are removed to increase overall flow (reduce shrouding) and increase flame propaganda within the chamber itself. Although this does allow an increase in upper limits of flow, increasing horsepower, it has a negative effect on overall efficiency and effects low-end torque…not to mention fuel economy takes a nosedive. Regardless, even if he did have the swirl dams removed, the compression would drop by no more than a few cc’s at most. A guy on tccoa.com had his done and it still resulted in a near 10:1 ratio….which is still a full point higher than stock.
Click to expand...

Its a friend of mine who is doing the P&P. I just want to make sure I am able to run boost. He is grinding out the swirl dams I know that much. Should I ask him to alter the combustion chambers or can I run boost on 10.1 - 10.4 CR?

So with the P&P PI heads and him grinding out the swirl dams is my MPG gonna take a nosedive?
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Dec 28, 2004
#14
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #14
My guess with the way my car reacted, and I had long tubes and a prochamber installed at the same time, is that you will pick up close to a second. I would think around mid to low 13's. I really don't think you'll hit 12's until you get cams.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#15
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #15
TweekedGT said:
My guess with the way my car reacted, and I had long tubes and a prochamber installed at the same time, is that you will pick up close to a second. I would think around mid to low 13's. I really don't think you'll hit 12's until you get cams.
Click to expand...

Hmmm I'm hoping to hit 13.5 after the P&P PI headswap then after the DR's and 4.10's I'm gonna try for 12's. If I can hit 13.5 I dont see why DR's and 4.10's wouldnt be able to shave off .5-.6.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2004
#16
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #16
Sick96Stang said:
So with the P&P PI heads and him grinding out the swirl dams is my MPG gonna take a nosedive?
Click to expand...
In a word....yes. I wouldn't knock the swirl dams off if I were you. It's a real art to properly CC a set of combustion chambers and is best let to the hands of a skilled professional or a CNC machine. If you want to lower compression, the only way to do it is with the pistons. Yeah, you could knock it down a little by taking off the dams, but not enough for your purposes. Not to mention, the stock slugs suck anyway, so you may as well pony up the money and replace them to do it right. Besides, 10.1-10.4 isn't ideal for running boost, but not impossible. You'll have to be dead on with your tune, while generous with the fuel and conservative with the timing. You would however be better off filling the block with a set of 19cc pistons and beefed up rods. If not for drivability, then for longevity sake.
 
M

matsm21

New Member
Sep 5, 2003
241
0
0
Long Island
Dec 28, 2004
#17
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #17
I would check into some of the other guys around here with a p&p headswap and cams and boltons. a few of them are around 290, some higher.
*edit* I don't know about e.t.'s though. that depends on you!
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Dec 28, 2004
#18
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #18
Sick96Stang said:
Hmmm I'm hoping to hit 13.5 after the P&P PI headswap then after the DR's and 4.10's I'm gonna try for 12's. If I can hit 13.5 I dont see why DR's and 4.10's wouldnt be able to shave off .5-.6.
Click to expand...
I don't think you'll pick up 1.5 seconds with just those mods. That is an absolute pile of time. I could be wrong. I'm guessing 1-1.2 seconds with all of those mods. You'll just have to run her and tell us how you did. I'm curious to see how it goes.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Dec 28, 2004
#19
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #19
TweekedGT said:
I don't think you'll pick up 1.5 seconds with just those mods. That is an absolute pile of time. I could be wrong. I'm guessing 1-1.2 seconds with all of those mods. You'll just have to run her and tell us how you did. I'm curious to see how it goes.
Click to expand...

Yea, the port and polishing and PI headswap should be all done by the end of January so I still got a month or so.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 28, 2004
#20
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #20
I am going to say low to mid 13's.
Congrats also!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
438
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2026
General karthief
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
668
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Help with AFR reading
  • dz01
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
542
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
365
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?