Photographers get in here!!

90mustang_GT5.0 said:
my dad payed almost 3k for his set up.. hes using a cannon! i cant really show you how clear it is because i always have to shrink and take away from the pic's that i post!
if i had it to do over again i would buy a nikon or a canon but i have and olympus and thats what i have to keep for a while:shrug:

so that is why im now looking for the next best thing as in lenses


i love the camera it works great and takes awsome pics but i want to take pictures at the races at night and the lens to do it is almost $500
 
I've never seen an adapter to fit Nikon or Canon lenses on an Olympus, but they do make an adapter so that you can use the older Oly OM-series lenses that you can find for really reasonable prices. What I did was buy one of these. I then sold my original kit lense for just over $100 on eBay and made out like a bandit. The 14-54 is a great low-light lense.
 
PoopDawg said:
If your camera is a DSLR, the lenses should be interchangeable. If not, then no. DSLR's are $900+ camera's, and some well over $5,000. Got a link to the camera?
His camera is a DSLR but is only interchangeable with Olympis, or other aftermarket lenses. As for putting a Canon or Nikon on your cam, I do not know of anything out there to do that.

Sigma may have some nice lenses out now for it check out there web site.

I myself shoot Canon DSLR and will never own anything else.

Sony's new 10.2 MP DSLR is very tempting espically with the Carl Zeiss lens and the ability to use and Konica/Minolta lens with it.

I say sell the E-Volt and grab an Entry level (Rebel XT/XTi, D50,) from one of the big names in the game.
 
Gixxer750 said:
His camera is a DSLR but is only interchangeable with Olympis, or other aftermarket lenses. As for putting a Canon or Nikon on your cam, I do not know of anything out there to do that.

Sigma may have some nice lenses out now for it check out there web site.

I myself shoot Canon DSLR and will never own anything else.

Sony's new 10.2 MP DSLR is very tempting espically with the Carl Zeiss lens and the ability to use and Konica/Minolta lens with it.

I say sell the E-Volt and grab an Entry level (Rebel XT/XTi, D50,) from one of the big names in the game.
how much do you think its worth if i sell it?

i just bought it a few months ago:shrug:
 
Well not sure what you paid for it new, and I am used to Cnd currency so my prices will always be higher. BUt I presume you got the dual lens kit?

If I was to sell it I would aim for the $600-$650 CND mark. So what ever that turns out to be in US currency. I would think you could get $500 out of it easy.

But before you do sell, check out what lenses are available for it you may be more then happy with a new lens or two. www.popphoto.com has a great forum, and reader gallery, tons of tips, articles, camera comparisons etc. They may be able to give you some good guidance and check out the classifieds on there and see what an E-Volt is going for.

If you do decide to buy new, I recomend the Rebel XTi getting awesome reviews, 10 MP, Canon quality, hundreds of lenses and accessories for it.

Or perhaps a 20d or if you have lots of extra cash sitting around a 5d :D
 
Gixxer750 said:
Well not sure what you paid for it new, and I am used to Cnd currency so my prices will always be higher. BUt I presume you got the dual lens kit?

If I was to sell it I would aim for the $600-$650 CND mark. So what ever that turns out to be in US currency. I would think you could get $500 out of it easy.

But before you do sell, check out what lenses are available for it you may be more then happy with a new lens or two. www.popphoto.com has a great forum, and reader gallery, tons of tips, articles, camera comparisons etc. They may be able to give you some good guidance and check out the classifieds on there and see what an E-Volt is going for.

If you do decide to buy new, I recomend the Rebel XTi getting awesome reviews, 10 MP, Canon quality, hundreds of lenses and accessories for it.

Or perhaps a 20d or if you have lots of extra cash sitting around a 5d :D
one reason i didnt buy a canon is that it felt cheap. and the olympus is a solid camera but the lenses are very expensive
i looked at a few nikons since and really liked them in every way but i made a mistake since i had no clue what i was doing at the time but now a few months later i have used it alot and now decided to buy new lenses and they are expensive so i started looking for other solutions so i can price differences.


i just cant justify buying a new set up till this one makes me some money.
 
I know exactly what you mean by they feel cheap (but it was made to be light for a reason not to be cheap). But you’re talking entry-level camera like a Rebel or rebel XT. Now I shoot with an XT and have beat the hell out of the thing and had it get soaking wet, still wipes up and looks brand new. I will never doubt the design of the Camera again after last years hunting adventures with it.

Now if you up to a 20d with full metal body you get the rugged feel but double the weight.

Nikon are very nice, I tried out the D50 and D70 when I was looking into my new DSLR, but after reading reviews and stuff on the XT and the Nikons the XT won out in justa bout every category from all the major reviewers, and has a higher MP.

making money is the fun part I pulled in about $4000 this summer from Weddings alone. Got some family portraits I am doing this weekend. Nothing like one day of picture taking 3 days of post processing and $1000 cash in ur hand.
 
Gixxer750 said:
I know exactly what you mean by they feel cheap (but it was made to be light for a reason not to be cheap). But you’re talking entry-level camera like a Rebel or rebel XT. Now I shoot with an XT and have beat the hell out of the thing and had it get soaking wet, still wipes up and looks brand new. I will never doubt the design of the Camera again after last years hunting adventures with it.

Now if you up to a 20d with full metal body you get the rugged feel but double the weight.

Nikon are very nice, I tried out the D50 and D70 when I was looking into my new DSLR, but after reading reviews and stuff on the XT and the Nikons the XT won out in justa bout every category from all the major reviewers, and has a higher MP.

making money is the fun part I pulled in about $4000 this summer from Weddings alone. Got some family portraits I am doing this weekend. Nothing like one day of picture taking 3 days of post processing and $1000 cash in ur hand.
how hard are weddings to do?:shrug:


i prefer to take pics of cars. but i would look other places to make the money. i thought about the weddings and have been asked about it but i dont want to be responsible for screwing up someones wedding pictures by accident. i am pretty sure i can do it but its a risk i would think.

i may have a couple of jobs lined up to take pics of race cars for a few people.
 
If you have decent PS skills weddings are great. Now you have to get used to shooting in different lighting conditions and setting up custom Wb on your cam, but that all comes from using it.

My first wedding I did they had paid a pro to come do it and I took shots along side of him, mine turned out better then his did and at that point I knew i was ready to do it on my own.
 
68torinogt said:
how hard are weddings to do?:shrug:

i prefer to take pics of cars. but i would look other places to make the money. i thought about the weddings and have been asked about it but i dont want to be responsible for screwing up someones wedding pictures by accident. i am pretty sure i can do it but its a risk i would think.

If you don't mind a differing opinion, I'll toss this out to you...

Shooting weddings can be a great way to make a living, or really supplement your income; my father was a pro for 45 years, and weddings were his bread and butter. The first thing to consider is most weddings are in the spring and summer, so be prepared to spend most of your Saturdays, and some Sundays, working. If you're not already, you need to learn how to be an assertive person - not agressive, but assertive. You don't stand there waiting for the shot, but you make the shot happen. You put the happy couple in the best poses, in the best light, in front of the best background - in other words, they're your models. Weddings are kind of a cookie cutter affair, so far as they come into the church, do the ceremony, leave the church, do a receiving line, then reception, etc. Map all of this out beforehand, and know the who, what, when, etc., for the entire job before you ever show up. Don't worry about Aunt Ida and Uncle Elmo sitting there getting tanked, your focus is on the couple and the wedding party. Buy a case of disposable cameras to put out on the tables, and let the guests take all of the candid shots themselves.

So far as the mechanics of shooting weddings, the first thing is, you need a second camera outfit. If you have one camera, and it fails, not only are you out of business, the entire job just went down the drain, you get paid nothing, and your rep just went down the toilet. So, you need to buy a second of everything - camera, lenses, flashes, batteries, and on and on, and have it ready to go immediately if need be.

Finally, and I'll put my flame suit on now, consider ditching the digital, and shoot on film, using both 35mm and medium format cameras. The extra expense (to the bride and groom) is an easy sell - properly processed and stored, negatives will outlive both of them, and can be passed down for generations to come, regardless of what happens to a print. What are they going to do with a CD or memory stick in 50 years? Where you make extra money is on prints for the couple, and then their family and friends. You can buy used, mint condition film equipment for a fraction of the price of digital, and use something like the Nikon F fully manual as your backup. If you really want to crank up the profit margin, darkroom equipment, all the way from developer tanks to enlargers can be found for pennies on the dollar, and you can do your own processing and prints.

I know this is kind of a broad brush at what's involved, but maybe it's something to consider...

Jerry
 
Excellent reply Jerry. I agree on everything and should have been a bit more clear in my wedding details. You are correct about knowing the poses, and making the shots happen. I visit the site where I will be taking the wedding pics a few days in advance and walk around to see where the best shots will be. Making sure to not have clutter in the back ground. ir telephone poles, houses, cars etc.

I also make a list given to me from the Bride and Groom of people they will like to have pictures of and on the day I call out the names and get people lining up.

On your 35mm comment, no flame suit needed. 35mm is just as good as a Digital, I have a 35mm canon AE-1 with every lens imaginable for my old school back up, but would never consider shooting with it for my primary.

Digital is easier to work with easier to post process, easier to do b&w conversions, panoramas etc. Not to mention I take a lap top with me and every wedding I have shot digital I have taken no less then 1200 pictures from start to finsih and upload them to the laptop to clear my card and still be able to shoot in full size or RAW. yes lots of Pics to go through, but the bride and groom truly feel they got what they paid for when they have that many poses to choose from. I also sing all rights to any pictures I took that day over to them which is something most do not do.