• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

PI Cam swap suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 281cammer
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2008

281cammer

Member
Oct 6, 2006
34
0
6
Jun 12, 2008
#1
  • Jun 12, 2008
  • #1
I actually need 2 cam suggestions

1.- Buddy has a 03 GT wants to do a aggressive(sounding) cam in his GT. He will be doing a blower install shortly. What would be a good recommended cam for his car where he won't have PTV issues.

2.- Here's the trickery one. Another Buddy has a 98 GT PI swapped car. He went to local shop today and they told him that there wasn't any aftermarket cams available for his car that wouldn't give him PTV issues. Which I could understand being Pi swapped cars have 10.1 C/R so the smaller CC lead to PTV issues I'm sure

I greatly appreciate any help received
Steve
__________________
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jun 12, 2008
#2
  • Jun 12, 2008
  • #2
1. He shouldn't be doing cams for the sound, that's kinda sad. But at any rate he should be getting blower cams, stage I or II - all blower cams sounds a little less "lopey" than their equal stage NA cams.

2. That's BS. He can use comp cam xe268H's which are a NPI cam, or comp cam xe262AH's or CMS Stage I N/A cams (what i chose) which are both stage one PI cams. Crower and Crane are also choices. Those in a stage II might even fit just fine when degreed properaly. And it's the piston's dish that's the problem, not the head volume.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Jun 12, 2008
#3
  • Jun 12, 2008
  • #3
I have a PI swapped '96 with Comp 262AH cams and it runs great. That guy that told you it can't be done is an idiot.
 

281cammer

Member
Oct 6, 2006
34
0
6
Jun 12, 2008
#4
  • Jun 12, 2008
  • #4
We'll when I say for sound he wants power from them too, he just wanted something with a good lope to it. Like we all do.
 
W

Will Smith

New Member
Aug 8, 2004
191
0
0
Cape Coral, FL
Jun 14, 2008
#5
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #5
most of these guys hit it right on the money... the NPI cams have a .500 lift and shouldnt be a problem when degreed in. so any choice there should be ok... the PI cams have a .550 lift and u might run into PTV issues with that but maybe a stage 1 like said above when degreed in will work...

just remember what every cam he chooses he need to have the support mods to handle it... YOU CAN "OVER CAM" A CAR
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jun 14, 2008
#6
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #6
Will Smith said:
most of these guys hit it right on the money... the NPI cams have a .500 lift and shouldnt be a problem when degreed in. so any choice there should be ok... the PI cams have a .550 lift and u might run into PTV issues with that but maybe a stage 1 like said above when degreed in will work...

just remember what every cam he chooses he need to have the support mods to handle it... YOU CAN "OVER CAM" A CAR
Click to expand...
+1, i see more threads about people installing stage II/III's with problems or little gains than i see threads of people loving their new cams.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 14, 2008
#7
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #7
Will Smith - Peak lift has NOTHING to do with piston to valve clearance.
 
W

Will Smith

New Member
Aug 8, 2004
191
0
0
Cape Coral, FL
Jun 14, 2008
#8
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #8
5spd GT said:
Will Smith - Peak lift has NOTHING to do with piston to valve clearance.
Click to expand...

peak lift, duration, and seperation have everything to do with it...
 
R

Ryan441

Member
Nov 26, 2007
173
0
16
wintersprings, fl
Jun 15, 2008
#9
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #9
i have a blower cam w/ about 500 miles on it ill sell it pm me
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 15, 2008
#10
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #10
Will Smith said:
peak lift, duration, and seperation have everything to do with it...
Click to expand...

No peak lift has nothing to do with it.

Take a 108* intake centerline, 3.543" stroke, and a factory 5.933 rod.

The piston will be down the bore 2.561", while the valve is open .500"-.600".

So how is that going to hit?

Just for sake of argument let's take a camshaft with .500, or even .600" of peak lift.

Now take the factory 4.6L stroke of 3.543". Why would anyone want to open up the valve all the way (.500"-.600"), when the piston is at TDC?

The pressure differential and volume are next to nill.

Also, do not think one 112* LSA is the same as another 112* LSA (same with duration) and that they will act the same.

So how does one figure out the LSA?

If you know the Intake Centerline (ICL) and the Exhaust Centerline (ECL), you can add them together and divide by 2, as follows:

Say you have a 107 ICL and a 117 ECL.

(107+117)/2 =112 LSA.

Keep in mind, that a LSA of 112 does not mean the camshaft will act the same as another camshaft with a LSA of 112. The LSA is determined by different valve opening and closing events, figuring out the ICL and ECL from them, and doing the above math. I will use two typical camshafts below, to show how you cannot compare a camshaft based on the LSA alone. It is just a little piece in the design of a camshaft.

The Ford Racing Z303 camshaft has the following valve events at .050":

Intake Opening: 7* BTDC
Intake Closing: 41* ABDC
Exhaust Opening: 51* BBDC
Exhaust Closing: 3* BTDC

IO+IC+One Stroke = Duration for Intake @ .050" or 7+41+180 = 228*.

EO+EC+One Stroke = Duration for Exhaust @ .050" or 51-3+180 = 228*.

Now find the ICL and ECL.

Intake Centerline is found by: (Intake Duration/2) - IO BTDC. In other words...

228/2 = 114. 114-7 = 107* ICL.

Exhaust Centerline is found by: Exhaust Duration/2 + EC BTDC. In other words...

228/2 = 114. 114+3 = 117* ECL.

107+117 = 224/2 = 112* LSA.

Now quickly, one can do this for the Lunati 51014 camshaft. It has the following valve timing specs at .050" and a LSA of 112, like the Z303 camshaft:

Intake Opening: 1* BTDC
Intake Closing: 37* ABDC
Exhaust Opening: 49* BBDC
Exhaust Closing: -3* ATDC

Intake Duration is 1+37+180 = 218*. The ICL is (218/2)-1 = 108*.

Exhaust Duration is 49-3+180 = 226*. The ECL is (226/2)+3 = 116*.

LSA = (108+116)/2 = 112* LSA.

Now you see that both, the Z303 and the Lunati camshaft have the same LSA, but different individual valve events and ICL/ECL figures. So how can a camshaft with the same LSA, act the same, or idle at a particular level?

It cannot because of many different factors and an endless amount of possibilities.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jun 15, 2008
#11
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #11
Ha. 5spdGT, I knew someone was going to challenge that one. I was ready with a response if so - but not nearly as detailed as that one.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
Jun 16, 2008
#12
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #12
5spd GT said:
No peak lift has nothing to do with it.

Take a 108* intake centerline, 3.543" stroke, and a factory 5.933 rod.

The piston will be down the bore 2.561", while the valve is open .500"-.600".

So how is that going to hit?

Just for sake of argument let's take a camshaft with .500, or even .600" of peak lift.

Now take the factory 4.6L stroke of 3.543". Why would anyone want to open up the valve all the way (.500"-.600"), when the piston is at TDC?

The pressure differential and volume are next to nill.

Also, do not think one 112* LSA is the same as another 112* LSA (same with duration) and that they will act the same.

So how does one figure out the LSA?

If you know the Intake Centerline (ICL) and the Exhaust Centerline (ECL), you can add them together and divide by 2, as follows:

Say you have a 107 ICL and a 117 ECL.

(107+117)/2 =112 LSA.

Keep in mind, that a LSA of 112 does not mean the camshaft will act the same as another camshaft with a LSA of 112. The LSA is determined by different valve opening and closing events, figuring out the ICL and ECL from them, and doing the above math. I will use two typical camshafts below, to show how you cannot compare a camshaft based on the LSA alone. It is just a little piece in the design of a camshaft.

The Ford Racing Z303 camshaft has the following valve events at .050":

Intake Opening: 7* BTDC
Intake Closing: 41* ABDC
Exhaust Opening: 51* BBDC
Exhaust Closing: 3* BTDC

IO+IC+One Stroke = Duration for Intake @ .050" or 7+41+180 = 228*.

EO+EC+One Stroke = Duration for Exhaust @ .050" or 51-3+180 = 228*.

Now find the ICL and ECL.

Intake Centerline is found by: (Intake Duration/2) - IO BTDC. In other words...

228/2 = 114. 114-7 = 107* ICL.

Exhaust Centerline is found by: Exhaust Duration/2 + EC BTDC. In other words...

228/2 = 114. 114+3 = 117* ECL.

107+117 = 224/2 = 112* LSA.

Now quickly, one can do this for the Lunati 51014 camshaft. It has the following valve timing specs at .050" and a LSA of 112, like the Z303 camshaft:

Intake Opening: 1* BTDC
Intake Closing: 37* ABDC
Exhaust Opening: 49* BBDC
Exhaust Closing: -3* ATDC

Intake Duration is 1+37+180 = 218*. The ICL is (218/2)-1 = 108*.

Exhaust Duration is 49-3+180 = 226*. The ECL is (226/2)+3 = 116*.

LSA = (108+116)/2 = 112* LSA.

Now you see that both, the Z303 and the Lunati camshaft have the same LSA, but different individual valve events and ICL/ECL figures. So how can a camshaft with the same LSA, act the same, or idle at a particular level?

It cannot because of many different factors and an endless amount of possibilities.
Click to expand...

this belongs in a sticky somewhere, very informative
 
F

Fastwrx15

Banned
May 11, 2008
42
0
0
Woodstock,Illinois
Jun 16, 2008
#13
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #13
Stock PI camshafts or Comp XE262.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
589
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
160
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
667
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
0
Security help
  • 05turboturdpt
  • Aug 19, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
274
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2025
05turboturdpt
0
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
408
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?