• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Piston to Valve clearance on cam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94CobraPace
  • Start date Start date Aug 3, 2005

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Aug 3, 2005
#1
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #1
Before I ask, I will check the piston to valve clearance, but just want to see if any one has had clearance problems with a cam for a 351W. Cam specs are:
Intake Exhaust
Lift: 472" 496"
Dura @ .050 214 224
Lobe Center 107 117
That's what is on the cam card.
This is on a stock rebuild with 4 barrel intake, dual exhaust, app 9.2 compression ratio.

Any idea how the idle will be, wanting people to know it is at least not a stock cam. How is the power? Just checking more than anything.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Aug 3, 2005
#2
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #2
P to v clearance should not even be close if you have stock size valves and pistons. Is this the only mod from a stock rebuild?
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Aug 3, 2005
#3
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #3
its going to have a slightly lumpy idle.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Aug 3, 2005
#4
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #4
thats a pretty mild cam. You shouldnt have any troubles.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Aug 4, 2005
#5
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #5
No problems for me running an XE262H cam in my 351w with stock heads. It has 0.500 lift which is less than yours. Be sure to check preload after swapping in that cam. I had to use an adapter kit to make my non-adjustable valvetrain into adjustables. My preload was around 0.150" and the maximum is 0.060". I chose that route instead of ordering custom shorter pushrods.
 
6

65stang289

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
922
0
0
Fort walton Beach FL.
Aug 4, 2005
#6
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #6
I got the same cam in my 289 and it does have a lope. Nice sound too if I can run it with no problems with stock heads then you should be fine. The thing I hate right now is that it does not kick in till 2500.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
876
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
For Sale Edelbrock Performer Ford cam and lifter set-429/460
  • My2001car
  • Dec 11, 2023
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
880
Other Classifieds Dec 11, 2023
My2001car
M
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
791
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Engine Head/Cam Recommendations
  • CWSpartan
  • May 29, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
732
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 31, 2024
Noobz347
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?