• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Please dont laugh, but what is this??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tonys96Cobra
  • Start date Start date Feb 27, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

futura

New Member
Aug 5, 2004
10
0
0
Feb 27, 2006
#21
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #21
additions

That double sway bar thing is a first for me too. I noticed a lot more stiffness in the rear-end of my road course 02 GT when I put in the rear shock tower brace. Don't know how well two sway bars might do though.
 

mustangsally93

New Member
Sep 26, 2005
281
0
0
Omaha,NE
Feb 27, 2006
#22
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #22
cevtv said:
Here is some info on the Steeda.....




http://www.steeda.com/store/-catalog/rearswaybar.htm

PST used to sell an add-on bar, too.



.
Click to expand...


LOL I have that on my 93 pony.. I guess my brother or I must have done it back in 93 or 94(I think those years). WOW I'm dumb... 10 point loss for me
 
C

criticman

Member
Sep 7, 2003
723
1
16
Rome, GA
Feb 27, 2006
#23
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #23
Michael Yount said:
I confess, adding a second bar to a Stang - it's the first I've seen. I suspect the Steeda bar was developed for cars that had no rear bar originally. But, maybe not...
Click to expand...

Michael,
If you read Steeda's website in that link, they state that it was designed to compliment the stock bar...so it was designed for cars with the bar already on them.

From Steeda's Website
Steeda's Adjustable Rear Swaybar works with your stock rear swaybar to dramatically improve handling.
Click to expand...
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Feb 28, 2006
#24
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #24
Well, there you have it....it would appear it's there just as it's supposed to be. Although one would wonder why they just didn't produce a stock bar in a larger diameter to save all the extra weight and trouble...
 
C

criticman

Member
Sep 7, 2003
723
1
16
Rome, GA
Feb 28, 2006
#25
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #25
True. I would assume they did in depth R&D prior making their decision, but it does seem like a replacement reducing weight would be best. Oh well.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust Exhaust resonance
  • keel
  • Jul 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
291
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 11, 2026
keel
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
221
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
S
Brakes 80 Mustang 4.2 rear chassis brake line for 5 lug conversion!
  • StangPowerLSX510
  • Aug 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
123
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 9, 2026
limp
Front Coil Overs and Rear Traditional Springs within a Maximum Motorsports K-Member Kit
  • Habu135
  • Sep 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
484
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2026
Habu135
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
948
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 7, 2026
Kleinjj27
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?