• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Please help me with my cam? I am desperate.

  • Thread starter Thread starter eightyfour
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2003
E

eightyfour

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
125
0
0
Whitestone, NY
Dec 13, 2003
#1
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #1
By the time I get my car back on the road, it will have Edelbrock Performer 5.0 heads, and one of two cams:

Comp Cams XE262H
* Duration: 262 intake/270 exhaust
* Duration at .050 in.: 218 intake/224 exhaust
* Gross valve lift: .493 in. intake/.500 in. exhaust
* Lobe separation: 110 degrees
* RPM range: 1,300 to 5,600
* Excellent response, good mid-range, stock converter, 3.23 to 4.10 gear

OR

Comp Cams XE268H
Specifications:
* Duration: 268 intake/280 exhaust
* Duration at .050 in.: 224 intake/230 exhaust
* Gross valve lift: .510 in. intake/.512 in. exhaust
* Lobe separation: 110 degrees
* RPM range: 1,600 to 5,800
* Great for Street Machine, 2,200 plus stall

I have spoken to many a tech. rep about these two cams, and it seems like they are evenly torn. One guy tells me 262, the next guy tells me 268. I am getting my AOD rebuilt over the winter at a shop and they suggest around 2400 for a daily driver. Which cam better suits my daily driving needs with a street race every now and then? Thanks!
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Dec 14, 2003
#2
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #2
eightyfour said:
By the time I get my car back on the road, it will have Edelbrock Performer 5.0 heads, and one of two cams:

Comp Cams XE262H
* Duration: 262 intake/270 exhaust
* Duration at .050 in.: 218 intake/224 exhaust
* Gross valve lift: .493 in. intake/.500 in. exhaust
* Lobe separation: 110 degrees
* RPM range: 1,300 to 5,600
* Excellent response, good mid-range, stock converter, 3.23 to 4.10 gear

OR

Comp Cams XE268H
Specifications:
* Duration: 268 intake/280 exhaust
* Duration at .050 in.: 224 intake/230 exhaust
* Gross valve lift: .510 in. intake/.512 in. exhaust
* Lobe separation: 110 degrees
* RPM range: 1,600 to 5,800
* Great for Street Machine, 2,200 plus stall

I have spoken to many a tech. rep about these two cams, and it seems like they are evenly torn. One guy tells me 262, the next guy tells me 268. I am getting my AOD rebuilt over the winter at a shop and they suggest around 2400 for a daily driver. Which cam better suits my daily driving needs with a street race every now and then? Thanks!
Click to expand...

how desperate are you???

I say go with the Comp Cams XE268H, simply for the extra duration and lift, plus your using a rpm intake which is designed for higher rpm ranges.
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Dec 14, 2003
#3
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #3
bmo37 said:
how desperate are you???

I say go with the Comp Cams XE268H, simply for the extra duration and lift, plus your using a rpm intake which is designed for higher rpm ranges.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The 268 is not going to be too radical or anything. Both cams are relatively mild. The bigger will probably net more gains. With a well matched converter, it will drive great!
 

matty50racer

Founding Member
Nov 8, 2002
242
0
16
Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2003
#4
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #4
I Say go for the XE268H also. My friend with the same setup as you went with an XE262H on a 112 LSA and, and I think he should have gone one size bigger. I also think if you do get the XE268H get it custum ground on a 112 LSA because it works much better with the computer. It doesn't cost any more, just takes a little wait to get it. It took 2 weeks to get my Comp custom cam... butt mine is bit bigger solid race cam.
 
E

eightyfour

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
125
0
0
Whitestone, NY
Dec 14, 2003
#5
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #5
Ok kool, thanks. Should I go any higher than that? Something like the Edelbrock RPM cam? .496/.520, 224/234?
 

matty50racer

Founding Member
Nov 8, 2002
242
0
16
Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2003
#6
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #6
eightyfour said:
Ok kool, thanks. Should I go any higher than that? Something like the Edelbrock RPM cam? .496/.520, 224/234?
Click to expand...

No, the Comp is a better choice. Edelbrock cams have pretty lazy ramp rates, and have too much exhaust duration compared to intake. Also make sure you get it with 351W firing order.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Dec 14, 2003
#7
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #7
Yeah, the 110 degree sep. just wont work well with your car, power brakes are nice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
289 cam break in help
  • iaff284
  • Aug 19, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
808
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2022
iaff284
I
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
791
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
M
Engine Cam Question
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Jan 10, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 14, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
Rebuild heads or new heads
  • Funwithfox
  • Aug 31, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 3, 2020
Boostedpimp
D
Stock rocker arm breaking
  • Darwin1990
  • Sep 5, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 6, 2020
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?