• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Plug gap question

  • Thread starter Thread starter topless95
  • Start date Start date Dec 17, 2008
T

topless95

New Member
Feb 4, 2008
27
0
0
North Florida
Dec 17, 2008
#1
  • Dec 17, 2008
  • #1
I have a good question, on my 95 5.0 it calls for the plugs to be gapped at .054" , when I changed the plugs they were originally at .035" . Since changing the plugs it feels as if performance has gone down, any ideas? Lastly I am about to put some GT40 x303 heads on next week and I am picking up Motorcraft AGSF-32c plugs, what should I gap them at (On a side note I am also adding a Crane HI6s system, tired of all the unburned fuel coming out of the tail pipe)?

Thanks as always
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 18, 2008
#2
  • Dec 18, 2008
  • #2
topless95 said:
I have a good question, on my 95 5.0 it calls for the plugs to be gapped at .054" , when I changed the plugs they were originally at .035" . Since changing the plugs it feels as if performance has gone down, any ideas? Lastly I am about to put some GT40 x303 heads on next week and I am picking up Motorcraft AGSF-32c plugs, what should I gap them at (On a side note I am also adding a Crane HI6s system, tired of all the unburned fuel coming out of the tail pipe)?

Thanks as always
Click to expand...

The gap as noted should be at .054". A .035" gap would generally be right for boosted applications. Not familiar with the plugs you are referring to but experience seems to favor staying with the basic copper core plugs for our engines.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 18, 2008
#3
  • Dec 18, 2008
  • #3
Toyman is correct.

The difference in the power feeling is likely from the underlying issue (you mentioned unburned fuel). If this is indeed true, the smaller gap is less likely to foul.

The gap is your call. If things stay the same and 0.035" worked for you before, I'd run 0.050" with a box. The extra juice should mitigate the extra gap.....

Good luck.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 18, 2008
#4
  • Dec 18, 2008
  • #4
They seem to run the best at about .042" .054" is way too big.

Kurt
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 18, 2008
#5
  • Dec 18, 2008
  • #5
Kurt, without further info, I'd respectfully disagree. A healthy stock TFI ignition on a stockish car (I've not seen him mention anything extraordinary in his combo) should easily handle the 0.056" gap (they can handle more).
Now your combo would be a totally different ball of wax............
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Dec 21, 2008
#6
  • Dec 21, 2008
  • #6
Crikey! This question is on every Stang web site on the intranez!

Too small gap=reduction in spark power
Too large gap=increased # misfires and thus reduction in power

Read:
forums.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?p=8145423
Amazon.com: Performance Ignition Systems, Dr. C. Jacobs
Stealth 316 - 3S Spark Plug Information
Autospeed

Then search. The troof is out there.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 21, 2008
#7
  • Dec 21, 2008
  • #7
HISSIN50 said:
Kurt, without further info, I'd respectfully disagree. A healthy stock TFI ignition on a stockish car (I've not seen him mention anything extraordinary in his combo) should easily handle the 0.056" gap (they can handle more).
Now your combo would be a totally different ball of wax............
Click to expand...

I've found that stock gap works, but taking it down just a little helps the car run smoother and make more power.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1994 5.0 refuses to idle
  • FordFanatic1894
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
471
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 22, 2025
General karthief
W
New plugs, wires, dist cap and rotor, now randomly stalling
  • WhiskeyFoxTrot
  • Oct 12, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
476
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
WhiskeyFoxTrot
W
F
Resolved Stumble issue upon acceleration (1987 GT)
  • FoxDude87
  • Sep 16, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2024
FastDriver
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
789
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
664
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?