• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

poll for which heads i should get

  • Thread starter Thread starter luke_ftw
  • Start date Start date Apr 18, 2005

Which heads should i buy

  • AFR 185cc

    Votes: 7 41.2%
  • Trick Flow TWs

    Votes: 10 58.8%

  • Total voters
    17
L

luke_ftw

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
37
0
0
Apr 18, 2005
#1
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #1
AFR 185cc
Trick Flow TW


looking for good power up to redline.
other mods:
edelbrock rpm 2 intake manifold
intake/exhaust bolt-ons

leave comments on your vote.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Apr 18, 2005
#2
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #2
Trick Flow
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Apr 18, 2005
#3
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #3
TW I like the fact you can use 2.02 with out nothching the pistons. It's kinda hard to say which is best with out knowing the full story like 302/306/cam and I'm sure they will both work great no matter which you chose.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Apr 18, 2005
#4
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #4
What pistons do you have? If they are stock the AFR185 will NOT work. If you can run them though, my choice is definitely the AFR 185's.
 
L

luke_ftw

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
37
0
0
Apr 18, 2005
#5
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #5
yes pistons are stock.
why cant i run the AFRs? Compression ratio issues?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Apr 18, 2005
#6
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #6
TW heads are the only head that use 2.02 intake valves and have zero piston to valve clearance issues.
 
0

06cobra

Member
Feb 12, 2004
146
0
16
Apr 18, 2005
#7
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #7
With stock pistons.. you can't use either heads(especially with healthy cam) without clearancing the pistons, which isn't hard. BUT factory pistons aren't designed with enough meat in the areas needed to clearance for the TWs.
Truth be told, your car will perform excellent with the AFRs165, you don't have enough for the 185s.
 
L

luke_ftw

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
37
0
0
Apr 18, 2005
#8
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #8
TWs arent bolt ons?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Apr 18, 2005
#9
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #9
The 2.02" valve in the AFR185 poses piston to valve clearance issues (they'll hit), the TW head gets away with the larger valve because the valve is located in a different position in the chamber than the standard position. The holley heads ALSO have a 2.02" valve and can be used on a stock shortblock since they recessed the valave a good bit up into the head.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 18, 2005
#10
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #10
06cobra said:
With stock pistons.. you can't use either heads(especially with healthy cam) without clearancing the pistons, which isn't hard. BUT factory pistons aren't designed with enough meat in the areas needed to clearance for the TWs.
Truth be told, your car will perform excellent with the AFRs165, you don't have enough for the 185s.
Click to expand...



Terrible information....


The TFS twisted wedge was DESIGNED so that you didnt have to knotch the pistons. The AFR 185 WONT work with stock pistons but the twisted wedge will...there are as many guys running the AFR165's as twisted wedges on stock shortblocks....no one touches the piston unless they run some insane cam.

TFS told me that u can get away with the stage 2 on stock shortblocks...it will be close and that you might have to retard it a tad bit.

BTW, from my experience and from talking to others, its the exhaust valve that is usually the problem valve...which is still a 1.6.
 
L

luke_ftw

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
37
0
0
Apr 18, 2005
#11
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #11
how big of hp/tq gains would i see on a stage two over a stage 1 head?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 18, 2005
#12
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #12
luke_ftw said:
how big of hp/tq gains would i see on a stage two over a stage 1 head?
Click to expand...


Sorry i was talking about the stage 1 cam and stage 2 cam. Im not sure of what more power you would get...you would need to match it with the intake. I say go with a custom cam though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
989
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
457
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
475
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?