Poor mans vette

donjohn

New Member

Feb 7, 2004

1,757

0

0

Irvine - Southern California

Sep 6, 2004

#21

• Sep 6, 2004

• #21

stang_gt_1994 said:

The new GTO uses a LS1, I guess its a good motor if they still use it. Get your facts straight meanngreen94, and you talk like a company would use the same engine forever, remember ford did switch to a 4.6 in 96. BTW a 289 has a 4 inch bore like the 302 but has a 2.87 inch stroke verses 302 3 inch stroke.

Click to expand...

the new GTOs use an LS2... soo

now with that piece of information out, let the rebuking continue.

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Sep 6, 2004

#22

• Sep 6, 2004

• #22

.

 

donjohn

New Member

Feb 7, 2004

1,757

0

0

Irvine - Southern California

Sep 6, 2004

#23

• Sep 6, 2004

• #23

DUDE stop the ****ing pissing match alright, in 2005 the GTO was pronounced with the LS2 engine so take a chill pill man

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-197479

i could give a crap about this argument, but enough bein mean.

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Sep 6, 2004

#24

• Sep 6, 2004

• #24

.

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Sep 6, 2004

#25

• Sep 6, 2004

• #25

.

 

donjohn

New Member

Feb 7, 2004

1,757

0

0

Irvine - Southern California

Sep 6, 2004

#26

• Sep 6, 2004

• #26

you're talking about the 2004!!!!. the 2005 has the LS2 so what the hell is going on. I'd like to hear from someone else who isn't for some reason very adamant about this issue

 

donjohn

New Member

Feb 7, 2004

1,757

0

0

Irvine - Southern California

Sep 6, 2004

#27

• Sep 6, 2004

• #27

stang_gt_1994 said:

And I was talking about a 2004.

Click to expand...

that's perfectly fine, i said in 2005 it is an ls2

since were talking about how the engine is sooo badass, they did in fact change it.

ur right, in 2004 it's an ls1 but in 2005 it's an ls2. no need to be an ass, i wasn't to begin with

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Sep 6, 2004

#28

• Sep 6, 2004

• #28

What is the point of this tread anyway. A mod needs to put a 94-95 BS forum up.

 

AznStanger3v

Active Member

Aug 11, 2003

2,026

0

47

Northern VA

Sep 6, 2004

#29

• Sep 6, 2004

• #29

why did this argument spawn?

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Sep 6, 2004

#30

• Sep 6, 2004

• #30

About LS1's in GTO's.

 

J

jghood13

New Member

Oct 2, 2003

160

0

0

NY

Sep 6, 2004

#31

• Sep 6, 2004

• #31

super302 said:

ls1 isn't bad, its quicker than the 5.0 and 4.6 outta the box. As for the 351W, i don't know where you're going with that.

Click to expand...

The 03 and 04 cobras are a 4.6. Does that mean its slower too????

 

squall9393

New Member

Feb 7, 2004

534

0

0

Oceanside, CA

Sep 6, 2004

#32

• Sep 6, 2004

• #32

17yrOldStanger said:

why did this argument spawn?

Click to expand...

 

C

CPSTACKMONEY

New Member

Aug 1, 2004

31

0

0

SE GA

Sep 6, 2004

#33

• Sep 6, 2004

• #33

Looks like everyone is pissed. I understood what the man was trying to say the first time. WHAT IF Ford had matched GM in cubic inches and went with the 351 with alum. heads on top of that. The R cam with iron heads and made like 300 horses. SO, if Ford did go with an alum. headed 351 to match the LS1, it would have smoked that ass.

Did I get that right meanngreen94?
Everyone doesn't know how to read the language of jibberish. LOL

 

M

meanngreen94

New Member

Sep 6, 2004

40

0

0

south carolina

Sep 6, 2004

#34

• Sep 6, 2004

• #34

Amen brother you got the point of the whole thread (CPSTACKMONEY)







hypertech programming,trickflow intake,off road h-pipe,flowmasters 40,bbk shorty headers, bbk underdrive pullies,granatelli mass air,bbk 65 mm throtle bbk cold air, 160 degree thermostat, 373 gears, eibach springs, 18 inch cobra r's

 

5

5literstang

New Member

Apr 15, 2003

1,374

0

0

Clark, NJ

Sep 6, 2004

#35

• Sep 6, 2004

• #35

we all know mustangs are better then camaros, case closed.

 

M

meanngreen94

New Member

Sep 6, 2004

40

0

0

south carolina

Sep 6, 2004

#36

• Sep 6, 2004

• #36

Amen to that 2 5literstang









hypertech programming,trickflow intake,off road h-pipe,flowmasters 40,bbk shorty headers, bbk underdrive pullies,granatelli mass air,bbk 65 mm throtle bbk cold air, 160 degree thermostat, 373 gears, eibach springs, 18 inch cobra r's

 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"

15 Year Member

Nov 29, 1999

14,679

424

154

Boca Raton, Florida

Sep 6, 2004

#37

• Sep 6, 2004

• #37

Since there is no point to this thread.