• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Poor MPG

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1105
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Sep 28, 2004
#21
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #21
Grn92LX said:
Wrong. The 160* stat will NOT effect going into closed loop. Open loop to closed loop is TIME based.
Click to expand...
True and false. True that the 160 thermostat will not keep the computer from entering closed loop. False that closed loop is only time based. It *does* depend on ECT, but it's very low -- about 135 if I remember correctly. And of course it also depends on load, the computer will not enter closed loop in a high load situation. And also, a H/C/I 5.0 will miscalculate load, causing open loop to occur much more often. This can be fixed with a good chip or EEC tuning device.

For the guy who suggested measuring with the highway markers -- bad idea, they are very inaccurate in most cases. I've checked using my GPS and found that the markers vary by plus or minus 20%. Use a GPS if you want to verify your speedo reading.

Dave
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#22
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #22
Running too cold can hurt your gas mileage, but we don't worry about that in Florida.

Kurt
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Sep 28, 2004
#23
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #23
I dont know how cool my car is running because I dont have an aftermarket water temp gauge, but after I took out the A/C condensor, the the needle on the stock gauge (not saying much) went from 1/2 way across to only a 1/4 way across. As far as I know, I'm still running the stock O2 sensors. How exactly do bad O2 sensors cause poor gas mileage? I'm going to turn my FP down to 40psi with the vac line hooked up, and see how many miles I get to a tank then, then might change my O2's out if its still bad. I'm looking for a Tweecer R/T right now to tune it so once I find one, I'll be able to do some more stuff.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Sep 28, 2004
#24
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #24
There's no way the gears could have affected the mileage that much. The temp won't affect it too much as long as it's decently hot and in OL. I run my coolant around 190° (ECT read) and I'm getting about 250-260mi/13gallons and it doesn't change if I run it warmer.

ANyway, I just don't see gears changing it much if at all.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Sep 28, 2004
#25
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #25
Again, not saying much, but the needle sits between the N and O in NORMAL... Never gets hotter than that.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#26
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #26
If you are still running stock 02 sensors, then it's probably time for a switch. When they get old, the cycle slowly, and the car will compensate by conservatively running richer.

Kurt
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Sep 28, 2004
#27
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #27
you know, when my car was stock, I was getting about 16mpg on average... now, since the O/R pipe, I can go about 260 before I refuel, or about 21mpg I guess that's just my car though... one of the lucky ones.
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Sep 28, 2004
#28
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #28
Ide love to have an answer too...

from asking around, posting on this site and others, the real answer is, no one really knows, when it comes to tuning, except the pro's.

hell, im probably getting worse milage then you, ( i dont even bothering calaculating mpg, its that bad)
with an 8.0 a/f ratio at cruise and WOT.

my bumpers covered in black suit! lol
 
S

smokediver27

New Member
Jun 16, 2003
203
0
0
Florida
Sep 28, 2004
#29
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #29
mo_dingo said:
If you have 3.73's, and a 23 tooth speedo gear, then for every 100 miles your odometer, you actually only went 95. Which means when you calculate your gas mileage, you need to take 5% off of the mileage on the odometer, then divide it by the amount of fuel used. So you are getting WORSE mileage then you what your odometer is telling you!!! Sorry, just wanted to correct you on that point.
Scott
Click to expand...

Hold on now, I'm drinking me some white russians now, so let me think about this I did not change the speedo gear, I used the Electronic SpeedCal by Dallasmustang for the cluster calibration.

My Car
1 Mile = .9 Odometer Miles
10 Miles = 9 Odometer Miles
100 Miles = 90 Odometer Miles
200 Miles = 180 Odometer Miles.

Am I making sense here??? So if i go and get 5 gallons of fuel after driving 100 miles per the odometer, I have attained 20mpg. Problem is, if the odometer reads 100, I have actually covered 110-111 miles , thus 22 mpg? Am I way off here???
 
S

Silver85TC

New Member
May 28, 2003
130
1
0
Sep 29, 2004
#30
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #30
One more thing to check for those of you who still have the stock air pump/thermactor system....

My car wasn't getting the mpg's I thought it should so I started checking a few things. Plugs and O2's looked like the car was running rich (hence the poor gas mileage). I discovered the diverter valve for the air pump was stuck in the position that allows air to go to the heads!!! The PCM was totally thinking the car was running really lean (therefore adding more fuel to the mixture) because the O2's were seeing so much oxygen in the exhaust!!! Doh!!

I fixed the diverter valve (it should only feed air to the heads for 30 secs or so right after you start the engine) and my gas mileage has improved a ton.
An exhaust leak ahead of the O2's would cause the same problem.

Cheers.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 29, 2004
#31
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #31
HairyCanary said:
True and false. True that the 160 thermostat will not keep the computer from entering closed loop. False that closed loop is only time based. It *does* depend on ECT, but it's very low -- about 135 if I remember correctly. And of course it also depends on load, the computer will not enter closed loop in a high load situation. And also, a H/C/I 5.0 will miscalculate load, causing open loop to occur much more often. This can be fixed with a good chip or EEC tuning device.


Dave
Click to expand...


I disagree and even what I posted from fordchip says its only time based.
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Sep 29, 2004
#32
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #32
my stock car was(is) getting bad gas millage. I am not exactly sure how much but it is just about on empty with 113miles since I filled it up. Ran a test on it and came up with a bad o2 sensor. Changed 1 sensor now I will see if it gets better.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Sep 29, 2004
#33
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #33
what test would i need to run to check my O2 sensors? Would bad O2 sensors also hurt your performance, or just gas milage?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 29, 2004
#34
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #34
Hook a volt gauge to the signal wire. The voltage should cycle quit rapidly at cruise. It should cycle up and down about once a second.

Kurt
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Sep 29, 2004
#35
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #35
Zach I get the same mileage on my car . I'm hoping to be able to put a conservative tune in the PMS for city driving and see what it will do. 110 was my last full tank @ $30.28
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 29, 2004
#36
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #36
Guys, I'm at 230miles now on the same tank I posted about earlier and it is just a needle width under 1/4 right now. I did stop and go driving ALL day today. I will get an easy 250 miles on this tank of fuel. My O2 sensors are still stock.
 
K

King Cobra 22

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
175
0
0
Sep 29, 2004
#37
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #37
smokediver27 said:
Hold on now, I'm drinking me some white russians now, so let me think about this I did not change the speedo gear, I used the Electronic SpeedCal by Dallasmustang for the cluster calibration.

My Car
1 Mile = .9 Odometer Miles
10 Miles = 9 Odometer Miles
100 Miles = 90 Odometer Miles
200 Miles = 180 Odometer Miles.

Am I making sense here??? So if i go and get 5 gallons of fuel after driving 100 miles per the odometer, I have attained 20mpg. Problem is, if the odometer reads 100, I have actually covered 110-111 miles , thus 22 mpg? Am I way off here???
Click to expand...

I also have a speed cal but with 4:10's.Would I be getting 1 mile = .9 miles etc... on my odometer or would it be different?

Also with the speed cal,how much off is the speedometer?

BTW I get about 17-18 mpg city driving and driving fast and hwy and city I get about 19-20 mpg.Thats with 4:10's and a bunch of other bolt on's.
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Sep 29, 2004
#38
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #38
Holy crap....with my 100% stock car Ive been getting around 190 miles per tank on 100% city driving...Maybe I should start driving like Miss Daisy is in the back?
 

onebad95

Sherriff of Bling King County
Jul 22, 2002
1,237
0
37
At the end of the track waiting for you !!
Sep 29, 2004
#39
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #39
I too was getting bad gas milleage after the vortech install until I put a tornado in the inlet tube. Now I am seeing 24 mpg. I can't believe that thing worked so well.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 29, 2004
#40
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #40
onebad95 said:
I too was getting bad gas milleage after the vortech install until I put a tornado in the inlet tube. Now I am seeing 24 mpg. I can't believe that thing worked so well.
Click to expand...



 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
982
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
Looking forward to collaborating with my new community
  • phil2001svt
  • Sep 24, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
632
The Welcome Wagon Oct 10, 2026
phil2001svt
finding wiring from PCM to fuel tank pressure sensor
  • Roont
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
273
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Roont
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
879
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?