• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ported Intake question

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdksek844
  • Start date Start date May 7, 2004
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 7, 2004
#1
  • May 7, 2004
  • #1
I ported my upper stock intake last week to match the 70 mm throttle body that I already had on the car expecting some decent improvement. But to my surprise, I think (seat of pants feeling) that I may have lost a bit of torque. The only improvement I noticed was a slight increase up top in rpms, but until I get to the track, I dont know if I gained enough horsepower to over weigh the loss in torque. Am I right about this thought, or should I have gained power and torque? Any input would be appreciated.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 7, 2004
#2
  • May 7, 2004
  • #2
The biggest flow bottleneck on the stock engine is the lower intake manifold. You can add bigger components upstream of that (maf, throttle body, opening the upper to 70mm, etc.) til the cows come home and it won't make much difference because the potential increase in flow can't make it past the lower intake. Send your lower off to tmoss (search the site) -- he'll port it for a reasonable price for a difference you can really feel.
 
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 7, 2004
#3
  • May 7, 2004
  • #3
I'm planning on replacing the upper and lower later, but my reason for asking was to see as to why I lost low end torque? All I did was allow the 70mm throttle body already bolted to 56mm opening breathe better and I lost torque. I found it strange and was wondering if this was normal.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 7, 2004
#4
  • May 7, 2004
  • #4
rdk - unless you have back to back dyno numbers before and after the change (under similar ambient conditions), you don't really know what you've got. Seat of the pants is a terrible indicator of actual performance. And, if it is actually weaker, it could be due to any number of other things related to the work (vacuum leaks, timing change, fuel system malfunction, etc.). Do you have the bigger egr spacer as well?

Intake manifold runner length changes can directly affect torque in different rpm ranges (in general the longer the runner the better the bottom end torque at the cost of higher rpm power). But that runner length starts at the intake plenum - which is well downstream of where you made your change. The change you made can remove a flow obstruction which might help higher rpm power levels if that were the flow bottleneck in the system. IN your case, it's not - so the change should have made little difference at all. I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it - get your intake changed/ported, and then see what you've got. IN any event - what can you do about it? Not like you're gonna put another stock one on to check and see, right?
 
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 7, 2004
#5
  • May 7, 2004
  • #5
LOL, actually I have another upper that I can put back on if my times are slower from the ones in my sig.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 8, 2004
#6
  • May 8, 2004
  • #6
Personnaly, I would'nt take a stock upper out past 65mm.
 
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 8, 2004
#7
  • May 8, 2004
  • #7
Yeah, I'm thinking it was a mistake, but I have a spare and it is a stock intake which are a dime a dozen so the only thing I lost was a little time. But it was my first port job and I did learn alot. So all in all I'll look at it as a learning experience. I should have asked you first about it.
 
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 8, 2004
#8
  • May 8, 2004
  • #8
I took a look at your site. How do you get the inside of the ports so clean. When i had my upper off, i tried to clean out the black stuff with simple green and it did not even come close to cleaning it off. What is your secret?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 8, 2004
#9
  • May 8, 2004
  • #9
Bead blsting the crap off after running it through parts washer. Parts washer solvent takes the oil based crud off and the bead blast takes the exhaust deposits off the solvent won't touch.
 
R

rdksek844

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2001
300
0
0
Port St. Lucie, FL
May 12, 2004
#10
  • May 12, 2004
  • #10
Ahh. Thanks. How much do you charge to port a stock lower, and with my now realized over ported upper, how much power am I looking to gain? (Approx.)
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 12, 2004
#11
  • May 12, 2004
  • #11
PM me with your email address and I'll send info..........The upper won't "hurt" much after flow potential of the lower is increased. Most see 10-15HP and 15-20 ft-lbs. Some guys make the mistake of not resetting the computer memory by disconnecting the battery for at least 20 minutes and it take longer for the EEC to correct the fuel curve (now needs more fuel due to higher flows) for all driving conditions. It may take a week or two for the EEC to fully correct and for you to realize the full potential - that has been reported to me many times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Someone help me understand this, Intake opening to throttle body opening
  • from6to8
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2025
from6to8
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
936
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?