• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Power difference between heads with 2.02 vs 1.94 inch valves

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2004

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Dec 9, 2004
#1
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #1
I'm looking at getting aluminum heads. I don't think I can ones with 2.02 inch intake valves anyway because they'll interfere with stock pistons, but in any case....

How much more power does a setup with make with more aggressive valve size? Is it worth changing pistons for? Whats the largest size you can run with stock pistons?
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Dec 9, 2004
#2
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #2
There are way too man variables to figure that out.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Dec 9, 2004
#3
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #3
what heads are you looking at? The twisted wedge heads have 2.02s that you can run with the stock pistons
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Dec 9, 2004
#4
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #4
Performer RPM and Twisted Wedge, mostly.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 9, 2004
#5
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #5
Heard a few stories of Twisted Wedge heads cracking in the spark plug area and have also heard some racers talk about getting valves too large for the 289/302 engines.

Mine are Edelbrock RPM.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 9, 2004
#6
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #6
From what I hear, the power/airflow difference between 1.90 and 2.02 valves is not much at all.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 9, 2004
#7
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #7
You can run larger valves without special pistons if your cam lift and timing allow.
Like said, there are way too many variables to post a yes or no answer.
It is one of those deals where you have to mock up your engine and check valve clearance.
Technically, to build a performance engine properly you are supposed to check valve clearance regardless. If you have clearance issues, then you either use a smaller cam, shorter rocker ratio, or mill the pistons. Then you check clearance all over again until you get it right.
As for power...
It is all relative to your rpm.
Larger valves will make significantly more power, but depending on variables, it generally doesn't show up until higher rpms.
You can also lose lower rpm power, depending on your combo, if you go too big.
The difference between 1.94" and 2.02" intake valves will be minimal though. I am sure it could be as much as a 10-15 hp difference at 6000 rpm, but much less at street revs.
Dave
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Dec 9, 2004
#8
  • Dec 9, 2004
  • #8
HistoricMustang said:
Heard a few stories of Twisted Wedge heads cracking in the spark plug area and have also heard some racers talk about getting valves too large for the 289/302 engines.

Mine are Edelbrock RPM.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...

A lot of them crack in the spark plug area but it doesn't affect their performance.

I've had them all except for canfields and brodix heads.

I'd be more concerned with the cracks that occur inbetween the valve seats. Since the seats are cut so much it creates a weak point where the two seats overlap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
833
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
881
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
562
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
531
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
65
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?