• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Pro-M 75mm Bullet vs. C&L 76mm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe 5.0
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2004

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
May 3, 2004
#1
  • May 3, 2004
  • #1
Which is the preferred MAFfor our cars? I eventually will have H/C/I and maybe some FI, but not for awhile. I just want to do the little stuff because I dont have a ton of cash. Does one have less problems than the other?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 3, 2004
#2
  • May 3, 2004
  • #2
You will hear bad things from both, but IMHO I'd never put a C&L on a 94-95 car. I don't like the way they trick the airflow over the MAF wires... it leaves too much to chance to screw up, but this is just my opinion. I'd opt for the pro-m 80mm if you can afford it, that is on my to-do list someday. I'm running the 75mm Bullit now with 24lb injectors and have had ZERO problems, and I mean none. Some say that the 75mm's don't work well for some reason with 24lb injectors... I don't know why though.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
May 3, 2004
#3
  • May 3, 2004
  • #3
Well I dont think I'll do injectors until I do intake later this year, so hopefully it runs good with the 19's.

I just placed an order for the 75mm Bullet. To me, the 77 & 80mm were just way too much money for a freakin MAF. For $400 I'll buy a TFS intake or Edelbrock and make some significant hp.

What would be your guesstimate on hp & ET with 3.73's, 1.8 60's, TFS/Edelbrock intake, 70mm TB, 75mm Pro-M Maf, UD pulleys, 13*timing, Autologic chip, BBK LT's with O/R H-pipe & 2 chamber flows? I'd like to hope for 250rwhp/300+rwtq and mid 13's, but is that a pipe dream with the stock heads/cam?

Also Killer, any opinion on Professional Products throttle bodies? I'll buy the BBK 70mm if the Prof Prod 70mm is known to be crap, but I would like to keep the intake all chrome and plus the prof prod tb is like $50 cheaper than the BBK.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
May 5, 2004
#4
  • May 5, 2004
  • #4
Well I got a call from pro-m yesterday and the guy suggested using a blow-thru style meter. Its the same price but I guess I need to convert it to 4 pin since its 6 pin. He said people have problems with the regular Bullet because the sample tube is at the top of the meter, whereas the blow-thru is more centered in the air flow, making it better for reading turbulent air caused by a bend from a CAI.

Does that make sense to you guys, or is he just trying to sell me something else thats sitting around longer?

BTW I did some research on Professional Products, they seem to be a joke. I'm gonna go with the FMS 65mm.
 
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
May 5, 2004
#5
  • May 5, 2004
  • #5
I have a C & L 76mm MAF for the stock 19lb injectors, and I have had ZERO problems with it as well. When I first started it after the swap it idled just fine with no problems at all.

As for the turbulent air thing, most people who have a problem "clock" the MAF (twist it around) until it runs good. Or make your own cold air intake and don't put a bend in the tube before the MAF. Either run it straight or put the MAF in the fenderwell before the bend.

The only thing to keep in mind with the Pro M meter is that if you upgrade your injectors you will have to get the MAF recalibrated for like $100. C & L is just a sample tube switch for about $20.
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
May 5, 2004
#6
  • May 5, 2004
  • #6
My perspective:

I have had a 1995 and now a 1994 GT. I had the same C&L 76mm on both cars. The '95 loved it! The '94 absolutely would not run with it. I clocked it at every position, cleaned it, checked for leaks....nothing. It would idle rough as hell, run rich to the point that you'd start crying when in the garage and constantly fall on its face when driving under a normal load.

I replaced it with a 75mm ProM and I've had no problems at all. Our cars are VERY particular to what you do to air/fuel mixtures and timing.

The C&L is nice because you can "recalibrate" it for about $30. But the way I see it is if you get a ProM for 19# injectors and upgrade to 24# injectors, you can sell the 19# ProM VERY VERY easy. Someone is always looking for these. Buy the one you need, then sell the one you dont. Doesnt cost anything to upgrade which turns out to be cheaper than with the C&L unless you similarly sell the old calibration tube.

And to be fair to C&L, I've heard many people have problems with the ProM as well.....
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
May 6, 2004
#7
  • May 6, 2004
  • #7
I care more about the accuracy and function of the sensor than the ease of recalibration. Its gonna be awhile until I need bigger injectors, and like posted I can juse re-sell the maf and get a new one for not much more.
 
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
May 6, 2004
#8
  • May 6, 2004
  • #8
I guess I was just vveerrryyy lucky with my C & L 76mm. I can say that in the future I plan on getting a Pro-m after i "finish" my engine mods. But I liked the price and the package that the C & L came with (K & N filter, truflow inlet tube, heat shield).

Good luck with the Pro-M
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
313
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Engine Will pro-m 75mm bullet fit stock intake
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Jun 11, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
852
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 23, 2022
Mindseye007
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Spent 3 hours trying to figure out converting my jelly jar M/C to a dual reservoir M/C on my a-code '65 disc/drum
  • 1320stang
  • Sep 7, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2023
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?