• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Pro5.0 vs Steeda Tri-Ax for a T5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 86_Cobra
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
8

86_Cobra

New Member
Mar 3, 2004
6
0
0
Mar 3, 2004
#1
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #1
what would you go for on a T5? (86 GT Cobra)
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Mar 3, 2004
#2
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #2
both are good but I prefer Pro 5.0...
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Mar 3, 2004
#3
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #3
I've had both, love the tri-ax on my tremec. Cant go wrong with either.
mike.
 

RTGreen

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2001
1,866
0
0
Alabaster, Alabama
Mar 3, 2004
#4
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #4
I know this wasn't one of the choices in your question, but have you considered a Kirban shifter? They advertise teh shortest shift throw....

Two of my friends currently use this shifter and have had no issues with it. It's cheaper than the Pro 5.0 and Tri-ax as well. I'm not dogging the others...I know they are great shifters, btu you might want to check out Kirban.

RT
 
8

86_Cobra

New Member
Mar 3, 2004
6
0
0
Mar 3, 2004
#5
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #5
thanx guys and also as far as the height goes, which one is shorter?
 

MustangMulch

New Member
Mar 27, 2003
303
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Mar 3, 2004
#6
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #6
I'm pretty sure the pro 5.0 is shorter in height. It's a pretty short handle. I'm switching out my Hurst shifter for a pro 5.0 very soon. I'm not very happy with the hurst at all.
 
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
Mar 3, 2004
#7
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #7
MustangMulch said:
I'm pretty sure the pro 5.0 is shorter in height. It's a pretty short handle. I'm switching out my Hurst shifter for a pro 5.0 very soon. I'm not very happy with the hurst at all.
Click to expand...
yea hurst suck go with the steeda i like pro 5.0 is good to
 

1qckFOX

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
139
0
0
Mar 3, 2004
#8
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #8
I got a steeda tri ax. No problems
 

bigsparky

New Member
May 14, 2003
334
0
0
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Mar 3, 2004
#9
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #9
Steeda advertises theirs as the shortest throw. Go to their website
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Mar 3, 2004
#10
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #10
Steeda here, in both my cars, wouldnt have anything else!
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Mar 3, 2004
#11
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #11
I think the Pro 50 is on top in terms of quality but I hate the pro's shifter handle.. to short.. I use the pro base with a blue thunder handle and it feels much better to me as far as handle placement.. but it's a personal choice in feel.
 
K

khaotic89GT

New Member
Jun 4, 2003
84
0
0
Sunny California
Mar 3, 2004
#12
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #12
I'm changing over from the steeda to the PRO 5.0 as soon as I have the money.
 
S

StreetStang37

Founding Member
Apr 23, 2001
451
0
0
San Jose, CA
Mar 4, 2004
#13
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #13
yea hurst suck go with the pro 5.0 i like steeda is good to
 
S

SilverBullit

Founding Member
Jul 8, 2001
221
0
17
Tulsa, OK
Mar 4, 2004
#14
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #14
I've got a Tri-Ax and love it. If I ever need to buy another shifter that's what it'll be.
 
J

John89lx

New Member
Oct 6, 2003
79
0
0
Oceanside, CA
Mar 4, 2004
#15
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #15
I've got the Pro 5.0 and its fine, but the slightly longer handle on the Tri-Ax and the tilt might make it a little easier in everyday driving.
 
4

4eyed5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2004
33
0
6
VA
Mar 4, 2004
#16
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #16
I've had pro-5.0's on a t-5 and my current tko, they're very tight. I also agree though that a slightly longer handle feels better with them.
 

mustangt93

New Member
Apr 17, 2003
37
0
0
San Antonio TX
Mar 4, 2004
#17
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #17
i broke my old tri ax shifting to 3rd, the handle broke right under the threads for the knob, i would go with a pro5.0 even though i dont like the handle position, i think the tri ax is crap
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Mar 4, 2004
#18
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #18
PRO 5.0 is definately better in terms of quality...and durability
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Mar 4, 2004
#19
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #19
pro 5.0 all the way.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Mar 4, 2004
#20
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #20
mustangt93 said:
i broke my old tri ax shifting to 3rd, the handle broke right under the threads for the knob, i would go with a pro5.0 even though i dont like the handle position, i think the tri ax is crap
Click to expand...

When was that? Do you know they make them with forged aluminum handles now?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
766
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
932
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
P
market for 2.3L? i wanna sell
  • Patk
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
5
Views
253
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Dec 7, 2025
rednotch
F
Fox T5 with big block?
  • Foxy86LX
  • Apr 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
302
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2025
nickyb
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
228
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?