• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Prochamber

  • Thread starter Thread starter BitingSnake
  • Start date Start date Sep 15, 2007

BitingSnake

New Member
Sep 11, 2007
6
0
0
Marengo, OH
Sep 15, 2007
#1
  • Sep 15, 2007
  • #1
Finally got my first stang and saved up some money to start moding it. Going to be putting on a new mid pipe soon and wanted to know if the prochamber was worth the extra money. If not im just going to go with a regular o/r h pipe. Anyone running one or know if they're worth it? If not what h-pipe is the best quality. All help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
S

SmokyJoe

New Member
Sep 14, 2007
10
0
0
tulsa ok
Sep 15, 2007
#2
  • Sep 15, 2007
  • #2
Prochamber is ok, it fits good and if you like it loud, it is!
I have it on my cobra nice hp/gain also.
 
I

inphiniti

Active Member
Mar 15, 2003
412
3
28
Providence, RI
Sep 15, 2007
#3
  • Sep 15, 2007
  • #3
IMO, i think ull be fine with either ProChamber or a OR H... my personal fav for the off road h is the Macs... again with my .02, i wouldnt, however, pair a Mac O/R h pipe w/ a Mac catback on our car... for some reason it just doesnt sound right to me... for a nice clean sound, O/R h and flowmaster 40s, i think ud be really satisfied w/ it... not too loud, but is able to be when u want it to, @ WOT...

prochambers are very loud especially w/ a nice set of mufflers... look into some dumps as well...

congrats on ur car bro! be sure to post up some pics!
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Sep 16, 2007
#4
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #4
I'll pitch in my 2c here since I have personally heard/installed several cars with H,X,Prochamber.

While quite subjective, I can say for sure that the X is more of a raspy note, and also the loudest, with an H not far behind on the noise scale. The prochamber is much mellower than the first two because it is like a 3rd muffler in its construction.

I have the prochamber on my car (longtubes and mac catback also) and I really like how it sounds. At cruise it is not loud by any stretch of the imagination but noone can mistake it for stock exhaust either. And when you get on it, it screams nicely but not to the point of drawing a lot of attention.

If you've got people in your area with Mustangs, try to hook up and see how their exhaust sounds at different driving conditions, this is the best way to determine how things sound and what YOU like.

Wes
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 16, 2007
#5
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #5
Before buying a mid pipe you should make up your mind now what headers you plan on running. Long tubes or shorties. I made that mistake and now will be doing my exhaust over since I want LT since my power range will stay between 2-5500 rpms. LT's make more power at lower rpms then shorties, I wasted $$ for not waiting and planing.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 16, 2007
#6
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #6
Good points by all

Exhaust is mostly about sound :Word:

The most obvious exception is like Danny said
Your choice between Shorty & LT's

As for the mid pipe

I bet you would not see 5 rwhp difference between em all
and
I really do suspect ... it might be more closer to like only 2 or 3 rwhp

Grady
 
I

inphiniti

Active Member
Mar 15, 2003
412
3
28
Providence, RI
Sep 16, 2007
#7
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #7
again, just stickin my .02 in lol... i meant to say last nite its all personal prefernce... do u want ur car INSANELY loud at idle, @ 1500-2500rpms(a basic range for cruise) or do u want it to be loud, but mellow... its all what you want... im sure if u told what ur looking to get out of it... we can give u ideas of what you would want...

also there is a clip site around here, i always lose the damn link but im sure sum1 has it here
 

BitingSnake

New Member
Sep 11, 2007
6
0
0
Marengo, OH
Sep 16, 2007
#8
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #8
Thanks for all the great advice. Right now I basically just wont something thats going to sound better than my stock exhaust. I was told that the prochamber would make more power, so thats the way to go. I saw that it costs more than other o/r h pipes and because I dont have much money to spend right now I wanted to know if it was worth the extra money.

Would the power gains from LTs be noticable compared to shorties on a stock engine? I dont plan on doing much to the engine right now other than a C&L MAF system until i finish paying for school.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 16, 2007
#9
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #9
LT's make more hp/tq around the lower power range then shorties. There was a thread by Grady with graphs showing the difference between the two. At high rpms they were about equal on producing power. But farting around the streets at lower speeds/rpms lt produce better results.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Sep 16, 2007
#10
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #10
What model 'stang do you have? Auto or stick? Longtubes can be a nightmare on auto's. Put that info in your sig to help out when you ask future questions.

And welcome to StangNet by the way!

Wes
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 16, 2007
#11
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #11
BitingSnake said:
T
Would the power gains from LTs be noticable compared to shorties on a stock engine? I dont plan on doing much to the engine right now other than a C&L MAF system until i finish paying for school.
Click to expand...

I gotta tell you if you are watching the bucks and you are mainly stock

A meter of A N Y kind is not gonna produce much rwhp
so
Your performance bang for the buck spent is gonna be disappointing

I'd pass on the meter and look to a mod that yields more power

Grady
 

Trick95

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,298
0
47
Detroit, MI
Sep 16, 2007
#12
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #12
I've had one for quite some time now. It's a nice piece. Hard to explain to sound you get....not quite as loud as your standard x or h-pipe but sounds good at WOT. Only thing is it's a real tight fit with a driveshaft safety loop.
 

BitingSnake

New Member
Sep 11, 2007
6
0
0
Marengo, OH
Sep 16, 2007
#13
  • Sep 16, 2007
  • #13
Thanks again for all the great pointers. I did a little more research and with your help I pretty much know what exhaust setup im goin with now. Im gonna take the money i was gonna use for the MAF system and maybe get some gears. Probably be back with more questions and look forward to learning some more.

Thanks all
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
901
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2026
from6to8
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
169
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?