• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Procharger vs. Vortech

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtboy2k
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2006
G

gtboy2k

New Member
Jan 27, 2006
11
0
0
May 12, 2006
#1
  • May 12, 2006
  • #1
Hey all, this summer I plan on getting my mustang blown and and am thinking about going the centrifugal route. Usually the two I hear most talked about are the Procharger and Vortech. I was wondering the advantages/disadvantages of each, as well as the cheapest place to buy a quality kit. As of right now I am leaning toward the ATI setup because I would prefer an intercooler over an aftercooler. I am unsure if this makes a difference in which kit I should choose, but I currently have a cat-back on the car as well as plan to add a tb/plenum and 3.73 gears before the blower goes on. I greatly apreciate any info anyone can provide.

The best two places I have found to purchase so far are http://rpmoutlet.com/musv8ati.htmfor the Procharger and http://modularpowerhouse.com/product_info.php?cPath=49_50&products_id=121&osCsid=df303f26cd4ce18fbf0f3c54bf2750b3for the vortech.
 
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
May 12, 2006
#2
  • May 12, 2006
  • #2
Ya man i was gona do the same thing this summer. I bet they both rock i just want the one that screams the loudest. Oh ya if anyone can answere this question also i would appreciate it. Can my stock motor handle 10psi with an awsome tune. I was also gona port the heads and get cams with it, maybe some other stuff like pistons and rods, crank, headers. Sound good or bad what you think
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
May 12, 2006
#3
  • May 12, 2006
  • #3
don't forget MPH comes with EVERYTHING you need to install unlike a lot of other places that neglect certain details until order time
 
G

GT04Mustang

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
55
0
0
Savannah Ga
May 12, 2006
#4
  • May 12, 2006
  • #4
best thing to do is CALL THEM... can't beat that...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 12, 2006
#5
  • May 12, 2006
  • #5
So anyone know the advantages/disadvantages? One is "oiled by the engine"...one is self-lubricating.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 12, 2006
#6
  • May 12, 2006
  • #6
well they are both good S/C's most people will tell you that the procharger is junk due to the fact that they have seal problems or something like that, but thye hardly have any complaints about the vortech......
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
May 12, 2006
#7
  • May 12, 2006
  • #7
Well, i dunno if this help or not, but I remember reading an issue of MM&FF...I don't remember how long ago, but they showed that the most efficient centrifugal blower was the Vortech by a long shot. The procharger i think can run higher boost, but pound for pound, the Vortech I think is more efficient.





BTW, both blowers are loud. Get the S-Trim Vortech instead of the SQ (Quiet) and it'll be loud as hell.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 12, 2006
#8
  • May 12, 2006
  • #8
CENTENNIALSTANG said:
Ya man i was gona do the same thing this summer. I bet they both rock i just want the one that screams the loudest. Oh ya if anyone can answere this question also i would appreciate it. Can my stock motor handle 10psi with an awsome tune. I was also gona port the heads and get cams with it, maybe some other stuff like pistons and rods, crank, headers. Sound good or bad what you think
Click to expand...


your motor can be good to hold up to 400hp with a dead on tune but that is still running your motor on borrowed time other wise stick to a limit of 350-370hp range..........if you want to run 10psi i would aslo consider having an intrcooler...
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
May 12, 2006
#9
  • May 12, 2006
  • #9
OH, here you go. All the graphs and testing results


http://www.superchargersonline.com/images/tech/p1sc_report.pdf
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 12, 2006
#10
  • May 12, 2006
  • #10
A lot of people complain about the prochargers having seal problems, so maybe the Vortech would be a better choice. You can buy the modularpowerhouse mongoose kit for around $3800 that comes with everything you'll need, including the tune.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
May 12, 2006
#11
  • May 12, 2006
  • #11
One of the guys around here has a 97 Cobra with a Procharger and has had it rebuilt twice. It also throws belts quite often as well. I would go with the Vortech personally.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
May 12, 2006
#12
  • May 12, 2006
  • #12
it's been debated over and over, but the fact remains, the S trim is a better blower in terms of reliability and potential power over the P1sc. i'm not a Procharger hater, they make some good head units, the P1sc just isn't one of them. i do like the fact that Prochargers come with intercoolers tho. i'm not a fan of the Vortech aftercooler either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
350
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
529
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
B
03 GT Forged Internals info ect.
  • Borla2K3
  • Jan 24, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2019
Dark04GT
Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?