• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

professional products intake manifold 4.6 2v

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03stanggt
  • Start date Start date Mar 21, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Mar 23, 2006
#41
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #41
Mike that's really funny. Too bad his car blew up though. Thats like this guy I saw out at a local track, he just got a new Z06 and threw a NX 150HP wet shot, de-stroyed the intake..lol
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Mar 23, 2006
#42
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #42
Ive been running a NOS 125 shot for over a year with no problems. Personally I wouldnt choose dry. Why sacrifice the extra horsepower just to buy more fuel upgrades for nothing?

Oh and it is well documented that the ported systems can give hard lean spikes as well.

Point is there are risks with all three. I would take the aluminum intake with a wet kit and MAYBE a well tuned port system. Im not a fan of the dry kits. Seems to me no matter what you do theres going to be an instant where its lean before the cars fuel system can compensate.
 

MGSTANG

Founding Member
Aug 4, 2002
383
0
0
Palm Bay Fl
Mar 23, 2006
#43
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #43
And a nitrous backfire is also a stupid human error. Most of the time, backfires happen when the nitrous is sprayed to low in the RPM range. So the fuel puddles in the intake. Happened to me on my v6. But the reason was because I sprayed, let off because I was spinning like hell, then floored it again. And boom, the fuel was in the intake. IMO it just doesn't happen unless there's an error somewhere
 
U

Usernamegoshere

New Member
Mar 7, 2011
1
0
0
Mar 7, 2011
#44
  • Mar 7, 2011
  • #44
I just purchased and installed one i found used for my 2000 gt. Aside from the fact that I had to fab a new alternator bracket since the pre 01's had a slightly different bolt pattern, and having to re-tap some of the holes (could had been from previous owner cross threading) it fit decently.

My issue is as was said in previous posts, gutless under 5000. The intake runner design is appears the same just by quick inspection but around 3-5" shorter. I was in need of a new intake due to the common water crossover on the earlier intakes cracking.

My car is basically stock besides the usual bolt ons. Pulley's, long tubes, custom off road x pipe (stock cat back), Professional products upper intake w/ 75mm tb, 3.73's, and an sct dyno tuned. It made decent power at 271@5480 and 299 ft lbs@4020 for the mileage (100,000 bought new in 99) at a still somewhat fat 12:1- 11.8:1 a/f. This was with the factory intake. After the intake swap I took one test drive and parked it in disappointment. It did squat under 5000 and even then the torque lost was so shocking that I am in the market for cams or a stock 01+ intake lol. I will dyno it again to see if playing with the timing will help and to see exactly what was lost/gained. The only time it actually feels "so-so" is from the short 5500-6200 range, which at that point it's fighting the factory cams. Just seems pretty useless for a daily driven street car in my opinion.

Perhaps with cams it might perk up but I seriously doubt enough to compensate without the aid of forced induction. Just my thoughts and any feedback would be welcome.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
208
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
M
03 GT Misfire at idle only, calling all experts!
  • midnight03
  • Feb 27, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
878
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2024
midnight03
M
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?