• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Professional Products Intake ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MY 85 GT
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2010

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 12, 2010
#1
  • May 12, 2010
  • #1
Anyone running one?...How are they?..Im thinking of going with one on my turbo build...I have GT40 heads im thinking of the one that looks like the edelbrock will it work..or will i have problems with it? not fitting or bolting up right...
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
May 12, 2010
#2
  • May 12, 2010
  • #2
Its junk, the castings are terrible, cheap chinese crap, buy a used edelbrock if you wanna save money.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 12, 2010
#3
  • May 12, 2010
  • #3
Yea, I've heard the casting quality is really poor and they require a little clean up with a grinder or hand file. They're ugly, too. It's like a Bizzaro copy of the Edelbrock intake (Superman reference for all you nerds out there).

Why not just run an Explorer intake? They are super cheap and will flow more than enough air for those heads you're running.

EDIT: It looks like you already have a TF Track Heat intake. What's wrong with using that?
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 12, 2010
#4
  • May 12, 2010
  • #4
NikwoaC said:
Yea, I've heard the casting quality is really poor and they require a little clean up with a grinder or hand file. They're ugly, too. It's like a Bizzaro copy of the Edelbrock intake (Superman reference for all you nerds out there).

Why not just run an Explorer intake? They are super cheap and will flow more than enough air for those heads you're running.

EDIT: It looks like you already have a TF Track Heat intake. What's wrong with using that?
Click to expand...

No i dont have it yet,...LOL..i was going to pull the hammer on buying it but then i thought $500 for an intake...when i know a turbo will make up the difference..I had a really nice explorer intake i sold it what a mistake....
 
J

Jmunk

Member
Sep 30, 2007
95
1
6
May 12, 2010
#5
  • May 12, 2010
  • #5
I like the professional and the eldebrock intake for the sole reason you an pull the valve covers without having to pull the upper intake
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
May 12, 2010
#6
  • May 12, 2010
  • #6
if you are going turbo why arent you looking into a box style or short runner intake?
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
May 12, 2010
#7
  • May 12, 2010
  • #7
stykthyn said:
if you are going turbo why arent you looking into a box style or short runner intake?
Click to expand...
this.
90lxcoupe said:
Its junk, the castings are terrible, cheap chinese crap, buy a used edelbrock if you wanna save money.
Click to expand...
This also.
NikwoaC said:
Yea, I've heard the casting quality is really poor and they require a little clean up with a grinder or hand file. They're ugly, too. It's like a Bizzaro copy of the Edelbrock intake (Superman reference for all you nerds out there).

Why not just run an Explorer intake? They are super cheap and will flow more than enough air for those heads you're running.

EDIT: It looks like you already have a TF Track Heat intake. What's wrong with using that?
Click to expand...
And this as well.

from everything ive seen, theyre a cheap knock off, some guys will swear buy them but some guys also think CAIs are power adders. Why pay for something you have to modify just to make it function?

you get what you pay for every time...
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 12, 2010
#8
  • May 12, 2010
  • #8
stykthyn said:
if you are going turbo why arent you looking into a box style or short runner intake?
Click to expand...

I was told that..LOL..use a GT40 lower with a box upper ok where can i get one and how do they work im confussed about about a box upper...will i need a egr spacer to make that the same width as the stock or and other intake so i can use the inlet tubing that comes with the turbo kit?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
May 12, 2010
#9
  • May 12, 2010
  • #9
Here is a link to one for a stock manifold, but you can get them with the GT40 lower pattern as well. Hit up the tech guys at jegs or summit and they will answer all your questions. People also sell these used for dirt cheap.

Comp Cams VH050 Comp Polymers 5.0L Intake Powerbox
 

lancec2c30

Member
May 14, 2008
570
0
16
Washington
May 12, 2010
#10
  • May 12, 2010
  • #10
Box uppers look clean and work great with turbo setups.

I just hope those on3 headers don't fall apart on you....
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
May 12, 2010
#11
  • May 12, 2010
  • #11
lancec2c30 said:
Box uppers look clean and work great with turbo setups.

I just hope those on3 headers don't fall apart on you....
Click to expand...

Thanks I didnt buy it yet im watching everyones on3 build and keeping on eye out on them so far they look like they have great results...How long they last well thats another story..My GT isnt a daily so i might be ok ...
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
May 12, 2010
#12
  • May 12, 2010
  • #12
I have been running a Pro Products intake for 3 years now with no problems. Also run the GT40 heads with it and pulls hard. No casting or other wierd problems mentioned above.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
May 13, 2010
#13
  • May 13, 2010
  • #13
No issues here. When ported they will flow better than the Cobra intake(ported Cobra intake). I am happy with mine.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
May 13, 2010
#14
  • May 13, 2010
  • #14
fwiw I dont feel its any worse quality than the cobra intakes on the market now. They are even most likely made by the same people. Lots of guys run them and lots of guys are having great luck with them. To the OP, you seem to be jumping all over the place with your build. Rather than ask a bunch of online enthusiasts I would suggest contacting a professional builder such as Jay Allen, Buddy Rawls, or someone else of the like. For a small fee you can fill out an online form and they will tell you EXACTLY what parts to get so that your engine will perform EXACTLY as you wanted to. Takes away all the guess work and you know that you will have the optimum build your budget will allow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
668
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
248
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
505
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
254
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
N
89 LX 5.0 Fuel Rail Recommendations
  • Ncarter
  • Oct 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
403
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2025
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?