• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

pros and cons 5.0 vs 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter blzn04fx4
  • Start date Start date Jun 4, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

blzn04fx4

New Member
Jun 2, 2010
50
0
0
iowa
Jun 4, 2010
#1
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #1
i just wanna know what the best of the two motors and the worst are. ive always been a 5.0 person but this might help me decide on my next purchase. just throw it all out there.
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Jun 4, 2010
#2
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #2
Modular 5.0, or push rod 5.0?

Push rod 5.0 makes full torque at around 3000rpm.
4.6 makes full torque at 4000 rpm. 4.10's will help that.

Both great engines that can easily surpass 200k miles if treated right.

4.6 seems to make more horsepower under forced induction applications. 450 whp safely. 5.0 don,t quote me on this, but i think they make about 350-400 safely?

H/C/I 5.0 makes around 300 rwhp.
4.6 can make close to 300 rwhp with stock heads.
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Jun 4, 2010
#3
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #3
99-04 have the performance heads!

96-98 have non PI heads.
 

blzn04fx4

New Member
Jun 2, 2010
50
0
0
iowa
Jun 4, 2010
#4
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #4
is it more expensive to to mod the 4.6? and are they more difficult to work on?
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Jun 4, 2010
#5
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #5
I think each engine has it's pros and cons.

Regular maintenance I'd take the 4.6 any day. Easy as H to change the spark plugs, plug wires, coil packs, serpentine belt, etc...

As for mods, the 5.0's are easier to mod and have more parts available (only 1 aftermarket cylinder head available at this time for the 4.6). For example, I'd never want to try and install headers on my 4.6, a cylinder head swap is also more involved because of the timing chains, etc...

Overall, however, you can't beat the driveability of the 4.6 modulars. They idle smooth as butta, are easier on gas, and if maintained right will run well over 200K miles and not leak one drip of oil. With full bolt on's and a nice set of cams, a 5-speed PI 4.6 will be very close to 300 RWHP.

Another thing to consider is torque. Get the 5.0 if you like the low down grunt. Get the 4.6 if you like to wind it out.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Jun 4, 2010
#6
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #6
Oh here we go!

I see this turning into a 6 page flame fest.

Anyway, I like traits of both engines, that's one reason I have one of each.

I like my 4.6 because it's smooth, sounds good, runs decent, and is reliable, and I like the car because it makes a nice daily driver.

I like my 5.0 because it's rowdy (it is modded though) sounds good (in a different way than the 4.6 though), runs real good (quicker than my 04, though to be fair the 04 is pretty much stock), and is also reliable even with aftermarket stuff all over it. I like the car because it's more raw and reminiscent of old cars like my 68, it's light, and has power, and that makes it fun. It definitely responds better to mods than a 4.6.

I guess it depends on what you really want out of a car.
 

blzn04fx4

New Member
Jun 2, 2010
50
0
0
iowa
Jun 4, 2010
#7
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #7
this prolly sounds dumb but whats the pi heads are those like post 99 or something
 

BlackStang03

New Member
Mar 26, 2010
204
1
0
Ohio
Jun 4, 2010
#8
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #8
blzn04fx4 said:
this prolly sounds dumb but whats the pi heads are those like post 99 or something
Click to expand...

performance heads, stands for power improved
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Jun 4, 2010
#9
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • #9
BlackStang03 said:
performance heads, stands for power improved
Click to expand...

Exactly right.

Take it from a guy that has both, if you want ease of mods and cheap speed and fun, buy a fox 5.0.

If you want a nice DD that looks like sex, buy a new edge 4.6.
 

Ponyup1

Banned
May 27, 2010
217
0
0
Adams,MA
Jun 5, 2010
#10
  • Jun 5, 2010
  • #10
Parts cost more for the 4.6L mustangs.
Parts cost less for the 5.0 mustangs.
The 4.6L mustangs are well known for their dependability/reliability.
In my experience the 5.0 mustangs are not known for
their dependability/reliability.
The 4.6L mustangs have higher resale value.
The 5.0 mustangs have slightly lower resale value.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
Jun 5, 2010
#11
  • Jun 5, 2010
  • #11
You need to have heads and cam to run a 5.0 into 12s where as bolt on p.i. will run that. But yes mods are cheaper on a 5.0 but you need more of them to run with the mild 4.6. I do think my next car I pick up is going to be a white fox coupe, but it will be getting a carb'd mod motor
 

slick35thgt

New Member
Oct 5, 2009
213
0
0
Leitchfield, KY
Jun 6, 2010
#12
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #12
4.6 = Strong running DD street car

5.0 = Take a few bucks, buy bolt-ons, enjoy a fast car on a budget.

I've had two Fox car's and my '99 PI, currently a 5.4L car. My '99 is definately my favorite but aside from stuff like changing the plugs, the 5.0 cars are SOOOO much easier to work with. Modular motors can really leave you pulling your hair out when you start digging into the internals vs. the pushrod 5.0.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 6, 2010
#13
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #13
get a new 5.0 and forget about the windsor 302.
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jun 6, 2010
#14
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #14
Many 5.0 guys build there cars to be quick NA cars. Many 4.6 guys use forced induction to be quick. That's where the GM guys come in and say we're cheating
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 6, 2010
#15
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #15
slick35thgt said:
4.6 = Strong running DD street car

5.0 = Take a few bucks, buy bolt-ons, enjoy a fast car on a budget.

I've had two Fox car's and my '99 PI, currently a 5.4L car. My '99 is definately my favorite but aside from stuff like changing the plugs, the 5.0 cars are SOOOO much easier to work with. Modular motors can really leave you pulling your hair out when you start digging into the internals vs. the pushrod 5.0.
Click to expand...

Modulars are simple to work on.. I think some guys get intimidated by timing two cams but it's so simple.. Once you do one you realize it's really easy
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
Jun 6, 2010
#16
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #16
I agree with mike97 100%.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 6, 2010
#17
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #17
ninjastang125 said:
I agree with mike97 100%.
Click to expand...

in my opinion they are easier to work on then the old SBF.. none of the problems with water pump bolts breaking off in timing covers or oil leaks all over the place that we used to see with those.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jun 6, 2010
#18
  • Jun 6, 2010
  • #18
Either one is a great motor.

The 5.0 has a way better return on power to dollars once you start doing heads/cam(s)/intake swaps.

Both are very reliable in stock form. It's pointless to try and figure out if the 5.0 or 4.6 will run longer, because chances are you will never exceed the life of either engine unless you senselessly beat the crap out of it every day.

5.0's will hold upwards of 500rwhp well tuned before the block becomes the weak point and splits.

The 2v 4.6 will hold 400-450rwhp well tuned depending on who you talk to before the pistons or rods become the weak point.

The modular block is FAR superior in strength to a regular 5.0 block. However, parts for a 4.6. are far more expensive. Two cams versus one, two timing chains, tensioners, etc. The stock GT crank is very stout, and Cobra cranks are supposedly good to 1,000rwhp or more. Won't find that in a 5.0 based engine.

5.0 parts are a dime a dozen, 4.6 parts are becoming more common, but not quite as easy to come by as 5.0 parts.

I would say they are about the same in terms of working on them. The shortblock of a 4.6 would be simpler to install than a 5.0 simply because there is no cam to put in the block. The top end of a 5.0 would be easier since the heads are smaller, lifters are in the shortblock, etc. as long as you understand how a pushrod motor works.

5.0 is way more compact of a motor, lighter as well. A 2v 4.6 is the size of some big block engines.

4.6 is much smoother running of an engine. Very refined. The 5.0 is a little rough around the edges but nothing bad.

Stock for stock, the best 5.0 put into a Mustang (say a 5.0 Cobra) will fall off in power before a PI 4.6 (99-04 GT).
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jun 7, 2010
#19
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • #19
slayerripkdc said:
H/C/I 5.0 makes around 300 rwhp.
4.6 can make close to 300 rwhp with stock heads.
Click to expand...

Don't sleep on 4.6 4v with full exhaust, CAI, cams and tuning they can make 360+ rwhp...more expensive for sure but it can be done pretty easily, then if you add a ported intake you'll be closer to 370 rwhp with better power across the entire cure and this is without touching the heads.

Anything is possible with money though.
 

slick35thgt

New Member
Oct 5, 2009
213
0
0
Leitchfield, KY
Jun 7, 2010
#20
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • #20
Mike97gt said:
Modulars are simple to work on.. I think some guys get intimidated by timing two cams but it's so simple.. Once you do one you realize it's really easy
Click to expand...

Hm, I never had to dig into head swap with my swap, I got my 5.4 in ready to go longblock form. I just heard horror stories about getting the two cams timed. In retrospect this bit of insight was gathered from a die-hard pushrod guy, so his fear is understandable haha.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
PCM problem
  • Rjchild9
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
170
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
Rjchild9
R
S
1990 foxbody 5.0 fuel system.
  • staceyj
  • Nov 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
374
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
301
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
666
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
D
4.8 LS swap in a 1975 coupe
  • DFlikks
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
8
Views
537
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 21, 2025
DFlikks
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?