• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Pros and cons of different stroker motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victor's GT
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 27, 2006
#21
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #21
A 347 will not last as long as a 302.

Will it last a long time. Sure.

As Barry at Survival Motorsports says, he isn't a big fan of the pin intersecting the oil ring for a street car.

If you go 347, get the 5.315" rod and get a good builder.
 

83Mustang427TT

New Member
Jan 18, 2006
162
0
0
Jul 28, 2006
#22
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #22
I stand corrected
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jul 28, 2006
#23
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #23
It's hard to argue with a 393. 351's are everywhere, I got one complete and running for $200, and it even came with it's own method of transportation via the Bronco it was running in.

UPR 351 intake ~ $300 on ebay not polished.
3.85 crank ~ $200
factory 302 pistons ~ dirt cheap
351 crown vic oil pan ~ $40 - www.car-part.com
solid motor mounts for clearance ~ $40 shipped ebay.
157t 28oz flywheel ~ $100 shipped ebay
28oz balancer ~ $70 shipped ebay
Swap headers ~ $300, or cut/lengthen your downpipes shouldn't cost you more than $50
Miscellanious rebuild stuff ~ $250.

So for give or take $1200 plus what you pay for the engine you've got 393 cubes under the hood, You're going to be hard pressed to beat that price going with a 302 based stroker instead.
 

Victor's GT

Member
Jul 24, 2006
44
2
7
New Jersey
Jul 28, 2006
#24
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #24
If I were for certain that a 331-347 was going to give me the power that I am looking for by just swapping my existing parts over to a Dart block, there would be no question as to should I go 302 based or 351 based. Now if I am going to have to buy different heads and intake for 331-347 to get me what I want, I may as well get a 351 base and buy those same parts for it.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jul 29, 2006
#25
  • Jul 29, 2006
  • #25
It seems to me the price of going 331 or 347 out of a 302 block is about the same as doing a 351 swap and making a 393 out of it.
If you're talking Dart block the stroked 302 will be more expensive. A Dart block isn't ready to go when you buy it, you also have alot of prep work to pay for at the machine shop prior to building the motor.

on the upside to the factory 351 it's certainly stronger than the factory 302 block. How it compares to the Dart version I can't say. But if I'm not mistaken the Dart 302 block is about as heavy as the factory 351? So it's nice to have those extra cubes for extra power to offset the extra weight.

Like I said before, it just seems to me that it's hard to argue with a 393.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Engine Motor Rebuild Help
  • James.Little
  • Mar 10, 2015
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
961
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2015
James.Little
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
Finally! A valid TFS-R and TFS Box R intake dyno comparison on a street stroker.
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 19, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
38K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 6, 2025
FastDriver
First 2015 Ford Mustang To Auction For Charity
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 21, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 21, 2013
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?