• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Prothane motor mounts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edbert
  • Start date Start date Jan 17, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 17, 2006
#1
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #1
Finally got them installed, they seem to me to be a perfect blend of the strenght of a solid with SOME of the dampening of a soft.

 

Attachments

  • prothanemotormount.webp
    80.4 KB · Views: 228

0to100to0

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
100
0
0
Jan 17, 2006
#2
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #2
trying to decide.....

how do you like them?
I was think about those or using the stock mounts with a torque strap.

how is the engine height compared to stock?

matt
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Jan 17, 2006
#3
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #3
what about those they have in mustangs plus that are the bolt through design with polyurethane bushings? I think i'm gonna try those out....only downside is they are like $250
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 17, 2006
#4
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #4
of the three mounts spoken about here, i prefer the mounts from mustangs plus as i think they are better overall. the prothane mounts are second best as they have similar characteristics as far as safety in case the mount breaks, but they have the advantage of being less expensive. stock mounts i would leave to restorations.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jan 17, 2006
#5
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #5


Your missing a bolt in your frame bracket.

John
 

Attachments

  • prothanemotormount.webp
    80.4 KB · Views: 538

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 17, 2006
#6
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #6
Opentracker said:
Your missing a bolt in your frame bracket.
Click to expand...
Nope, there was some sort of small little sub-bracket bolted to the frame mounted portion, I don't know what it was for (possibly a line retainer of some sort ofr power steering?)and I left it off. That is what that hole is for. If you look REAL closely you can just make out the black bolt poking out from behind the shadow made by the flash, that is the upper of the two frame bolts, I can also see the shaft of the upper bolt also hidden in the shadow. The lower of the two is hidden behind the steering input shaft.

EDIT, the hole you see without a bolt is way too small for the frame bolts. Here's a better shot of the passenger side.

 

Attachments

  • prothanemotormount2.webp
    101.2 KB · Views: 464
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jan 17, 2006
#7
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #7
Sorry, my mistake, we use the early three piece mounts. Looks like one of those holes.

John
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 17, 2006
#8
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #8
No problem, I love knowing guys like you are watching my back!
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Jan 17, 2006
#9
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #9
Edbert said:
Finally got them installed, they seem to me to be a perfect blend of the strenght of a solid with SOME of the dampening of a soft.
Click to expand...

I have also used them more than once and they have always fit right and not as harsh as solid mounts. Best of both worlds, IMO.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jan 17, 2006
#10
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #10
DarkoStoj said:
what about those they have in mustangs plus that are the bolt through design with polyurethane bushings? I think i'm gonna try those out....only downside is they are like $250
Click to expand...

Those are the Ron Morris, TCP knock offs. But they did do something nice in the process by allowing adjustment for cars that aren't so straight. Which is about 95% of 'em. I'm not so sure they are as strong because of it, but it's logical.
 
R

Robdogg67

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
148
0
0
Seattle/Tacoma, WA
Jan 17, 2006
#11
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #11
Looks great Edbert and extra functional at a fair price (Summit $93). I noticed them a few months back and was considering them for the AOD mount. If it's good enough for Edbert's car, its good enough for me. I'll put the engine and tranny kit on the grocery list for the impending swap.
 
1

19stang66

Member
Apr 16, 2003
689
0
16
Jan 17, 2006
#12
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #12
Why would you use prothane motor mounts over stock ones? I'm wondering because I am taking my enigne out soon and when i put it back in i'd like to upgrade now if i have to. My car isnt going to be strip only, just a DD with some power. Can I still use my stock mounts? Thanks.
 
R

Robdogg67

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
148
0
0
Seattle/Tacoma, WA
Jan 17, 2006
#13
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #13
In my case and maybe yours 19stang, I'm putting in a new motor and tranny and basically want to see all new stuff in there within reason. I also have no idea how old my stock mounts are and the new engine will be over twice the HP so new and improved mounts are probably a good idea anyway. For me, well worth the $125 to do the tranny and engine right the first time.
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Jan 17, 2006
#14
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #14
Edbert,
I'm guessing from your sig that you've got a 67.
In researching mounts for my 67 it appears that the commonly available mounts don't work due to a unique frame bracket (sorry if this has been already addressed before here) for 67s.
The Prothane mount doesn't appear to be available for our "special" cars.
Did you find a 67-specific mount, or perhaps change your frame brackets to 68s?
Joe
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Jan 17, 2006
#15
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #15
I'm considering one of the following two systems.
The RMP design offers adjustment but I wonder if the adjustment features may work loose with time.
The TCP design has no adjustability but is more expensive. It does have 3 frame bolts over the RMP 2-bolt design.
Anybody have history with either of these two?
Are these too harsh for street use?

Ron Morris Performance from Mustangs Plus, $200:


Total Control Products design from Autoworks International, $250
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Jan 17, 2006
#16
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #16
joesgt281 said:
The TCP design has no adjustability but is more expensive. It does have 3 frame bolts over the RMP 2-bolt design.
Click to expand...

My builder tried the TCP mounts first in my 70 Boss 302 and they did not fit. I cannot recall why since it has been over 1 year ago. He returned them and purchased the Prothane mounts and they fit. I also remember a couple of posts at another website indicating clearance issues...anybody recall anything?
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jan 17, 2006
#17
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #17
joesgt281 said:
Total Control Products design from Autoworks International, $250
Click to expand...

That's $50 over MSRP!
 
R

Robdogg67

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
148
0
0
Seattle/Tacoma, WA
Jan 17, 2006
#18
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #18
In the 5.o tech there was mention of interference with these motor mounts and Canton oil pans and some headers hitting them too, whats new.

Looks like Edbert has a Milidon 7 or 8qt pan which must clear. I think I remember him trimming a curved tab on the car bracket mounts or something to clear the p/t mounts.

Edbert, did you notice if these new mounts raised or lowered the motor compare to stock motor mount height?
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jan 17, 2006
#19
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #19
I've got the prothane, and love them. They give me that more safe feeling since I've already busted a set of stockers once They act like stockers except they have the poly instead of rubber and incase of a poly give up they have a metal strap over top of everything to act like a solid unit if the poly was to give way....now thats a run on sentence lol
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Jan 18, 2006
#20
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #20
steel1212 said:
I've got the prothane, and love them. They give me that more safe feeling since I've already busted a set of stockers once They act like stockers except they have the poly instead of rubber and incase of a poly give up they have a metal strap over top of everything to act like a solid unit if the poly was to give way....now thats a run on sentence lol
Click to expand...

Yes i definetly like the added security of that design but I may have to change my frame brackets over to 68s to be able to use them on my 67.
Joe
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Motor mounts question
  • djj62478
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
425
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
nickyb
M
Looking for a passenger side AC Compressor mount
  • mustangTodd
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
90
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 10, 2026
mustangTodd
M
T
Fox *Solved* Motor mount bolt question
  • TDM389
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TDM389
T
D
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
233
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
B
Issue with trans mount not lining up with crossmember slots
  • Bbaker2317
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
748
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?