• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Putting IAT in the MAF

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95strokerPSU
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

95strokerPSU

Member
Jul 29, 2004
986
1
19
Sacramento from Philly
Jan 22, 2007
#1
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #1
Just wondering if it would mess up my LMAF if I drill a hole in it for the IAT. I decided on where I'm going to mount the meter and filter....


Inside the fender...


If it's alright to put it in the MAF, I won't have to run the IAT wiring into the engine compartment.

Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0233.webp
    53.6 KB · Views: 144
  • IMG_0235.webp
    53.4 KB · Views: 183

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jan 22, 2007
#2
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #2
My gut tells me not to do it, but if you can drill into the housing without it cracking or such I don't necessarily see a problem either.

I'm not sure how the housing is built, where the sample tube ends, if there are layers etc, so drilling might ruin the housing, I honestly don't know.

But like I said, I wouldn't, maybe someone knows more about the housing designs?
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Jan 22, 2007
#3
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #3
i wouldnt do it
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Jan 22, 2007
#4
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #4
95strokerPSU said:
Click to expand...

Wow your engine bay....
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0233.webp
    53.6 KB · Views: 170

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jan 22, 2007
#5
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #5
The only problem is

#1 the housing is not very thick, so tapping the threads will not be easy. You will be lucky to get maybe one or 2 threads.

#2 the maf works by using a simple ratio. the air that passes through the sample tube is x percent of the entire housing. With the sensor installed, it will change the entire housing's flow. Essentially, making the maf think it's getting more air than it is, and thusly a rich condition will occur.

#3 Since the computer doesn't calculate a/f at WOT and/or open loop, it will be affected. How much? I don't have a clue.

#4 You would really have to make a standoff of sorts, since the sensor has 1/2" of threads and most of the body of the threads would be inside the maf, creating a lot more turbulence.

All is possible when you set your mind to it. If you were serious about it, you need to make a standoff and tap threads onto it, and glue it to the maf; Only the "V" and the element need be in the airflow path. They make glue specifically for plastic, one that actually eats away at the plastic very slightly, making a very strong bond.

After it's installed, you need to get hooked up to a wideband and test to see how much it has affected your a/f. I can only guess, but if you put the sensor at the back of the maf, behind the sample tube but across from it, I would guess it would have the least effect there. Then the wake left over from the sensor would not affect the sample tube (so I think anyway).

Another idea would be to extend the pipe that the filter attaches to, so you have some area of pipe (non-visible) that you can attach the sensor to instead. I think that idea is a little better.
Scott
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Jan 22, 2007
#6
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #6
What the F^ does that stupid little sensor do and how do you know its even working.?
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Jan 22, 2007
#7
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #7
From my research on MAFs it wouldn't be a very good idea. They are very sensitive to intake bends and such, so I won't want to run a risk of the IAT sensor affecting the MAF in any way. As you probably know the MAF is one of the most important sensors in the way the car runs and performs, althought they all work together, the MAF is one sensor that you don't want distorted readings. I wouldn't do it.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 22, 2007
#8
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #8
I wouldn't do it!

Just put it in the pipe where it belongs so it does its job correctly.

Grady
 

95strokerPSU

Member
Jul 29, 2004
986
1
19
Sacramento from Philly
Jan 23, 2007
#9
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #9
mo_dingo said:
Another idea would be to extend the pipe that the filter attaches to, so you have some area of pipe (non-visible) that you can attach the sensor to instead. I think that idea is a little better.
Scott
Click to expand...

I wish I had more room in the fender, but if you look at the second picture, you'll see the filter is right up against the fender.

I guess I'll just drill into the pipe and try to keep it as non-visible as possible.

Thanks guys.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 23, 2007
#10
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #10
Put it under the power pipe you made. Nobody will see it looking at the motor.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jan 23, 2007
#11
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #11
VibrantRedGT said:
Put it under the power pipe you made. Nobody will see it looking at the motor.
Click to expand...

Yeah I thought of that, drilling the hole on the bottom, and using a lot of heat shrink and tape, running the wires under the power pipe into the fender.
 

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jan 23, 2007
#12
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #12
yobi1kanobi said:
What the F^ does that stupid little sensor do and how do you know its even working.?
Click to expand...

IIRC, based on the reading the computer gets from the sensor timing is adjusted. When I installed my S/C I was told by my tuner that the sensor HAD to be in the discharge tube, and not in the intake before. This is because air coming into the engine before hitting the compressor is roughly air temperature, but after it goes through the S/C it is much hotter, and that's the temperature the computer needs to know, because that's what is going into your engine.

My tuner showed me all of this on his fancy schmancy program stuff, it was a difference in I think of over 50 degrees, I want to say more like 75, but I can't remember for sure.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Jan 23, 2007
#13
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #13
don't the newer style MAF's such as the LMAF you have, have the IAT built into them? thats why theres 6 wires on the newer ones and only 4 on our stock ones. couldnt that be wired in as long as you have a custom chip/tweecer?? (or am i completly comfused?)
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jan 24, 2007
#14
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #14
fiveohh94gt said:
don't the newer style MAF's such as the LMAF you have, have the IAT built into them? thats why theres 6 wires on the newer ones and only 4 on our stock ones. couldnt that be wired in as long as you have a custom chip/tweecer?? (or am i completly comfused?)
Click to expand...
yup the newer sensors have IAT built in. i dont know anything about making them functional on our cars tho
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 24, 2007
#15
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #15
Someone could ohm the LMAF's integral IAT sensor out (it's terminals are on each end of the connector, IIRC. I'm not real sure on that though) and see how the calibration is compared to the stocker, I suppose. I really doubt it's calibrated for our cars though.
Don, that burning in your ears is us wondering about this.

One caveat with ohming out any stang IAT is that the ambient temps need to be decent (readings get inaccurate when it's real cold. That might be an issue this time of year).

Good luck.
 

95strokerPSU

Member
Jul 29, 2004
986
1
19
Sacramento from Philly
Jan 24, 2007
#16
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #16
fiveohh94gt said:
don't the newer style MAF's such as the LMAF you have, have the IAT built into them? thats why theres 6 wires on the newer ones and only 4 on our stock ones. couldnt that be wired in as long as you have a custom chip/tweecer?? (or am i completly comfused?)
Click to expand...

I was wondering about that too.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jan 24, 2007
#17
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #17
when i first got this car the guy before me had the IAT mounted in the fender, not in the intake tubing and it ran fine. Couldn't you just mount it in the fender and not in the pipe because the air in the fender is the same temperature going into the pipe. I can't see a huge change in temp between two inches in a pipe as apposed to in the space in the fender
 

95strokerPSU

Member
Jul 29, 2004
986
1
19
Sacramento from Philly
Jan 24, 2007
#18
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #18
ProKiller said:
when i first got this car the guy before me had the IAT mounted in the fender, not in the intake tubing and it ran fine. Couldn't you just mount it in the fender and not in the pipe because the air in the fender is the same temperature going into the pipe. I can't see a huge change in temp between two inches in a pipe as apposed to in the space in the fender
Click to expand...

I was thinking that also, but does air need to be rushing past it to get an accurate reading?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 24, 2007
#19
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #19
95strokerPSU said:
I was thinking that also, but does air need to be rushing past it to get an accurate reading?
Click to expand...

This is correct.

Also, the air can get heat soaked while in the CAI for the short time it's there. The temp delta from inside the CAI vs outside can be huge (at least for me - I've done some high desert testing while it was 115*F outside).

Just MHO.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jan 24, 2007
#20
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #20
Another thing to remember is that they put the IAT much closer to the TB in the foxes for a reason. Our computer obviously compensates in it's programming with the new location in the intake tube 1 1/2 feet away from the TB.
Scott
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
872
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
177
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
201
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
L
Drivetrain 2000 GT High Idle - Pulling Out Hair - Help
  • lleonard1185
  • Jan 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
571
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 4, 2025
Leo090
L
Electrical/engine bay harness questions
  • djj62478
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
236
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
djj62478
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?