• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

QUAD SHOCKS ON 88VERT

  • Thread starter Thread starter KGOFF
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2008
K

KGOFF

New Member
Nov 25, 2007
63
0
0
nj
Mar 2, 2008
#1
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #1
Afternoon,
Are the quad shocks really necessary? I have upgraded the entire rear suspension (control arms, shocks, springs, etc) minus the quads. I see they run about $200 for the set.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Mar 2, 2008
#2
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #2
some can live w/o them some need them. most threads I have read need them, you get rear wheel hop and maybe some other sloppy traits. I don't know who sells them for tha much unless you are lookng at bilstiens or koni maybe? most local store have them but i got them at my local ford dealer 94 and up to around 99 maybe don't remeber off hand mustang's work I think they where 1996 ones since that's how far back they could look, they where identical to the old rusty stock ones on my 91 and they where about $40 bucks each.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,200
17,890
224
Massachusetts
Mar 2, 2008
#3
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #3
Yes they are necessary on some cars. It's hit or miss

$200/set?? Where are you looking?

Gabriels from Autozone are $25/each. They are listed under "steering dampener" in the computer
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 2, 2008
#4
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #4
I hope I don't need them on my 81 with the 2001 drivetrain. I don't have the holes in the frame rail for them. I forgot to weld them on...and I just put gas in the tank and ran it last night. I am really nervous now to weld next to it.
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Mar 2, 2008
#5
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #5
Why not drill? Granted drilling the frame isn't the easiest thing in the world, but with a good drill and bit, and using some PB blaster to keep the bit cool, you should have no problem. The stock ones are drilled into the frame.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Mar 2, 2008
#6
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #6
Put the quad shocks back on if you took them off or don’t have them installed.

The quad shocks are a roll of the dice. No matter what the combination of tires, control arms and shocks, some cars will wheel hop without quad shocks and some won't. There are so many variables in 28-13 year old cars with wear, misalignment and combinations of suspension components and tires that one unchanging answer won't work for everyone.

I personally would install them, and make sure they are in good shape. I do know this, that Ford is cheap. If they could have made changes in some simple component like bushings or control arm construction and saved $10, they would have done it. Multiply $10 times all the Fox body Mustangs ever made and you would be almost as rich as Donald Trump. That's a lot of $$$, and good incentive to engineer something to do away with the quad shocks.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 2, 2008
#7
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #7
Fett said:
Why not drill? Granted drilling the frame isn't the easiest thing in the world, but with a good drill and bit, and using some PB blaster to keep the bit cool, you should have no problem. The stock ones are drilled into the frame.
Click to expand...

I really want to do that. But the foxes that have them have a thick reinforcement bracket inside the frame rail. Since my car is an 81 it does not have quad shocks, nor does it have the provision for them. If I drill a hole I will have to use a sheet metal bolt. I don't think that that would last over time with squealing the tires/hitting bumps and pot holes. I can't nut and bolt it either because of the gas tank. I don't want to rub a hole in the tank where the bolt goes through.

I have welded right by the gas tank before on the car when it was empty. I know fumes is more dangerous than gasoline itself, but I was ok. I just layed wet carboard in front of the area. I might try that. Man....it still makes me nervous though.
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Mar 2, 2008
#8
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #8
quads are a MUST from my experience. granted i dont have any suspension stuff yet, but just putting on new ones made an incredible difference for me. went from terrible wheel hop to almost none now
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,200
17,890
224
Massachusetts
Mar 2, 2008
#9
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #9
jrichker said:
I I do know this, that Ford is cheap. If they could have made changes in some simple component like bushings or control arm construction and saved $10, they would have done it. Multiply $10 times all the Fox body Mustangs ever made and you would be almost as rich as Donald Trump. That's a lot of $$$, and good incentive to engineer something to do away with the quad shocks.
Click to expand...


Bingo.


If it was a matter of changing the bushings in the control arms, Ford would have done it. Bushings are cheap compared to entire shock units. They would have saved a lot of money. They really are there for a reason so leave them.


I'm glad to see the "quad shock can be removed" myth is starting to die.
 
K

KGOFF

New Member
Nov 25, 2007
63
0
0
nj
Mar 2, 2008
#10
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #10
Thanks
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 2, 2008
#11
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #11
Removed. No problems. Aftermarket shocks and uppers and lower control arms. They were old and I never put them back on when I pulled out the rear in my car and switched it with a built one we built.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Bent Rear Spring Perches
  • Miozu
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
345
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
PSKSAM2
P
28"x9" tire clearance
  • Sparky714
  • Jun 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
761
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2025
Sparky714
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
683
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
299
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?