• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Question about my stroker motor...

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlooDReigN
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2005

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 26, 2005
#1
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #1
Hey guys, sorry if this has been answered somewhere else but i did a good bit of searching and didn't come up with much.

Anyway, heres the deal. I have a DSS Pro Bullet 408W stroker kit and I have a line on a 69 351W block. Can anybody tell me if this stroker kit I have will work with both a 2 piece and 1 piece rear main seal? If it works with the 2 piece then I can go ahead and buy this 351W block and get finished up with my project....Thanks!
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 26, 2005
#2
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #2
The only difference should be in the actual seal.

Congrats on the 69 block!
That is the dream of everyone who loves the 351w blocks.

jason
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 26, 2005
#3
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #3
I'm no expert nor do I claim to be but I would think the rotating assembly will work regardless you'll just need to buy the proper rear main seal for the block.

Good luck on your project $ounds fast
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 26, 2005
#4
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #4
I'm just curious because some kits say they are just for 1 piece rear main seals and some say they are for both, but DSS doesn't specify on their site or anything.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Dec 26, 2005
#5
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #5
Ask DSS they WILL know,.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 26, 2005
#6
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #6
Most aftermarket stroker cranks will work with both, best to double check since DSS uses various cranks suppliers. I've heard about the odd ball aftermarket crank made for 2 piece seal but I have never seen one.

The biggest issue is what deck height is the kit you have made for? If it is a 4" stroke, 6.2" rod, 1.300CH piston is it is made for a 9.5" deck height block 1971-present. The 69-70 blocks are 9.48"

Here's how you can tell

Take half the stroke + rod length + CH of the piston = DECK HEIGHT
 

retro50

New Member
Jul 15, 2003
191
0
0
Plymouth,MA
Dec 26, 2005
#7
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #7
The difference will be the oil slinger on the back of the crank. If it doesn't have one it will fit either block early and late. If it does have one it will only fit the early 2 piece seal blocks. I took a 289 crank and cut the slinger off and put it in a roller block and made a 289 roller motor I also used the 289 rods.
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 26, 2005
#8
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #8
Is that deck height going to cause me any big problems rick? I'm pretty sure my rotating assembly is for a 9.5" deck height, but I'm not 100% sure.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2005
#9
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #9
BlooDReigN said:
Is that deck height going to cause me any big problems rick? I'm pretty sure my rotating assembly is for a 9.5" deck height, but I'm not 100% sure.
Click to expand...

The piston,MIGHT end up whackin' in to the head,or it might just give you a tigher quench and more compression.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 26, 2005
#10
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #10
if it is already 9.48 it means the piston will be .020" out of the bore which is too far, then if you have to deck the block to get it square and straight it will be even worse. They make kits for 9.48" heights...
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2005
#11
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #11
Rick 91GT said:
if it is already 9.48 it means the piston will be .020" out of the bore which is too far, then if you have to deck the block to get it square and straight it will be even worse. They make kits for 9.48" heights...
Click to expand...

That kinda sucks...

But you can use a 9.48" kit in a 9.5" block,the piston would just be in the bore more.
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 26, 2005
#12
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #12
Well the piston sits inside the bore a bit doesn't it? As long as the piston doesn't go any higher than the deck it should be fine, shouldn't it?
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2005
#13
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #13
BlooDReigN said:
Well the piston sits inside the bore a bit doesn't it? As long as the piston doesn't go any higher than the deck it should be fine, shouldn't it?
Click to expand...

Well,generaly yes.

But in other instances you CAN have the piston come out of the bore a little,say a lower rpm steel roded motor with say a .040 compressed thickness head gaskets.

But lets say you are spining high rpms and got alum. rods,then you need it in the bore a bit as the rods will actualy "stretch".
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 27, 2005
#14
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #14
If you have a kit made for 9.5" and your block is already at 9.48" it means the piston is out of the bore already .020" so it takes the quench with a .040" gasket to .020" which is too tight.

I haven't found a stock FORD block that has been straight so it will most likely need to be decked, which will push the piston out of the bore even more. This also make the top rin come closer to the deck which isn;t good for sealing on a power adder car.

I would have the block checked to see what the exact height is, have them check to make sure it is square and if it is not find out how much they are going to have to deck it. If the block is straight you could mill the tops of the pistons .020" depending on the brand, cap thickness, etc...

You really want the piston even with the deck of the block, this is called "0" and will yeild the best quench area (space between the piston and the head) for a STEEL ROD combo. With a Alum rod I would try to keep the pistons .012-.028 in the bore depending on the application.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Dec 27, 2005
#15
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #15
I have a 69' blocked 418 stroker. I had the block before the rotating assembly however. I dont remember how much was taken off, but it did have to be decked. Witch meant..............$800 custom JE pistons . If I had already purchased a stroker kit, I would have checked into milling the pistons. I would call D.S.S. directly and find out what they would recomend, AFTER, getting the block checked. FWIW, I would do what is financially in you're range to make the block work. I also had the lower half of mine hardblocked with NO overheating issues. Good luck to you.
Mike.
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 27, 2005
#16
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #16
Thanks for all the help guys
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
250
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
Engine Distributor Interchange List
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
829
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
Wayne Waldrep
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
536
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?