• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Question about the fixed antenna

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimb05
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2004

jimb05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
9
1
0
Oct 20, 2004
#1
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #1
First, I have to say that I love the new mustang. I had an anemic 1980 vert in high school and then much later I had a 96 GT (wrecked when she was 8 days old) and a 97 GT. The last GT I drove only had 215 HP so I am certain I will apreciate the new stang. My last car was a 94 vette so I am wondering how the cars will compare.

Anyway, to my question/complaint. I cannot believe that Ford would completely redesign a car from the frame up for 2005 and still leave it with an ugly fixed antenna on the bumper. You don't expect to see fixed antennae on $30K cars. Is there an option for a window mounted antenna or is there a reliable aftermarket window mounted (hidden) antenna? Please let me know.
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Oct 20, 2004
#2
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #2
no
 
U

upstate

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
53
0
0
Oct 21, 2004
#3
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #3
That was part of the retro look. I like it and will finally have a radio that will work on am.
 

Power4

Member
May 10, 2004
200
0
16
Rochester, NY
Oct 21, 2004
#4
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #4
Who even notices the antenna? If it really bothers you, you can always remove it.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Oct 21, 2004
#5
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #5
Power4 said:
Who even notices the antenna? If it really bothers you, you can always remove it.
Click to expand...

Apparently a few people notice it. As this topic has been brought up before.
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Oct 21, 2004
#6
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #6
upstate said:
That was part of the retro look. I like it and will finally have a radio that will work on am.
Click to expand...

um, no

who think retro and big stalk attena?
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Oct 21, 2004
#7
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #7
I talked to a ford engineer about it. He said that they tried a window type antenna but the reception quality didn't meet their target for this particular model. There was also another reason that slips my mind.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Oct 21, 2004
#8
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #8
Mossberg said:
I talked to a ford engineer about it. He said that they tried a window type antenna but the reception quality didn't meet their target for this particular model. There was also another reason that slips my mind.
Click to expand...

A Ford engineer told me the same thing.

I asked him if the reason for the front fender whip antenna was because of the convertible. He said it was not, that they had tried a read window antenna & putting a whip on the rear fender but neither worked very well. He said AM reception is was MUCH better with the front fender whip. I laughed and told him, who cares, almost no-one listens to AM. To which he said that around Detroit EVERYONE listens to sports on AM radio so AM reception was very important.
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Oct 21, 2004
#9
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #9
works plenty fine in my moms buick
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#10
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #10
The rear window antena works great in my moms 2001 Grand Prix GT...

I have seen the new GT in person, and the antena is really bad, it even sits on a 1/4 inch riser.

This is a sad problem for a car with such great engineering behind it. Clear channel Communications killed radio, so who cares about reception. That mast doesn't even work with XM/Sirius.

The antena is a problem.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Oct 22, 2004
#11
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #11
351CJ said:
A Ford engineer told me the same thing.

I asked him if the reason for the front fender whip antenna was because of the convertible. He said it was not, that they had tried a read window antenna & putting a whip on the rear fender but neither worked very well. He said AM reception is was MUCH better with the front fender whip. I laughed and told him, who cares, almost no-one listens to AM. To which he said that around Detroit EVERYONE listens to sports on AM radio so AM reception was very important.
Click to expand...

It is important, and thats the truth, I listen to AM radio often to, and so do alot of stangers. Reception is just best with that antenna I guess
 

DaNd4Speed

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
180
0
0
Patterson, NY
Oct 22, 2004
#12
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #12
There's a reason why we prefer TV's without bunny ears any more, why can't Ford do it for the Mustang? Better AM reception, give me a break...you actually believe that load of crap?
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Oct 22, 2004
#13
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #13
DaNd4Speed said:
why can't Ford do it for the Mustang? Better AM reception, give me a break...you actually believe that load of crap?
Click to expand...

Most cars with hidden radio antennas have very poor AM reception.

AM brodcast is vertically polarized. A whip like the '05 Mustang has is vertically polarized. There is no question in my mind that a vertical whip is by far the best antenna for AM radio reception on a car. I am an engineer who has worked in the RF business for many years, I know this sort of stuff. If you want to I could get into a very in debth techincal discussion about various antennas, but the answer would still be the same.

With that said, the ONLY time I ever listen to AM radio is when I have to driver through or around NYC. Then I listen to the AM news stations that have traffic reports every 10 minutes. Other than that I NEVER listen to AM radio, so I would have preferred a crappy reception hidden antenna.

There is an easy solution, though. If you don't like the whip antenna, just remove it.
 

DaNd4Speed

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
180
0
0
Patterson, NY
Oct 22, 2004
#14
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #14
351CJ said:
Most cars with hidden radio antennas have very poor AM reception.

AM brodcast is vertically polarized. A whip like the '05 Mustang has is vertically polarized. There is no question in my mind that a vertical whip is by far the best antenna for AM radio reception on a car. I am an engineer who has worked in the RF business for many years, I know this sort of stuff. If you want to I could get into a very in debth techincal discussion about various antennas, but the answer would still be the same.

With that said, the ONLY time I ever listen to AM radio is when I have to driver through or around NYC. Then I listen to the AM news stations that have traffic reports every 10 minutes. Other than that I NEVER listen to AM radio, so I would have preferred a crappy reception hidden antenna.

There is an easy solution, though. If you don't like the whip antenna, just remove it.
Click to expand...


As a fellow engineer (Mechanical) I can see your point as to why a vertical whip type antenna is better for AM reception. However, I don't buy into the fact that they keep putting them on Mustangs for this reason. It all boils down to $$, the very same reason why Ford claims to have kept the solid axle in the back..for the seasoned drag racer (yeah sure).

Why not put them on Lincoln LS..or for most other cars for that matter? Why sell these people short if what they demand is AM radio reception?

I guess I could remove my antenna, but then again I have that awful looking base just sitting there next to the hood of my car. It just doesn't look clean at all. Why couldn't they place it on the roof, rake it back to be in line with the windshield (like my old '99 cougar), it actually looked pretty sharp and agressive.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Oct 22, 2004
#15
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #15
The flagpole antenna is cheap crap. Dont buy the "its better that way" rubbish. If it was then why dont better, higher quality cars all have flagpoles sticking out. In fact all cars would since its cheaper! No... its cheap Ford crap. Same thing on my stang, so I switched it for a 6" antenna. I'd much prefer one that was hidden though.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Oct 22, 2004
#16
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #16
DaNd4Speed said:
As a fellow engineer (Mechanical) I can see your point as to why a vertical whip type antenna is better for AM reception. However, I don't buy into the fact that they keep putting them on Mustangs for this reason. It all boils down to $$, the very same reason why Ford claims to have kept the solid axle in the back..for the seasoned drag racer (yeah sure).

Why not put them on Lincoln LS..or for most other cars for that matter? Why sell these people short if what they demand is AM radio reception?

I guess I could remove my antenna, but then again I have that awful looking base just sitting there next to the hood of my car. It just doesn't look clean at all. Why couldn't they place it on the roof, rake it back to be in line with the windshield (like my old '99 cougar), it actually looked pretty sharp and agressive.
Click to expand...

But I agree, that $$ had something to do with the decision. The LS was designed to sell at a much higher price point than the Mustang and a hidden antenna is a requirement in it's market segment. However, AM reception on my LS is pretty lame, but it's useable. Other LS owners have complained that their AM reception is horrible. I've had many cars with hidden radio antennas, all the way back to a 1977 Buick Century and a 1981 Olds Cutlass (antenna in the windshield). AM reception was not great in those cars either.

I don't think a roof antenna, like the New Edge Cougar has would work on the '05 Mustang, but I do think that putting the antenna on the rear fender would be a huge styling improvement.

I'll probably end up pulling of the whip antenna on my '05 or '06 Mustang as I'll be moving to Sirius by then anyway. Of course ugly satellite radio antennas is another subject.
 

jimb05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
9
1
0
Oct 22, 2004
#17
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #17
SO is there an aftermarket window antenna?

Does anyone know if we can replace the antenna with some sort of aftermarket window antenna? I'll give the 15 spanish sports and news stations that seem to dominate AM radio in exchange for a cleaner appearance.
 
B

BaronVonBigmeat

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
13
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#18
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #18
There's always some sort of hidden antenna you see advertised in the back of street rod magazines that just plugs in, although I'm not sure who makes it or how well it works.
 
A

A4B4Stang

New Member
Oct 23, 2004
2
0
0
Oct 24, 2004
#19
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #19
My concern as well...

While researching the new 05 Stang, the radio antenna literrally stood out. It was one of the cons when we were deciding on a Explorer Limited vs. Lincoln Aviator. We went with the Aviator...yes the reception is a bit worse but the clean look is worth it for me.

However, if the Stang stays with the long mast antenna, I can ignore the antenna since the car looks awesome. Plus, I'll just replace the antenna with something like:

http://www.mustangtuning.com/8fiblan.html

But regardless, the antenna won't deter me from a sliver GT with red interior!!
 
U

upstate

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
53
0
0
Oct 24, 2004
#20
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #20
I have owned in the last three years an 03 Towncar antenna in rear window glass, two 00 Lincoln LS's, 02 tbird front window glass, 05 300C in the glass and 01 Windstar rear window glass. They all stunk on AM. Who listens to it? Sports radio and talk radio is on AM. If it weren't for sat radio I would of been angrier about these glass antenna's. The windstar was the worst. I took it in under warrenty 3 times for radio reception, I couldn't even get the local 50,000 watt channel. The third dealership, after filters and radio changes did something so at least that one 50,000 watt station came in weak. The 02 bird lost AM radio when I installed a cell phone antenna on the glass - had to do it there because it is a convertiable. The 300C lost it when I had the rear window tinted. Seems the good tint has metalic particals in it. So this is why I am happy for the mast antenna. Sorry but this has just been my experience that lead me to my conclusion. If they can produce a glass mount that works as good I'm all for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
207
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
262
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
After a decade, I am no longer Stangless!
  • Jsmiley
  • May 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2024
manicmechanic007
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
cooling fan questions
  • stackz
  • Jun 5, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
910
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 6, 2024
stackz
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?