• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Question from my brother...track times

  • Thread starter Thread starter KENS89LX
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2007

KENS89LX

Member
Mar 12, 2006
302
1
19
Cross lanes Wv
Jun 24, 2007
#1
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #1
He went to the track today and his best time was a 14.5/95mph. Its a 89 gt with f cam eldebrock upper lower, 1.6 rollers, underpulleys, 70mm throttlebody/maf, 3.73 aluminum driveshaft. He is shifting at 5700rpms, should'nt he in the high 13's. I mentioned that it was probably the street tires, but he said it was hooking up good.. his 60ft was 2.1. Any suggestions of what he could do? On his last run he broke after shifting into 4th the clutch pedal went to the floor and would not come out of fourth any suggestions?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 25, 2007
#2
  • Jun 25, 2007
  • #2
I wouldnt say that 2.1 60' times are hooking good. I have seen plenty of people pulling 1.9x-2.0x on street tires. losing a tenth or two in the 60' will net you an extra 2 or 3 tenths at the 1/4. I think with good traction that combo should see high 13's. How many miles on the motor? stock short block i'm assuming? As for the clutch/tranny...check the cable, if not he probably broke something a little more serious. good luck
 

KENS89LX

Member
Mar 12, 2006
302
1
19
Cross lanes Wv
Jun 25, 2007
#3
  • Jun 25, 2007
  • #3
Its stock bottom end, and he checked the cable it was fine.. would the clutch fork breaking do this?
 
R

redfox91

Member
May 24, 2004
94
0
6
Northwest Arkansas
Jun 25, 2007
#4
  • Jun 25, 2007
  • #4
what was his reaction time? Maybe he could shift at 6000.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Jun 25, 2007
#5
  • Jun 25, 2007
  • #5
He should shift at alot lower RPM. I dont think your making too much power at that RPM with the stock heads.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 25, 2007
#6
  • Jun 25, 2007
  • #6
I think above 5500 rpm he isn't making very much power.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 26, 2007
#7
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #7
I was also thinking that 5700 was too high for stock heads. Im running gt-40's with a little work done to them and i still shift at 5500-5600. Maybe he should try shifting at 5000-5200.
 

Pod

Member
Aug 17, 2003
71
0
6
Cambridge, UK
Jun 26, 2007
#8
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #8
my89blubyu said:
He went to the track today and his best time was a 14.5/95mph. Its a 89 gt with f cam eldebrock upper lower, 1.6 rollers, underpulleys, 70mm throttlebody/maf, 3.73 aluminum driveshaft. He is shifting at 5700rpms, should'nt he in the high 13's. I mentioned that it was probably the street tires, but he said it was hooking up good.. his 60ft was 2.1. Any suggestions of what he could do?
Click to expand...

My best is a 14.21/98.8mph with the mods in my sig.
With a 95mph speed, I'd say around 14.5 is about right compared to other times I've seen.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Jun 26, 2007
#9
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #9
Check the quadrant and make sure that the teeth aren't stripped. Mine would go to the floor when the quadrant went bad. You can usually pull the pedal back up with your foot and limp it to where you need to go.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Jun 26, 2007
#10
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #10
redfox91 said:
what was his reaction time? Maybe he could shift at 6000.
Click to expand...

reaction time would have no effect on trap or ET

I was also thinking that 5700 was too high for stock heads. Im running gt-40's with a little work done to them and i still shift at 5500-5600. Maybe he should try shifting at 5000-5200.
Click to expand...

exactly. even with a MUCH better flowing Upper and lower your heads are killing you anywhere past 5000. I have a completely stock HCI, with a dying t-lok, horrid street tires (roadhugger 245s) and i still run 13.90s @ 99 w/ a 2.01 60 ft. I shift at 5200 and i drive it like i want to have a car to drive home. I think i can get 13.50s outa it on a drag radial or 13.80s on a better street tire. Its all in the launch and your shifts/shift points. practice makes perfect
 
R

redfox91

Member
May 24, 2004
94
0
6
Northwest Arkansas
Jun 27, 2007
#11
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #11
Tell me why reaction time would have nothing to do with it? 13.9 is fast for no more than you have done.
 
S

smallstang393

Member
Oct 18, 2004
75
0
6
Jun 27, 2007
#12
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #12
redfox91 said:
Tell me why reaction time would have nothing to do with it? 13.9 is fast for no more than you have done.
Click to expand...


Reaction time is just that reaction the clock doesn't start untill you start to move so you could have a 30 sec reaction and still run a 10 through a 1/4 reaction is just how long it takes you from time lights drop till car moves
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Jun 27, 2007
#13
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #13
^ exactly. reaction times only matter when you're bracket racing, you dont trip the lights till you start rolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
304
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
I
Fox Questions on my dyno results
  • ItsWay2fast4u
  • Sep 3, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 3, 2018
ItsWay2fast4u
I
Newbie
  • GalacticPonage
  • Jan 19, 2017
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
2K
The Welcome Wagon Jan 22, 2017
Davedacarpainter
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?