• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

question on thi H/C/I combo??

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1yola
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2006
A

a1yola

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
19
0
0
Mar 30, 2006
#1
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #1
well, I blew a headgasket and will be replacing them soon. I dont have money to buy "good" stuff, but since Im pulling the heads off already, I figured why not change them with something a little better than stock.
here is the HCI combo that I was thinking of:
stock block with e-cam, dart windsor Jr. heads, and GT-40 intake

I chose these heads because I can get them from a friend for $450. Does that sound good, or shoudl i look for something else?

Thanks!
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Mar 30, 2006
#2
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #2
Sounds fine to me. Are the Windsor heads used? If so, I'd pay to get them cleaned up and looked at.
 
A

a1yola

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
19
0
0
Mar 30, 2006
#3
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #3
yes the heads are used. So di you know if i'll have problems with the clearance or anything with those heads and the E-cam?
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Mar 30, 2006
#4
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #4
What size valves are they? If they have 2.02 intake valves they won't work with stock pistons
 
8

87pony

Member
Oct 14, 2004
69
0
6
Mar 30, 2006
#5
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #5
they would if they were trickflows
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Mar 30, 2006
#6
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #6
I beleive the windsor Jr came with 1.94's and were designed as a bolt on for the 302. As long they arent modified you should have no problems with them. But of course, you ALWAYS check valve clearance before you start it.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Mar 30, 2006
#7
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #7
Dont buy them if they're iron. Get a cartridge roll kit and polish up the ports before you put whatever heads you buy on the car. And of course dont forget to gasket match the intake.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Mar 30, 2006
#8
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #8
87pony said:
they would if they were trickflows
Click to expand...

TW's are the ****znit
 
J

jjd975

Founding Member
Jul 17, 2000
4,236
0
0
louisville,kentucky
Mar 31, 2006
#9
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #9
Personally I would use the TFS 1 over the E cam and I would get a different intake. The GT-40 is (IMO) a high dollar turd.

On those heads you could use a cobra, explorer or performer and get equal or better results for less cash.
 
R

Redrooster

New Member
Jul 13, 2005
73
0
0
Apr 1, 2006
#10
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #10
You can run those heads even if they do have 2.02 valves with an e-303 cam. I don't know why every says you can't. There is enough p/v clearance for an e-cam. Just not much more. I've got a friend who ran a set of canfields of a stock short block with an elgin cam 222@ .050 w/ .510 lift for years.
 
S

snoboardcore

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
276
0
0
New Hampshire
Apr 1, 2006
#11
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #11
jjd975 said:
Personally I would use the TFS 1 over the E cam and I would get a different intake. The GT-40 is (IMO) a high dollar turd.

On those heads you could use a cobra, explorer or performer and get equal or better results for less cash.
Click to expand...

theres nothing wrong with the gt-40. I have it on my car unported with a supercharger and i threw down 475 at the wheels.
 
J

jjd975

Founding Member
Jul 17, 2000
4,236
0
0
louisville,kentucky
Apr 1, 2006
#12
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #12
snoboardcore said:
theres nothing wrong with the gt-40. I have it on my car unported with a supercharger and i threw down 475 at the wheels.
Click to expand...

You have it so of course you will like it. Truth is the GT-40 cost 600.00 and is far from being worth it.

Tons of better intakes on the market for less.

Look under the hood of any car at NMRA/FFW and you will not see the GT40.
 
S

snoboardcore

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
276
0
0
New Hampshire
Apr 1, 2006
#13
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #13
jjd975 said:
You have it so of course you will like it. Truth is the GT-40 cost 600.00 and is far from being worth it.

Tons of better intakes on the market for less.

Look under the hood of any car at NMRA/FFW and you will not see the GT40.
Click to expand...
im not saying theres not better intakes out there im just saying for what hes probally doing it is good enough. Yea sure if i switch to a Holley intake i could gain 15hp but im not going to. The gt-40 intake will flow something like 200cfm which is plenty with what he would be doing. Also if i can throw down 475 with it im sure it is plenty for his combo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
686
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
763
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?