• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Question to those that know...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bullitt4711
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2004
B

Bullitt4711

New Member
Sep 25, 2003
15
0
0
Poway, CA
Jan 2, 2004
#1
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #1
Ok here is my question:

Given that two cars have accurate dynos from the same location and both are correct, will the car with the higher peak horsepower or the car with the higher average horsepower go faster down the strip. How would each affect ET numbers as well as trap speed of the two cars. What is generally more desirable and why?

~Colby
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Jan 2, 2004
#2
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #2
If they have equal peak HP, the one with the flatter torque/HP curve (higher average). If you peak at 400 HP but only have an average of 200, a car with a peak of 350 but average of 300 will be faster.
 

killbee

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2000
96
0
7
Western NC
Jan 2, 2004
#3
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #3
JonJon said:
If they have equal peak HP, the one with the flatter torque/HP curve (higher average). If you peak at 400 HP but only have an average of 200, a car with a peak of 350 but average of 300 will be faster.
Click to expand...

Thats true but it also depends on the driver, lower hp cars can get there quicker with a good driver. Also remember peak #'s are not everything because its almost impossible to keep your car at that peak # for the entire time during a run. Just my .02.
 
B

Bullitt4711

New Member
Sep 25, 2003
15
0
0
Poway, CA
Jan 2, 2004
#4
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #4
Thanks for the response. Varifies what I thought.

~Colby
 

GT2000JAY

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,344
0
0
Northwest
Jan 2, 2004
#5
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #5
Also take into consideration that the power from launch RPM to around 4750-5250 is only used in first gear. So, you're really primarily talking about average horsepower/torque under the curve from the point where the RPM's land after a shift for 2-4 gears.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 9:46 PM
X-cam34
X
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
254
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
571
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?