• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Questioning the worth of long tubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter smokin'Red35th
  • Start date Start date Jun 25, 2004

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 25, 2004
#1
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #1
Ok, is bolting on long tubes worth the trouble and the money when paired with a hi-flo H-Pipe? i know it can be a PITA to install and they can be expensive. Also, is there a clearance problem for anyone who lowers their car 1.5" up front?
This question stems from people telling me that 98 and older model's exhaust manifolds suck, but 99+ are much improved and make switching out headers almost pointless. Is there any truth to this statement? I see an awful lot of stangers with long tubes so there has to be a reason for this. just trying to clear this up.

Also, is there any advantage to changing the exhaust from behind the mufflers? I have flow 40s and will be doing h-pipe and possibly headers, but can i leave the cat-back portion the same and not loose any hp? If not, why are aftermarket cat-backs so much better? isnt it just a bent tube?

Thanks for your help!
 
J

Jake795

New Member
May 19, 2004
110
0
0
Jun 25, 2004
#2
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #2
the aftermarket cat back systems are 2.5" tubing instead of the stock 2.25"

I would also like to know of any problems with long tubes on lowered stangs
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 25, 2004
#3
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #3
My intakes mods cost $620. With these, u/d pullies ($150) and a Diablo Predator ($400), I gained 24 rwhp. The total cost was $1170, which amounts to $49 per horse. I then added Hooker headers ($700) and an o/r x-pipe ($135), and gained an additional 23 rwhp. The total cost was $835, which amounts to $36 per horse. Because of the difficulty of installation, however, I had to pay for labor. This makes the cost per horse much more expensive.
 

damacman

Member
Aug 12, 2003
529
0
16
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 25, 2004
#4
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #4
The only people that will tell you that L/Ts aren't worth the effort are the ones that don't have them. Do a search on this forum for dyno charts, you'll see what I'm talking about. The install isn't that bad, you just need a weekend, lots of patience, and a wide selection of ratchets, sockets, extensions, universals, and wrenches. Oh yeah, and lots of gojo because you'll get filthy . . .
 

damacman

Member
Aug 12, 2003
529
0
16
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 25, 2004
#5
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #5
btw, the bassani exhaust on my car has more ground clearance than did the stock set up.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jun 25, 2004
#6
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #6
ground clearance is not a problem at all with my car & it's dropped 1 1/2 in. as far as power, yes it's worth it. i gained 18 rwhp on a mustang dyno with mine & it would have been well over 20 rwhp on a dynojet
 

Aaron 4.6

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
2,695
0
0
Georgia
Jun 25, 2004
#7
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #7
I'm picking up my car tomorrow from a LT header install. The headers, X-pipe, and tune were worth about 30 rwhp.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jun 25, 2004
#8
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #8
Aaron 4.6 said:
I'm picking up my car tomorrow from a LT header install. The headers, X-pipe, and tune were worth about 30 rwhp.
Click to expand...


very nice


i need a tune
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
For Sale 2003 mustang GT
  • jimted79
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
580
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 22, 2025
jimted79
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Turbo or Chambered mufflers?
  • limp
  • Feb 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2024
limp
M
Engine Intermittent CEL with loss of power
  • Mikebro
  • Sep 7, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 13, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?