• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Questions about CAI

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedStallion43
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

RedStallion43

Member
Sep 10, 2004
61
0
6
Chi-Town
Aug 14, 2005
#1
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #1
Hi, im thinking of getting a CAI considering almost everyone seems to have one. Are there any real gains over a CAI vs. a stock Airbox with a K&N filter and air silencer removed? Also has anyone who switched over to a CAI notice a little difference in there exhaust note? Im considering a fenderwell CAI wich I beleive Mac makes. Any input here would be great.
 

TripleBlack95

Member
Dec 14, 2003
153
1
16
Burke (Fairfax), VA
Aug 14, 2005
#2
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #2
Yeah, I got one. It looks great, I don't think it really makes that much of a difference - but hell yeah get it for looks. It frees up a little space too.
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Aug 14, 2005
#3
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #3
You won't notice a difference but you can hear the sound of air rushing in when you accelerate. They are all the same too so either build your own or get the cheap E-Bay one. I got mine from ProCarParts and it was actually pretty nice.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Aug 14, 2005
#4
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #4
I never had the stock inlet, but the car has a Mac CAI and it looks alright. From pics I have seen, it is smaller than the stock airbox set up, which is nice.

I am not a fan of CAI's though and would have preferred a stock air box. Just weird me.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Aug 14, 2005
#5
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #5
homeade ones are the best
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Aug 14, 2005
#6
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #6
Better Looks = the only gain IMO. You can hear the air rushing in with a CAI .... but I don't really care for that like some people do.

I got a cheap one off of eBay. Well worth the price. It is the EXACT same thing as the MAC CAI. Just cheaper price.

And my exhaust note didn't change at all.
 
8

88GT460

New Member
Sep 23, 2004
338
0
0
Arkansas
Aug 14, 2005
#7
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #7
the idea behind cold air intakes are that the tubes are aluminum or metal instead of the plastic junk. So the metal/aluminum does not get as hot like the plastic does thus making it cooler air, and cooler air is better obviously.

also fender well kits get air from the outside, which is definately cooler than the air inside the engine bay.
 

RedStallion43

Member
Sep 10, 2004
61
0
6
Chi-Town
Aug 14, 2005
#8
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #8
Thanks guys for all your help. I think im just gonna get a cheapo on ebay, not worth paying 150+ dollars for something that doesnt give u any real gain. Wich ebay CAI are reccomended? Do they have any fenderwell mounted CAI's on ebay? For anybdy who installed a ebay CAI are they a straight swap with our sensors or do things have to be cut and re-wired like i heard about somewhere before? thanks again
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Aug 14, 2005
#9
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #9
RedStallion43 said:
Are there any real gains over a CAI vs. a stock Airbox with a K&N filter and air silencer removed? Also has anyone who switched over to a CAI notice a little difference in there exhaust note?
Click to expand...

Probably not, but it made things feel smoother overall. Exhaust note also smoothed out.

I've had the Mac one on my car for about four years now and it's been fine. Kind of a pain to put back on if you take it off for anything. I'm thinking about getting an 80mm MAF and making my own intake, soon. Had I been more inclined, at the time, I probably would have done that in the first place.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Aug 14, 2005
#10
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #10
88GT460 said:
the idea behind cold air intakes are that the tubes are aluminum or metal instead of the plastic junk. So the metal/aluminum does not get as hot like the plastic does thus making it cooler air, and cooler air is better obviously.

also fender well kits get air from the outside, which is definately cooler than the air inside the engine bay.
Click to expand...
I don't think the first part of what you said is right. High school chemistry taught me that metal conducts heat better than plastic. So the stock plastic piece would actually be a better insulator.

But I think the second thing you said is really what cold air intakes are supposed to do. They pull in cold air from outside of the engine compartment for combustion.

Of course, the stock box is a cold air intake, as it pulls air from the fenderwell. That's why everyone says there is no real performance gain from an aftermarket CAI.

I think the other theoretical gain from an aftermarket CAI is that it has a smooth wall, not all those ridges as the stock unit has. But then there's the point that a certain amount of turbulance in the intake air flow is beneficial. This is the point at which I lose all interest in the subject.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Aug 15, 2005
#11
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #11
RedStallion43 said:
Wich ebay CAI are reccomended? Do they have any fenderwell mounted CAI's on ebay? For anybdy who installed a ebay CAI are they a straight swap with our sensors or do things have to be cut and re-wired like i heard about somewhere before? thanks again
Click to expand...


I bought mine from a guy that goes by "mqtautoparts" on eBAy. He ships really fast and has a good feedback. And yes it is a fenderwell mounted CAI. It is a straight swap. You just have to remove your MAF sensor from it's housing. I did however have a tough time mounting it. I had to go to the hardware store & get (2) 4" hose clamps (both for under $1) ..... as 2 of the clamps he sent me were just a hair too small. You may get the same problem ... you may not. I emailed him back and told him about the problem, so he may have fixed that. He offered to send me what I needed, but I told him not to worry about it. No biggie. It sure beats paying $130 - $200 for the like.


FYI.... some people say you have to mount the filter from under the car (behind the plastic area). I DID NOT. I did everything from the top. The surrounding area had everything stock, too. If you just work with it a little, you can get it in there from the top. The other way seems WAY to complicated for this. Work smart, not hard.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Aug 15, 2005
#12
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #12
GRGT1994 said:
I don't think the first part of what you said is right. High school chemistry taught me that metal conducts heat better than plastic. So the stock plastic piece would actually be a better insulator.
Click to expand...

You're right about heat conduction, but if you remember more of your chemistry class, you'll remember that there is also something called specific heat. Plastic (once hot) will hold the heat longer than metal. This is part why heatsinks are aluminum, not plastic.

I bought mine from X3Racing on Ebay, about $50 shipped. I'm pretty happy with it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/94-9...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ7992887943
 

RedStallion43

Member
Sep 10, 2004
61
0
6
Chi-Town
Aug 15, 2005
#13
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #13
illwood said:
I bought mine from X3Racing on Ebay, about $50 shipped. I'm pretty happy with it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/94-9...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ7992887943
Click to expand...

Does that one hook into the fenderwell? I also heard problems of going through puddles and the intake sucking it up from the fenderwell. Anyone find truth to this?
 

deadlast

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
495
0
0
Belmont, MA
Aug 15, 2005
#14
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #14
RedStallion43 said:
Does that one hook into the fenderwell? I also heard problems of going through puddles and the intake sucking it up from the fenderwell. Anyone find truth to this?
Click to expand...

unless you have a ram air tube up to the filter, or you removed the plastic splash guard in the tire well, you shouldnt have a problem with water
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Aug 15, 2005
#15
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #15
illwood said:
You're right about heat conduction, but if you remember more of your chemistry class, you'll remember that there is also something called specific heat. Plastic (once hot) will hold the heat longer than metal. This is part why heatsinks are aluminum, not plastic.

I bought mine from X3Racing on Ebay, about $50 shipped. I'm pretty happy with it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/94-9...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ7992887943
Click to expand...
This I'm not so sure about??? If you bring plastic up to melting point (hottest point for plastic) and bring metal up to the same temp, the metal deffinately cools much slower, plastic gets cool and solidifies cool to the touch within minutes. This is also the reason there making composite intake tracts (less heat transfere and lighter, as well as cost i'm sure) You can put your hand on one after a drag run, try that with an aluminum one. I'm deffinately not an expert on the subject, just hands on experience.

Now aluminum holds heat much more than steel.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Aug 15, 2005
#16
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #16
An interesting debate. I'm not a Materials Engineer either (mechanical, yes, materials, no). I would imagine that weight and cost are the two most important benefits that are the reasons for composite intakes these days.

In which case, are you negating the "cold air" aspect by the amount the air heats as it rushes through the tube? How does the boundary layer figure into this for fluid flow? Would the boundary layer be taking most of the heat and how much would it be introducing to the engine? Any guys good at CFD that wanna help?
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Aug 15, 2005
#17
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #17
illwood said:
An interesting debate. I'm not a Materials Engineer either (mechanical, yes, materials, no). I would imagine that weight and cost are the two most important benefits that are the reasons for composite intakes these days.

In which case, are you negating the "cold air" aspect by the amount the air heats as it rushes through the tube? How does the boundary layer figure into this for fluid flow? Would the boundary layer be taking most of the heat and how much would it be introducing to the engine? Any guys good at CFD that wanna help?
Click to expand...

That was another question I had, composite intake = less heat soak which should equate to cooler air right? So a cai should only make things cooler?? I would be extremely interested in some type of composite intake for our cars, for experimental purposes of course. I would think it would be really expensive to design and make.
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 16, 2005
#18
  • Aug 16, 2005
  • #18
When I put a MAC CAI on several years ago my car felt stronger and accelerated easier. Logic would also tell me that removing all of the 90* bends and the kinked stock air hose and the screen in front of the MAF in the stock air box would all help in the production of power.
Tim
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Aug 17, 2005
#19
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #19
illwood said:
You're right about heat conduction, but if you remember more of your chemistry class, you'll remember that there is also something called specific heat. Plastic (once hot) will hold the heat longer than metal. This is part why heatsinks are aluminum, not plastic.
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Ya, I think the comment about aluminum heatsinks reinforces what I said. If an aluminum heat sink relieves its heat faster to the outside (cooler) air faster than a plastic heat sink would, then surely a metal CAI would relieve more of its heat to the cool incoming air charge than a plastic one would. So the end result would be, ceteras paribus, hotter air into the engine with a metal intake than a plastic one.

I think my point was simply that the reason for a CAI is not to prevent the intake tube from getting hot (let's face it, whether it's plastic or metal, eventually it will absorb the same amount of heat), but rather the point is to pull intake air from outside of the engine compartment, which is surely cooler than the air under the hood.

But Mustangs come with a CAI to start with, so aftermarket CAI's are purely for looks (and maybe for a smoother intake track).
 

rgs

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
124
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Aug 17, 2005
#20
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #20
specific heat is the amount of heat needed to raise a 1kg of a certain material 1 degree celsius
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
A
Carb swap question
  • AA wALtZ
  • Jul 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2024
General karthief
T
Newbie here with an odd story
  • thequadfather
  • Jul 20, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
608
The Welcome Wagon Jul 22, 2024
thequadfather
T
W
Blue smoke..
  • Wicked_Rpm
  • Aug 11, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
474
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2024
weendoggy
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?