• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Race Engine build quote........YIKES!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bullitt347
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 26, 2013
#21
  • Jan 26, 2013
  • #21
Rick 91GT said:
Sounds like an awesome build... What lower intake will that be using with the KB?
Click to expand...


I am using the Trick Flow R lower intake. Sitting on top of that will be a Reichard Racing box upper that will house the air to water inter-cooler. Obviously some custom intake and outlet manifolding to make it all work.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 26, 2013
#22
  • Jan 26, 2013
  • #22
S&B said:
after building my first big engine about 1k miles in the front (snout) of the crank shaft literally snapped off and fugged everything up that wasn't major but was about a 4K hit. Im over that stage, im happy with stock or semi stock stuff that doesn't break ... as often
Click to expand...

Do you know how many 1/4 mile passes you have to have to make it to 1K miles? At that point I will have possibly moved on to bigger and better things Lol.........
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jan 31, 2013
#23
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #23
Sounds like you are going down the same road I just went down. Are you looking for 1200 to the tire or the crank? There is a big difference
Good luck with the kenne bell at those power levels. As for the hood clearance, I could fit a stock hood with my windsor and v24 x they just don't make a stock flat fiberglass hood for an 85 so I had to go with a 2.5" cowl
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 31, 2013
#24
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #24
84Ttop said:
Sounds like you are going down the same road I just went down. Are you looking for 1200 to the tire or the crank? There is a big difference
Good luck with the kenne bell at those power levels. As for the hood clearance, I could fit a stock hood with my windsor and v24 x they just don't make a stock flat fiberglass hood for an 85 so I had to go with a 2.5" cowl
Click to expand...
i thought schoneck made a flat glass hood for them
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 31, 2013
#25
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #25
http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0...no-method-sbf-roots-foxbody.html#post11276382

Ever thought about doing something like this, but instead of a TVS or eaton, put a monster KB or whipple on it? Be cool to see a 3.8 or 4.0L on a pushrod motor.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 31, 2013
#26
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #26
90lxcoupe said:
http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0...no-method-sbf-roots-foxbody.html#post11276382

Ever thought about doing something like this, but instead of a TVS or eaton, put a monster KB or whipple on it? Be cool to see a 3.8 or 4.0L on a pushrod motor.
Click to expand...

I doubt that the above project could have an air to water intercooler that could support the HP that I am after. Also he is using a stock dampener with the 36 tooth trigger wheel already attached. This would be another problem for me as that dampener would not take the RPM and HP load plus it is only a 6 rib dampener and I need at least an 8 rib belt to drive the supercharger. Not that that guy does not have an awesome project, it is just more street oriented. I am going to be spinning just north of 8,000 rpm and pushing 26-27 psi before intercooler. At that kind of load and RPM, a stock 6 rib dampener would come apart. I suppose someone could make a one off zero balance 8 rib SFI dampener, but even then, the pulley spacing would not work with what I have. Anytime you center the supercharger in the center of the engine on a pushrod based 5.0 you run into intercooler core size vs cooling effectiveness, unless you mount the blower up a lot higher. Otherwise you need a relatively small intercooler core, and that limits how much boost you can push through it and that also limits how much of a air charge temp drop you can get.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 31, 2013
#27
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #27
your going to have a hell of a time with a 8 rib set up.

we killed belts in about 2-3 passes at 25lbs on a 2.2 making 660rwhp through a C4 on a mustang dyno.
id suggest a 12 rib set up or a cog set up
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 31, 2013
#28
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #28
Bullitt347 said:
I doubt that the above project could have an air to water intercooler that could support the HP that I am after. Also he is using a stock dampener with the 36 tooth trigger wheel already attached. This would be another problem for me as that dampener would not take the RPM and HP load plus it is only a 6 rib dampener and I need at least an 8 rib belt to drive the supercharger. Not that that guy does not have an awesome project, it is just more street oriented. I am going to be spinning just north of 8,000 rpm and pushing 26-27 psi before intercooler. At that kind of load and RPM, a stock 6 rib dampener would come apart. I suppose someone could make a one off zero balance 8 rib SFI dampener, but even then, the pulley spacing would not work with what I have. Anytime you center the supercharger in the center of the engine on a pushrod based 5.0 you run into intercooler core size vs cooling effectiveness, unless you mount the blower up a lot higher. Otherwise you need a relatively small intercooler core, and that limits how much boost you can push through it and that also limits how much of a air charge temp drop you can get.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of things with that setup that could be changed. ATI makes balancers with crank trigger magnets right in them, you dont have to use that style trigger wheel, and im sure at the level you are doing this build, you wouldnt mind doing some custom work. I think doing a coil on plug setup would be much better than a distributor anyways. Much more accurate, and powerful spark. I think if anything is going to be a limiting factor on your setup, its going to be the small kenne bell. I just figured i would throw it out there.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 31, 2013
#29
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #29
90lxcoupe said:
I think if anything is going to be a limiting factor on your setup, its going to be the small kenne bell.
Click to expand...

That "small" Kenne Bell is capable of supporting over 1200 HP. So I don't think of it as small, but very efficient. ATI does have a dampener for a crank trigger, but they only can provide up to 16 magnets in the dampener at this time, I would like to have at least 32. I want to do a coil on plug set up. In fact I have a Fast XFI that I want to use, and am still waiting for a reply to my e-mail about how to make the Fast XFI work with the Explorer cam sensor but have not heard back from them for about a week now. Might have to shoot them another e-mail. At this time, the Fast crank trigger uses just a 4 tooth pick-up wheel with the magnet in the sensor. This works fine until about 6,200 rpm, at that point you have to have a "flying magnet" trigger wheel with the magnets in the trigger wheel and not the sensor.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,065
21,246
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 31, 2013
#30
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #30
srtthis said:
your going to have a hell of a time with a 8 rib set up.

we killed belts in about 2-3 passes at 25lbs on a 2.2 making 660rwhp through a C4 on a mustang dyno.
id suggest a 12 rib set up or a cog set up
Click to expand...

Not sure what blower that was with but it was likely not a KB. KB = No Cog... ever. Not to say that there haven't been a few but the majority of those end with broken bits spit out of the casing.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 31, 2013
#31
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #31
We did that with a 2.2kb...
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 31, 2013
#32
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #32
the only issue so far with the 2.8L liquid cooled set up was not the belts...........but the snout. The stock snout was never made for that much load. We were breaking off the blower pulley bolt. The max size bolt for the pulley was 10mm and it could not take the load. Also the aluminum pulleys would last only 5-6 passes. We went with a steel pulley and the damn pulley bolt would break on the 1-2 shift every time. So we took off the snout, and had it modified to accept a bigger diameter shaft so we could run a 12mm pulley bolt, plus the bearings in the snout were also upgraded, and then going to a Billetflow pulley that was steel at the hub, with an aluminum outer shell fixed the problem.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 31, 2013
#33
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #33
i just want to add that your idea of running the coil on plug set up is sounding better and better. we have to run a very odd cap set up on the race car because of where the 3rd system is and we may not be able to pull enough timing on that cap and keep the rotor phased correctly and still have enough base timing to get the car up on the brake...
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,966
2,925
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 31, 2013
#34
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #34
The nice thing about the Fast XFI is if you go COP, then it allows you to vary ignition timing changes from one cylinder to the next, so if you have one cylinder showing a pre-ignition issue, you do not have to kill timing across all of the cylinders, just the one that has the issue. It also allows for individual fuel injector timing as well. It just opens up a whole addition range of tuning.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 31, 2013
#35
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #35
we can do the cylinder to cylinder stuff in the power grid also... we've always had to do that. number 8 always was zero and read cool so we had to throw a bigger jet in that one just to get it to keep up
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
G
  • Locked
2006 Ford Mustang GT D.S.S. 5.0L Stroker Crate Engine Street Legal Race Car
  • GunshipDriver
  • Sep 4, 2011
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
5
Views
7K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Oct 26, 2011
ranger2339
R
  • Locked
91mm Turbo Mustang Project Car
  • cv334
  • Jul 3, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 4, 2011
OneQuick01
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?