• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

? re: wobbling balancers???

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaymac
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2006

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 4, 2006
#1
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #1
I just some confirmation or denial that this story is
A guy I know is selling his whole "drag truck" setup (13 second build)
according to him, you'd need to get a fuildamper, as aparently, "the new rebuilt internals and reciprocating assembly is SO light that it keeps causing the stock balancer to tear the front seal and then the balancer ends up wobbling around. To me, it sounds like AT LEAST the crank, if not the ENTIRE reciprocating assembly, would at hat point be screwed and/or permanantly damaged, or there is a MUCH bigger problem here. I didn't want to call to his face, but I'm pretty sure it is.
It would seem it's only logic, no?
Correct me if I'm wrong here, guys!
Thanks!
J
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Apr 4, 2006
#2
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #2
Fluid damper ain't fixing that. It's probably too loose from too much machining.
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 4, 2006
#3
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #3
so...fugged, right?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Apr 4, 2006
#4
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #4
That's what i would think, but i'm no expert on that.
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 4, 2006
#5
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #5
yeah, me neither. Figured I'd ask and learn!
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 5, 2006
#6
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #6
ttt
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Apr 5, 2006
#7
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #7
Jay, i have seen it where the balancer or crank needed machining for the balancer to fit right. Subsequently the engine got torn up, and they ended up getting a new crank.
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 5, 2006
#8
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #8
so either way, it would not be a case of getting "just" a new balancer...
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Apr 5, 2006
#9
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #9
From the way you made it sound in the opening post this has happened a couple of times. To tear apart a balancer it either needs to be the wrong balance, or just old.
So the first one i can understand, the second suggests there is a real problem.
But as i said, it may take a real expect to physcially inspect it.
It this an engine you are considering buying? If so, i wouldn't dare.
 

RADIALKILLER

New Member
Nov 20, 2005
141
0
0
Arkansas
Apr 5, 2006
#10
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #10
stock balancers will come apart after a while of high rpm abuse. (my experience with more than one of them )
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 5, 2006
#11
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #11
it's an engine that is for sale, but I;ve always been weary of the idea due to the shady balancer situation. Plus, he's trying to unoad it dirt cheap...
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Apr 5, 2006
#12
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #12
Last time I checked, the seal doesnt stabilize the crank. You could remove the front crank seal and the crank would maintain the exact same relative rotational pathway (and the balancer would spin true as the crank continues to spin true).

Maybe I misunderstood.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 5, 2006
#13
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #13


I don't think I understand. Is the rubber isolator being destroyed or is the damper actually rotating in relation to the crank? Either way I think he didn't properly balance the rotating assy, before he started hitting the high revs. That is the only thing I can think of that would cause such an issue. The stuff about being "so light weight" is either ignorance or bs. Then again I have been known to be wrong on more than one ocassion.

jason
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Apr 6, 2006
#14
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #14
No, Jason, I think both you, hissin, and everybody else in this thread have been right. I think the kid is either stupid, lying or both, and is hoping I'll take the problem off his hands like an idiot.
To be honest, I don't know what the hell it's actually "doing", as the kid kind of talks in circles and doesn't sound like he knows what he's talking about either....
douche.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
I
Hello And Looking For Manual Transmission Options For 2001 Mustang Gt
  • Infinite Monkeys
  • Oct 18, 2015
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 21, 2015
Infinite Monkeys
I
Fox T5 To Aod Conversion
  • 86GTVert#2
  • Jun 29, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2016
86GTVert#2
H
New Mustang Guy, And A New Project!
  • Heresy
  • Oct 19, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 9, 2016
Heresy
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?