Read my signature for possible HP #'s

O

onefastgt

New Member

Jun 26, 2002

44

0

0

Pittsburgh, PA

Sep 8, 2006

#1

• Sep 8, 2006

• #1

I'm curious what the possibility is, since I've never had it dynoed of the car's HP.
It probably doesn't affect your opinion but I have clearly beaten a twin-turbo dodge stealth, a camaro ss, & also a firebird ws6 and finally a STi.

Alot of you guys have tried and trued many aftermarket parts with dyno #'s to back up your opinions.... Thanks fellow Stangers!!

Jeff: SNSign:

 

nwapache

New Member

Jun 27, 2006

313

0

0

Seattle,WA

Sep 8, 2006

#2

• Sep 8, 2006

• #2

prolly 275 at the wheels give or take a couple....and you must be a helluva driver to have beaten all those cars....

 

Dope 97GT

New Member

Jul 16, 2005

439

0

0

Rochester, NY (SUNY Brockport)

Sep 8, 2006

#3

• Sep 8, 2006

• #3

without heads or cams i say like 245-255 somewhere in there from your sig it looks pretty much stock except for intake pieces.

 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer

Founding Member

Dec 28, 2002

465

0

16

Lexington, SC

Sep 8, 2006

#4

• Sep 8, 2006

• #4

I hit 249 with off road prochamber, accufab tb/plenum, xcal2 by MPH, and magnaflow mufflers. Id expect yours to be VERY similar. 275 rwhp is longtube numbers.

 

nwapache

New Member

Jun 27, 2006

313

0

0

Seattle,WA

Sep 8, 2006

#5

• Sep 8, 2006

• #5

oops, I misread...I thought he had LT's

 

the98stang

Active Member

Aug 12, 2005

2,408

0

47

Clovis, CA

Sep 8, 2006

#6

• Sep 8, 2006

• #6

I'd say 260WHP

 

BooWFO

New Member

May 10, 2005

991

0

0

Louisville, KY

Sep 8, 2006

#7

• Sep 8, 2006

• #7

240-260rwhp.

 

four six

Member

Jan 19, 2006

506

2

18

Hobart, IN

Sep 8, 2006

#8

• Sep 8, 2006

• #8

I know you want someone to say 300 rwhp but I say 269.767 rwhp

 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member

Jan 18, 2004

1,841

7

38

New Jersey

Sep 8, 2006

#9

• Sep 8, 2006

• #9

I'd say 245rwhp. MAYBE 250rwhp. Honestly doesn't have much done. And I agree with what someone else said, you must have been a hell of a driver to have beaten those cars. So nice job (you dont even have gears or drag radials)

 

Crzyhrse

Active Member

Dec 23, 2004

0

2

38

Seattle, WA

Sep 8, 2006

#10

• Sep 8, 2006

• #10

250-255. Did you see handicapped license plates on those cars? If not, they need them, or they need their license revoked. Nice job anyway.

 

O

onefastgt

New Member

Jun 26, 2002

44

0

0

Pittsburgh, PA

Sep 8, 2006

#11

• Sep 8, 2006

• #11

thanks for the advice..

yeah, i thought my HP would be higher yet i am not very surprised...single biggest N/A add-on for the most HP/TQ? Last ?......THANKS FOR ALL THE REPLIES....

 

Crzyhrse

Active Member

Dec 23, 2004

0

2

38

Seattle, WA

Sep 8, 2006

#12

• Sep 8, 2006

• #12

I don't know how big of a gain the 2V's get with the handheld tuners, but I got 13RWHP @ 12RWTQ gain with my Predator and all I have for mods is a Catback, X-pipe, C@L Tru-Flo system. The Predator was by far my best power gain. I'd get the SCT Excal if I was looking for a tuner now.

 

jivepepper

Founding Member

Jun 19, 2002

776

5

18

Under a Sombrero. in WV.

Sep 8, 2006

#13

• Sep 8, 2006

• #13

245

 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member

Founding Member

Aug 18, 2001

1,115

1

0

Paducah, KY

Sep 8, 2006

#14

• Sep 8, 2006

• #14

255rwhp

i had 270rwhp with a steeda cai, accufab 75mm tb and plenum, slp lts, slp o/r xpipe, steeda catback, and a dyno tune.

im at 296rwhp now since i've done u/d pulleys and cams. I would say the cams impressed me the most because it changed the powerband so much. I gained almost 50rwhp at 6k rpms. Before that my other 2 big favorites were the 4.10 gears and the LTs

 

sgarlic

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2001

3,085

1

56

Sep 9, 2006

#15

• Sep 9, 2006

• #15

250ish

 

ADRENLN

Active Member

Apr 16, 2003

2,342

3

49

NJ

Sep 10, 2006

#16

• Sep 10, 2006

• #16

yea i got dynoed with about those mods the first dyno. i had 241rwhp. i think you got around 245rwhp. yea i dont get how you spanked those cars.