• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

rear main seal question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerry S
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2006

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 13, 2006
#1
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #1
My understanding is that 351W blocks had 2 piece rear main seals until 1984 and that beginning in 1985, the blocks switched to the 1 piece rear main seal. Is this correct?
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 14, 2006
#2
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #2
Bueller? Bueller? Any one? Any one? If I order an oil pan gasket for a 69 351W block, I want the 2 piece rear main seal, correct?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Feb 14, 2006
#3
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #3
the oil pan doesn't care what kind of rear main seal you're running.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Feb 14, 2006
#4
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #4
If you want a leak free one, order the Felpro one piece gasket made for the early mustangs. It's around $50 but well worth it IMO. It is a rubber composite with a steel core and leak free performance. Reusable too and no RTV required!

Also, the type or rear main doesn't affect the pan gasket. BUT, the year of pan does. The early pans had ribbing in the pan flange to prevent the cork from squeezing out. The later 5.0/5.8 engines had flat flanges, thus the gaskets are different. Felpro makes a specific gasket for the early pans (early i mean pre 5.0) and is available at autozone. I know you aren't running a 5.0 pan (cause it is rear sump) but they may try to give you a 5.8 pan gasket.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 14, 2006
#5
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #5
jbuening said:
If you want a leak free one, order the Felpro one piece gasket made for the early mustangs. It's around $50 but well worth it IMO. It is a rubber composite with a steel core and leak free performance. Reusable too and no RTV required!

Also, the type or rear main doesn't affect the pan gasket. BUT, the year of pan does. The early pans had ribbing in the pan flange to prevent the cork from squeezing out. The later 5.0/5.8 engines had flat flanges, thus the gaskets are different. Felpro makes a specific gasket for the early pans (early i mean pre 5.0) and is available at autozone. I know you aren't running a 5.0 pan (cause it is rear sump) but they may try to give you a 5.8 pan gasket.
Click to expand...

Well that is an eye opener. I am ordering a new pan by Moroso and I thought that the rear main seal dicatated what oil pan gasket you needed to get.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Feb 14, 2006
#6
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #6
The rear main seal goes in the block and in the rear main cap. Maybe you are confusing it with the rear pan seal?
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 14, 2006
#7
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #7
jbuening said:
The rear main seal goes in the block and in the rear main cap. Maybe you are confusing it with the rear pan seal?
Click to expand...

I am ordering a new Moroso pan from summit for my 351W and will need a new oil pan gasket. The descriptions for the gasket provide that they are either for one or two piece rear main seals. For example:

FPP-1827

Brand: Fel-Pro Performance Gaskets
Product Line: Fel-Pro Performance Oil Pan Gaskets
Gasket Material: Rubber with steel core
Rear Main Seal Style: 2-piece
One Piece Gasket: No


I just want to verify before ordering and shipping here that I need an oil pan gasket for a 2 piece rear main seal style.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Feb 14, 2006
#8
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #8
Isn't the rear main seal for a 351W a bigger diameter than a 302? So the pan gasket should be ordered for a 351W and not just for a small block Ford like "Jegs" advertises. Aren't the pan gaskets different between a 351W and 302, but the rear main bearing cap is the same Outside diameter on a 351W between a one piece seal and a two piece seal?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 15, 2006
#9
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #9
thehueypilot said:
Isn't the rear main seal for a 351W a bigger diameter than a 302? So the pan gasket should be ordered for a 351W and not just for a small block Ford like "Jegs" advertises. Aren't the pan gaskets different between a 351W and 302, but the rear main bearing cap is the same Outside diameter on a 351W between a one piece seal and a two piece seal?
Click to expand...

Crank and the rear main seal for a 351w is larger than a 302. Needs a 351 specific part, a 302 won't fit. Doesn't matter it you are talking 1 pc or 2 pc seal--both are larger than the 302 counterpart.

The rear main cap is also physically larger than a 302, so a 351w will only work with a 351 pan specific gasket. Even the oil pan is 351w specific to clear the larger rear main cap needed to clear the larger crank.

I had both my old 69' block and 89' block setting side by side during my build. jbuening is correct that the block sealing surface has not changed over the years. I believe that 1983 is when the 1 pcs seal appeared in a 351w.

I used an SCE 1 pc rubber oil pan gasket that Summit sells to install my 69' 351w oil pan (original 2 pcs seal block) on my 89' block (1 pcs seal.) Seals perfectly, no issues. It is very pliable rubber and I know it would be hard to install from under the car, but on an engine stand it was a piece of cake. Had I know then the differences of the pan, I would have went with a 1 pcs oil pan seal for a 2 pcs seal block.

To sum it all up for Jerry, if you are truly concerned, choose a pan gasket (any pan gasket) made for a 2 pcs seal (such as your 69' block) and install it. It will work an your later year block and be the best choice for the oil pan that you have. The 1 pcs pan gasket has an edge over the "multiple" pcs ones for sealing.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 15, 2006
#10
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #10
thanks everyone. I was confused and needed the clarification. :SNSign:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
206
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
470
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
624
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
446
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
220
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?