• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Rear suspension question

  • Thread starter Thread starter steeda46
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2004

steeda46

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2000
427
0
0
Fayetteville, GA
Jun 30, 2004
#1
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #1
I'm looking to upgrade the rear 4-link factory suspension for various reasons. My question is this... I'm interested in adding a Panhard bar and upgrading the upper control arms (UCA). (I'm not sure at this point if I want to add a torque arm, atleast right now due to exhaust modification, etc). I noticed on Maximum Motorsports website that they recomend the FRPP UCA with rubber bushing. If I add a Panhard bar is it worth upgrading the UCA or should I skip the Panhard bar and just upgrade the UCA.

Note: I have all Steeda suspension parts and I plan on using Steeda for the C/C plate and UCA, but use MM Panhard bar.
 

Spitfire

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
263
0
0
Weezing in the high desert
Jun 30, 2004
#2
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #2
By adding the panhard bar it will be a bit redundant if you want to keep UCAs (IE no TQ arm). If you have no intention of getting the MM 3 link, just upgrade the control arms. If you eventually want the TQ arm, don't waste money on UCAs that will hit the parts pile when it happens.
 
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jun 30, 2004
#3
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #3
I have the MM Panhard Bar and stock control arms with the KB Blower. It eliminated all the axle shoppiness and it hooks better than before. I'm keeping my stock arms.
 
M

MaxMustang

New Member
Jul 23, 2003
53
0
0
Jun 30, 2004
#4
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #4
The torque arm doesn't really get in the way of the exhaust, the panhard does. The MM panhard works with the stock cat-back and any aftermarket one that routes the pipes exactly the same as stock, Magnaflow doesn't.

I ran with a panhard and FRPP uppers for a while and it did make a noticeable difference. Nowhere near as good as when I added the torque arm and removed the uppers, though.
 

steeda46

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2000
427
0
0
Fayetteville, GA
Jul 1, 2004
#5
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #5
The MM website mentioned different modifications that would be required (exhaust) for the torque arms and not the panhard bar?

Is MM the best place to pick up the tq arm and PH bar? Steeda doesn't sell their pieces individually (atleast not from what I saw).
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jul 1, 2004
#6
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #6
steeda46 said:
I'm looking to upgrade the rear 4-link factory suspension for various reasons. My question is this... I'm interested in adding a Panhard bar and upgrading the upper control arms (UCA). (I'm not sure at this point if I want to add a torque arm, atleast right now due to exhaust modification, etc). I noticed on Maximum Motorsports website that they recomend the FRPP UCA with rubber bushing. If I add a Panhard bar is it worth upgrading the UCA or should I skip the Panhard bar and just upgrade the UCA.

Note: I have all Steeda suspension parts and I plan on using Steeda for the C/C plate and UCA, but use MM Panhard bar.
Click to expand...
You are forgetting the Lower control arms.. probably the weakest link in our rear suspension. Go with MM LCA's and then I've heard the Griggs Pan hard bar is stronger from a shop that installs these things as if they were oil changes. Spend the money on that, then decide whether doing the UCA's is worth it.. Once i had the MM LCA's put on i'm glad I didn't spend money on the UCA's yet.. cuz its already 100 percent stiffer back there with greatly reduced wheelhop.

-wade
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
334
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
328
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
148
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 1:32 AM
bjornsn95
B
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
408
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
507
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?