• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

rear temp. sensor holes on Performer intake = accurate readings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockin_rick
  • Start date Start date Mar 24, 2004
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Mar 24, 2004
#1
  • Mar 24, 2004
  • #1
Are either one of the two holes (circled in yellow) on the back of the Performer's lower intake a good place to put another temp. sender? Would it read correctly, or does the readings come out higher or lower than actual? It doesn't seem that the coolant really flows by them like the front one, so I was wondering if it may produce false readings due to a "hot spot" or stagnant coolant or something.

Rick
 

Attachments

  • rear coolant holes on Performer.webp
    26.1 KB · Views: 285
J

jwcma

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
70
0
6
Bay Area, CA
Mar 24, 2004
#2
  • Mar 24, 2004
  • #2
I installed a sender for an aftermarket gauge in the rear driver side hole. At cruise, it reads about 150-155. I'm guessing that's reading colder than the stock sender location, but I've yet to swap the two senders to compare. I've got a 180 'stat.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 25, 2004
#3
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #3
i have dial up and did not look at your pics, but if it is like a stocker, here are my two cents worth.
the stock gauge sucks, so it is hard to decipher its readings, anyhow. as the rear plug does not seem to get the flow of the front hole, the readings from a rear sender are slow, suggesting that the heat getting to it is at least, partially radiant. thus slower than the front port to show a given temp on warm up, like a delay.
just my thoughts.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 25, 2004
#4
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #4
Those rear holes are not the best place to put a sender. I used to have my Autometer's sender on the driver's side rear and it took forever to come up to temp and it responded to changes the same way. I switched it with the stocker which was up front on the same side and its fast and accurate now. I stocker is slow and never goes above 1/4 now.
 
J

jwcma

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
70
0
6
Bay Area, CA
Mar 25, 2004
#5
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #5
At first, I thought the rear hole was "following" the stock sender location, at a few degrees lower. But reading earlier responses, it seems like it's also slower to respond. Since my aftermarket gauge will also be controlling an electric fan (soon), I will be switching sender locations, or maybe ditching the stock sender altogether.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 25, 2004
#6
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #6
i did the same as 65S.C. did, and it works fine, considering how useless the stock gauge is anyhow.
grab a new parts store sender (like 4 bucks) and put it in the rear port, since it is kinda a pain to access.
good luck.
 

YELLOWLXCOUPE

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2001
236
0
0
Binghamton, NY
Mar 25, 2004
#7
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #7
i agree with all of ya ... i have my auto meter sender in the driver side rear and i dont like it there ... doesnt read well so i plan to switch it soon ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
904
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
737
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?