• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Suspension Rear Upper Control Arm Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rdub6
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2020

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,968
2,949
153
Long Island, NY
Dec 12, 2020
#1
  • Dec 12, 2020
  • #1
I’ve done my research, and I will be going with stock style UCA’s for the rear, as MM suggests.
My question is this..... MM list theirs being good for 79-04.
Rear Upper Control Arms, 1979-2004 Mustang

Other manufacturers, like this Moog, list that its only good for 2000-2004.

moog-rk642744 | Rear Upper Control Arm | 2000-2004 Ford Mustang | MOOG

Rear upper control arm replacement for the 2000-2004 Ford Mustang. Made by MOOG and backed by a 3 year to limited lifetime warranty. In stock and ready to ship out today! moog-rk642744
www.moog-suspension-parts.com


Is there any reason this Moog would not work on the 79-99 cars?

How can one be good for all, but what seems to be identical, only good for 5 model years?
 

HemiRick

I'd be looking at jacking under the house
Jun 28, 2020
723
272
73
Memphis TN
Dec 12, 2020
#2
  • Dec 12, 2020
  • #2
MM rear upper arm has stiffer rubber in it than a stock one.
 
Reactions: Rdub6

Cheapskate207

The left one hangs a little lower
5 Year Member
Jan 12, 2020
761
541
113
Maine
Dec 13, 2020
#3
  • Dec 13, 2020
  • #3
If I recall correctly the MM arms (and lmr) were basically sn95 arms. In fact, they could have just been sn95 arms entirely. Like stated above, they have stiffer rubber.
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000

Cheapskate207

The left one hangs a little lower
5 Year Member
Jan 12, 2020
761
541
113
Maine
Dec 13, 2020
#4
  • Dec 13, 2020
  • #4
This is from MM’s website:

These Ford rear upper control arms are direct replacements for the 1979-2004 Mustang (non-IRS) control arms. They will restore performance lost to old and deteriorating rubber bushings. These control arms have the stiffest rubber bushings available, and are much stiffer than what came originally on the Fox chassis Mustangs. Although Ford Racing Performance Parts claims their bushings to be "twice as stiff" as stock, our testing has shown that while they are much stiffer than Fox chassis bushings, they are identical to the 1994-04 bushings.
While for 1994-04 cars these control arms offer no improvement in performance, as they do on Fox chassis cars, they are a great value when replacing arms with damaged or aged bushings. Because rubber deteriorates simply from age, after several years the control arms are ready for replacement.
 

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,968
2,949
153
Long Island, NY
Dec 13, 2020
#5
  • Dec 13, 2020
  • #5
Thanks! I guess I’ll be going with the MM parts. Just didn’t want to spend the extra money on identical parts, but obviously theirs are an upgraded piece!
 

Cheapskate207

The left one hangs a little lower
5 Year Member
Jan 12, 2020
761
541
113
Maine
Dec 13, 2020
#6
  • Dec 13, 2020
  • #6
I think you’ll find the MM parts aren’t much different than those moot for the sn95’s.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,371
18,119
224
Massachusetts
Dec 14, 2020
#7
  • Dec 14, 2020
  • #7
IIRC there was a change in the upper control arms around 1999 or so that moved the locstion of the bolt holes slightly. It the pinion angle slightly.

I’ll have to see where I can find the info. It’s been a while since I’ve looked into it.

my Steeda arms are stock new edge arms wgere steeda redrilled the mounting holes and tack welded a washer on.

edit2: browsing FordParts. The part number for the 94-98 upper control arm is

F4ZZ-5500-CA​



it does specifically list the arm is for vehicles up to Dec/98, but can’t find any part number listed.
 
Last edited: Dec 14, 2020

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,968
2,949
153
Long Island, NY
Dec 14, 2020
#8
  • Dec 14, 2020
  • #8
I think I’ll just go with MM. If things go right, I’m hoping to do a set of their lower arms as well.
I’m sure they’ve done their homework and rather than guess on the Moogs, and risking having to deal with returns, I’ll spend the extra $30 on what I know will work.
 

BoostedRed89gt

Member
Dec 19, 2019
15
5
13
Albany, OH
Saturday at 1:52 PM
#9
  • Saturday at 1:52 PM
  • #9
Anybody else using the search tool I will update this old thread. I just ordered upper control arms from Maximum Motorsports and MOOG arms are what they send. If I would have known I would have just added to my rockauto order and saved seem money.
 
Reactions: Dakar09
D

Dakar09

Member
Apr 15, 2026
18
23
13
Dedham, MA
Yesterday at 9:31 AM
#10
  • Yesterday at 9:31 AM
  • #10
That's really interesting. I am looking into this right now. For now I have a new set of MOOG rubber bushings coming to put in my stock UCA. And hearing that the MM are just MOOG parts is having me lean to just replacing the rubber on mine for now.

That said, do you notice a different shape or design in the ones they sent from your stock UCAs?
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
6,222
4,318
183
Claremore, OK
Yesterday at 10:48 AM
#11
  • Yesterday at 10:48 AM
  • #11
You will most likely destroy the UCA trying to replace the bushing. They are stamped and don’t handle a lot of twist.

@General karthief - got any NOS laying around?
 
Reactions: Dakar09 and nickyb

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,338
1,548
133
San Diego, CA
Yesterday at 12:10 PM
#12
  • Yesterday at 12:10 PM
  • #12
From MM's website: These control arms are a reproduction of the no-longer-available M-5500-A Ford Racing Performance Parts (FRPP) control arms.

Not sure if thats the same design / P/N as the RockAuto MOOG or even the OEM arms.
 
D

Dakar09

Member
Apr 15, 2026
18
23
13
Dedham, MA
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
#13
  • Yesterday at 12:30 PM
  • #13
AeroCoupe said:
You will most likely destroy the UCA trying to replace the bushing. They are stamped and don’t handle a lot of twist.

@General karthief - got any NOS laying around?
Click to expand...
Greeeeeeeat, Were they not meant to be serviced or just a poorly made part? I don't usually try to replace rubber bushings in old trailing arms anyway, not sure why I wanted to take this on with the Crapstang

EDIT: The Moog part is $35 on Amazon...
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 12:47 PM

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
6,222
4,318
183
Claremore, OK
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
#14
  • Yesterday at 4:40 PM
  • #14
I honestly think the UCA’s and LCA’s were meant to be replaced as a unit.
 
Reactions: Dakar09

BoostedRed89gt

Member
Dec 19, 2019
15
5
13
Albany, OH
Yesterday at 10:07 PM
#15
  • Yesterday at 10:07 PM
  • #15
They are moog control arms. They have moog painted on the arms with part number.

I emailed them based on their webpage description because I could have saved $60 adding the moog arms to my rock auto order.

They responded and this is verbatim from the response email “They are available through us for ease of project orders. I'm sorry. “

Pretty lousy on their part I expected more from the premium vendor. Nothing like getting the shaft.
 

BoostedRed89gt

Member
Dec 19, 2019
15
5
13
Albany, OH
Yesterday at 10:09 PM
#16
  • Yesterday at 10:09 PM
  • #16
Blow the pic up you can see the moog print.
 
Reactions: gkomo

BoostedRed89gt

Member
Dec 19, 2019
15
5
13
Albany, OH
Yesterday at 10:14 PM
#17
  • Yesterday at 10:14 PM
  • #17
Here’s the packaging with moog part number, not M-5500

 
Reactions: Dakar09 and gkomo

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
28,123
10,741
213
polk county florida
Yesterday at 10:19 PM
#18
  • Yesterday at 10:19 PM
  • #18
AeroCoupe said:
You will most likely destroy the UCA trying to replace the bushing. They are stamped and don’t handle a lot of twist.

@General karthief - got any NOS laying around?
Click to expand...
As a matter of fact I do
 
D

Dakar09

Member
Apr 15, 2026
18
23
13
Dedham, MA
Today at 11:46 AM
#19
  • Today at 11:46 AM
  • #19
That's a pretty crap response from MM on why they charge so much. I think maybe you caught them off-guard when you asked that question (and hats off to you for asking, but no need to charge so much extra.

Looks like I'll be ordering the MOOG UCA from Amazon today.

Appreciate the follow-up on this thread, as it did come up in my search earlier this week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes Need help ID’ing which brake lines and seals I need
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Apr 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 14, 2025
limp
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
467
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
R
Rear Upper Control Arm Pivot Point
  • Rcdgl
  • May 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
219
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2025
Rcdgl
R
Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
C
best rear control arms?
  • colehelm
  • Jun 25, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?