• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Rebuild A 351w Or 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven Pech
  • Start date Start date Jun 7, 2017

Steven Pech

New Member
Dec 28, 2015
29
0
1
Jun 7, 2017
#1
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #1
Ok guys. im on the fence between rebuilding my 302 or going to the junk yard and buying/rebuilding a 351w. My goal is to try and hit the 400 hp range. im trying to keep it street/strip. I just need pros and cons. I am a first timer and pretty new to the game. From the research I've been doing I've found that rebuilding either or will cost about the same. I would like your opinions and suggestions. Thanks.
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Jun 7, 2017
#2
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #2
351 will give you lots more options for the future.

Way easier to hit your power goals as well.

The 351 is a much stronger engine as well.

Go for the 351.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Jun 7, 2017
#3
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #3
^ this, but be prepared to spend more money on parts. You'll need several different parts that don't carry over from the 302 - Intake, exhaust, flywheel/flexplate, balancer, and distributor, just to name a few.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,915
10,565
203
polk county florida
Jun 7, 2017
#4
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #4
^^^ room to grow will offset the increase in cost vs the 5.0, I think you can get 400hp easily and be more streetable than the smaller displacement engine. Just my opinion.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Jun 7, 2017
#5
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #5
351....don't be like me....

I have the ability to make more power....but the block won't take it.
A 351 doesn't have to work as hard to make the same power = longevity.
 

Mustanglimey

Active Member
Apr 14, 2012
42
81
38
Hertfordshire UK
Jun 7, 2017
#6
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #6
If you have the option to do either 351w is a no brainer
 

Bossed

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2010
190
247
63
Jun 7, 2017
#7
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #7
Even if they make similar horsepower, the difference in torque is significant . I had a 302 years ago in a Mustang II. Small chamber 289 heads with larger valves, ported and polished, Crane Camshaft, Edelbrock Torker II intake. I built a 351 Windsor, using the cylinder heads and camshaft from the 302, same style intake manifold (for a 351W). The car felt like it had twice the power that it had before. Torque is awesome.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 7, 2017
#8
  • Jun 7, 2017
  • #8
302 hands down, no brainer. Been there, done that. You can build a 500hp stroker 302 for the cost of putting a crap rebuilt 351W in your car. You spend the extra for 351 swap header, the distributor, the motor mounts, oil pan, and you just exceeded the cost of a 4 bolt Dart 302 block that can handle 2000hp. And that's not all the parts. Plus the hood probably won't fit, the spark plugs are harder to get to, the AC lines have to be refitted to clear the headers. Then add 100 other complications I haven't added in this list.

Understand how an engine makes power. The bore is the same on a 302 and 351. The bore is the displacement measure that determines the combustion pressure. The flow rate of the head (couple things aside like valve angle and shrowding which are the same for both engines) determines how much power it can make. The stroke only determines the RPM at which max power is made. A few 100 rpms back and forth can be adjusted with cam retard. There is a bunch of exaggerated info on how much more power the 351 block can handle, but that is predicated on drilling the stock block for 4 bolt mains. An actual stock 2 bolt main 351W isn't much stronger than a stock 302.

Kurt
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 8, 2017
#9
  • Jun 8, 2017
  • #9
revhead347 said:
302 hands down, no brainer. Been there, done that. You can build a 500hp stroker 302 for the cost of putting a crap rebuilt 351W in your car. You spend the extra for 351 swap header, the distributor, the motor mounts, oil pan, and you just exceeded the cost of a 4 bolt Dart 302 block that can handle 2000hp. And that's not all the parts. Plus the hood probably won't fit, the spark plugs are harder to get to, the AC lines have to be refitted to clear the headers. Then add 100 other complications I haven't added in this list.

Understand how an engine makes power. The bore is the same on a 302 and 351. The bore is the displacement measure that determines the combustion pressure. The flow rate of the head (couple things aside like valve angle and shrowding which are the same for both engines) determines how much power it can make. The stroke only determines the RPM at which max power is made. A few 100 rpms back and forth can be adjusted with cam retard. There is a bunch of exaggerated info on how much more power the 351 block can handle, but that is predicated on drilling the stock block for 4 bolt mains. An actual stock 2 bolt main 351W isn't much stronger than a stock 302.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Longer stroke = more piston swept volume, AKA displacement = more air/fuel mass per revolution = more power. MM&FF did a pretty great test on this a few years back, they ran a 306 and a 347 on the dyno, with identical everything for the top end parts, right down to even having the exact same CR. The 347 made significantly more power and torque everywhere in the rev range. Linky: https://goo.gl/uuOY4o

In regards to your statement about block strength, there are lots of examples to the contrary, but maybe one of the best is TonyR85 over on Yellow Bullet. His completely stock shortblock 1990's 351 has been running 8s in the 1/4 @ mid 150s for like 3 years now. Makes like 850ish to the tire. IIRC his first failure was a bent rod. You're just not gonna see a stock 302 do that.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 8, 2017
#10
  • Jun 8, 2017
  • #10
NIKwoaC said:
Longer stroke = more piston swept volume, AKA displacement = more air/fuel mass per revolution = more power. MM&FF did a pretty great test on this a few years back, they ran a 306 and a 347 on the dyno, with identical everything for the top end parts, right down to even having the exact same CR. The 347 made significantly more power and torque everywhere in the rev range. Linky: https://goo.gl/uuOY4o

In regards to your statement about block strength, there are lots of examples to the contrary, but maybe one of the best is TonyR85 over on Yellow Bullet. His completely stock shortblock 1990's 351 has been running 8s in the 1/4 @ mid 150s for like 3 years now. Makes like 850ish to the tire. IIRC his first failure was a bent rod. You're just not gonna see a stock 302 do that.
Click to expand...

You're talking about Tony Reiners. He's in the Sloppy Mechanics junkyard motor division. He pulls a motor out of a van fills it with Chinese hardware and sees how many runs he can get out of it before it blows. That's what those guys do over there. I think it's awesome, but let's be honest, most people value their time a little more than that.

In your article, they used TW 185cc heads, much bigger than a TW 170cc head, which is exactly what I am talking about. In the long long ago, way before this article, MM&FF did the same thing with a stock motor 302 vs a 342 rebuilt both with the stock top end. The 342 made about 6 more hp, which they attributed to the rebuild. You see how neither of these is relevant.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
632
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?