• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

received my thumper heads today.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dastang2
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Apr 2, 2006
#21
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #21
yeah but to do aluminum heads you would need to buy special pushrods to match,a pushrod length checker tool,rockers and all that other junk to just use the heads right. that is why i did this since all stock parts are reused.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 2, 2006
#22
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #22
There is no argument that most aftermarket alumimum heads are a league over Thumper E7's, but while going into that league your also making things more complicated. Thumper heads are a bolt on, bolt off mod, while most aftermarket heads, your looking at lots of "misc." items and headaches. IMO, with a stock bottom end, Thumper's are probally one of the best ways to go.

AFR 165's, TFS TW's aren't tha great when compared to AFR 205-225's or TFS R's or highports. The Stock block is a waste of machine work when compared to a Dart or World block. It's all in how much you want to spend.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 2, 2006
#23
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #23
Just cuirious but why not just GT40P's? You can take an Explorer motor and throw a cam and roller rockers on it and run 12.90s all day long. I'm sure you can find GT40s for what you'd pay for Thumpers (no offense to Thumper or anything....but think about it...why doesn't he just port GT40Ps and make that much more power?).
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Apr 2, 2006
#24
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #24
he does at a higher cost. i don't feel like getting different headers. i am not looking for the most power anyway. just something to run better than e6 heads.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 2, 2006
#25
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #25
dastang2 said:
he does at a higher cost. i don't feel like getting different headers. i am not looking for the most power anyway. just something to run better than e6 heads.
Click to expand...

Hell better than E6s....either E5s or E7s. E6s are possibly the worst heads ever on a 5.0.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Apr 3, 2006
#26
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #26
79pacecar, what modifications did you have when you bolted on the thumpers for 40 whp?
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 3, 2006
#27
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #27
1.7RRs, TFS track heat, 65mm tb, 15 degrees timing, and 40psi of fuel pressure. With a totaly stock set up at 15 degrees advanced with BBK headers, off road h-pipe and magnaflow catback it put down 220rwhp. Now it puts down 261. I had it dynoed at 10 degrees timing and the fuel at 44psi and it put down 247, then at the current setup and got 261.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Apr 3, 2006
#28
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #28
kpack5982 said:
anyone know of what the flow is for the thumpers versus stock?
Click to expand...

www.thumperoforangepark.com

http://www.hunterstyle.com/thumper/headflow.php


See the second link for the flow info.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Apr 3, 2006
#29
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #29
im seriously considering these and maybe a shot of the dry juice. what do you guys like for R.R.'s?? thumper reccomends harland sharp.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Apr 3, 2006
#30
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #30
http://www.yellaterra.com.au/stealth.php

Ford EFI Windsor 5.0/5.8 V8
Mustang, F series Truck
1.72:1 RATIO


Replaces the original pedestal rockers with strong, stable shaft rocker system, that bolts straight on original 5/16" mounts. 1.72 Ratio for noticeable power boost. Available in adjustable and non-adjustable versions for solid or hydraulic lifter camshafts.



Order Part Number:
ST 2027 (Hydraulic)
ST 2028 (Adjustable)



My buddy just put a set on his gt, They are adjustable pedestal mounts very nice quality,Super quiet youd never know they are on there.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Apr 3, 2006
#31
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #31
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Just cuirious but why not just GT40P's? You can take an Explorer motor and throw a cam and roller rockers on it and run 12.90s all day long. I'm sure you can find GT40s for what you'd pay for Thumpers (no offense to Thumper or anything....but think about it...why doesn't he just port GT40Ps and make that much more power?).
Click to expand...


I posted this along time ago about my gt40 head exp.

as far as price goes.

gt40 heads used 400$, .550 lift springs, valve job, mill, tank, flux was another 500-550$ so yes that is 900-950$ for STOCK gt40s that were basicly freshend up as after I had a head gasket issue after I first put them on (bad gasket no install, hardware, other part failure issue) and wanted to make sure things were good with them. The machine work was done about a year after I first bought them and about 2-3 months after first install. Now it is very realistic to get the heads checked and new springs to get them fresh so I think that is/was a smart move. Yes I could have bought a used set of alum. heads but would have still prob. spent the money to get them "fresh" so that price of the work would be added to the price of those used alum. heads as well.

If you think about that thumper e7's are not bad at all since he does the checking and freshening up and port work.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 3, 2006
#32
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #32
I used Crane Cobra 1.7RRs.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 4, 2006
#33
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #33
blksn955.o said:
I posted this along time ago about my gt40 head exp.

as far as price goes.

gt40 heads used 400$, .550 lift springs, valve job, mill, tank, flux was another 500-550$ so yes that is 900-950$ for STOCK gt40s that were basicly freshend up as after I had a head gasket issue after I first put them on (bad gasket no install, hardware, other part failure issue) and wanted to make sure things were good with them. The machine work was done about a year after I first bought them and about 2-3 months after first install. Now it is very realistic to get the heads checked and new springs to get them fresh so I think that is/was a smart move. Yes I could have bought a used set of alum. heads but would have still prob. spent the money to get them "fresh" so that price of the work would be added to the price of those used alum. heads as well.

If you think about that thumper e7's are not bad at all since he does the checking and freshening up and port work.
Click to expand...


Yeah i'm not at all knocking his work, i'm just saying it's kinda like polishing a turd. I guess we country folk just do things a little differently, like pull GT40Ps off a fire damaged engine, bolt'em straight onto a block and run 12.90s on slicks. BUT, that doesnt mean it isn't smarter/better/neater/albeit more expensive to go the route you went. When i think about buying used heads, i think about the absolute cheapest way i can go to make power...if i saw any chance of spending 1k on heads, i'd go the extra mile and get aluminum. 900-950 can just about get Edelbrocks, and they'll outflow GT40s all day long. Again....just to make clear...i've talked to Thumper a billion times and i admire what he does, but "I" wouldn't start with E7s to make power.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 4, 2006
#34
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #34
Why were E6 heads being run on your 89 anyhow?
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Apr 4, 2006
#35
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #35
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah i'm not at all knocking his work, i'm just saying it's kinda like polishing a turd. I guess we country folk just do things a little differently, like pull GT40Ps off a fire damaged engine, bolt'em straight onto a block and run 12.90s on slicks. BUT, that doesnt mean it isn't smarter/better/neater/albeit more expensive to go the route you went. When i think about buying used heads, i think about the absolute cheapest way i can go to make power...if i saw any chance of spending 1k on heads, i'd go the extra mile and get aluminum. 900-950 can just about get Edelbrocks, and they'll outflow GT40s all day long. Again....just to make clear...i've talked to Thumper a billion times and i admire what he does, but "I" wouldn't start with E7s to make power.
Click to expand...

gt40's are just e7's with bigger valves, aren't they. for 700, i got nice springs, full rebuild, performance valve job, and nice work done. sounds like a deal to me. it's a piece together motor and these heads were given to me from the machine shop a few years ago after giving them some truck heads. they gave me these and i didn't find out until a few years later.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 4, 2006
#36
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #36
dastang2 said:
gt40's are just e7's with bigger valves, aren't they. for 700, i got nice springs, full rebuild, performance valve job, and nice work done. sounds like a deal to me. it's a piece together motor and these heads were given to me from the machine shop a few years ago after giving them some truck heads. they gave me these and i didn't find out until a few years later.
Click to expand...

No, far from it. They have updated combustion chambers and spark plug angles which promote a more efficient combustion in the cylinder. You can't just port E7s and get GT40s. Again, it kinda feels like everyone's taking defense to what i said....that's not what i'm saying. I'm not knocking his work on the heads...i was even looking into buying them myself at one time untill a friend of mine started running 12s on Explorer motors. It's not like that's the holy grail of performance either, but for me it's the cheapest way for me to get going fast and cheap. My comparison between GT40ps and E7s is like...why build a 347 stroker when you can start with a 351 block and stroke it to a 426? There are definately pros and cons on that just like everyone is giving about the head topic...but for me, starting with a better product and ending up with more in the long run is the way i'd rather go.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Apr 4, 2006
#37
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #37
Something from the past...interesting.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=403164

Pay particular attention to post #28 from Ed Curtis.
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Apr 4, 2006
#38
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #38
8950HO said:
Something from the past...interesting.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=403164

Pay particular attention to post #28 from Ed Curtis.
Click to expand...


To be fair id read the entire thread not just that one post.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 4, 2006
#39
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #39
8950HO said:
Something from the past...interesting.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=403164

Pay particular attention to post #28 from Ed Curtis.
Click to expand...

Geez no kidding...i hope i'm not looking like a Thumper basher or something? I simply said why doesn't he start with a better head? Truth be told, i've never "had Thumper's product in my hands" so i'm only going by what i know...that i myself can score a set of GT40Ps for about 3-400 bucks, and as long as they're mechanically sound (i wouldn't buy'em otherwise) i just bolt them on and go...no extra cleaning up or machining necessary....add a good cam and roller rockers and if the rest of your car is up to par, you're in the 12s. Grant it, not everyone will see those kinds of ETs, but they are possible.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Apr 5, 2006
#40
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #40
his heads are garranteed unlike joe smoes heads down the street that could be all screwed up.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
290
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Resolved Three way cat converters..?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
PonyGTrider
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
193
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
409
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?