• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Removing dogbone bracket.. bad news!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mavrick
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2004

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Aug 19, 2004
#1
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #1
Read this post on the corral and i figure you guys might benefit from the info.

Corral Thread

To sum it up, when removing the dogbone from the 8.8 mustang rear end, be sure to re-install the bracket over top the rear end with shorter hardware to avoid wheelhop issues!
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Aug 19, 2004
#2
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #2
i read that one and am not sure why one would remove it in the first place. afterward, we get all the threads about why they have DS vibes, etc, and dont know that they even removed it. the weight is in about as good a spot as you can have weight anyhow.

just my two cents.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Aug 19, 2004
#3
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #3
From what I've read and heard the dog bone become's pretty much useless when aftermarket numerically higher gears are added. ?? Yes if factory gears are still in use then it is not recomended to remove the dog bone, but hell if you got aftermarket gear's then it sure dosn't hurt to remove some dead weight.
When I threw 3:73's in my 8.8 back in the day I removed the dog bone and had no problem's at all... No Wheel hop or balance problem's what so ever.

??????Interesting????

Shon
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Aug 19, 2004
#4
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #4
The dog bone topic is much like cross drilled-slotted rotors. The debate can and probably will go on forever. I took mine off and have not had any problems. I know several people have removed it with no problems either. I am pretty sure there was a reason for it, but not sure why because Ford never told us why. Just my 2 pennies worth...

Tim
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 19, 2004
#5
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #5
Devices like the dogbone are mass dampners. They are there to damp certain frequency based vibrations -- to eliminate resonances in a certain frequency range. They're quite common on the drivelines of cars - certain automatic tranny's over the years had rather large masses hung off the back for the same reason. The size, shape and location of the mass is important to its proper functioning. Ford likely discovered that under certain operating conditions over a long period of time vibrations in a certain frequency range could cause problems - precisely what, I don't know. But it usually involves something cracking or breaking.

I wouldn't expect you'd notice much of anything removing it - at least in the short term. What's going to happen long term is anyone's guess.
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Aug 19, 2004
#6
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #6
Not referring to the dogbone itself guys, they're referring to the plate that it bolts onto, that sits on top of the rear end, that is where the pinion snubber hits the axle... without it, aparently there could be problems. I wouldn't doubt it, because there are some pretty smart guys over there on the corral.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 19, 2004
#7
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #7
If you wind it up enought to hit the snubber you have other issues to take care of....

If you hit the snubber it will unload the tires anyway...

Really depends on what kind of rear suspension you have.
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Aug 19, 2004
#8
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #8
Cool.. seems to me that the corral makes a big deal out of mostly insignificant issues.

I trust you guys more though, just thought i'd bring it up.
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Aug 19, 2004
#9
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #9
It's kinda common sense to put the snubber plate back on. I can't believe some actually didn't, that's too funny. I removed my dog bone and reinstalled the bracket w/ shorter bolts
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Aug 19, 2004
#10
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #10
I seem to recall the 'top' of the bracket not being much more than sheetmetal plate -- I wouldn't think it's for much more than helping to mount the weight. I would think the rear end can handle itself against the rubber pinion snubber without the aid of a little piece of sheetmetal if that's what it's actually for.

With that said, I agree with Rick, if your bouncing off the pinion snubber, a little bracket is not going to help with traction issues.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Aug 19, 2004
#11
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #11
seriously..............................i had 4.10's on a old lx i had didnt have the dog bone had a vibe in it but i think that was outta balance tires..........
 

90LX306

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
433
0
16
Warren, R.I.
Aug 19, 2004
#12
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #12
i dont think that the arguement of higher numerical gears dont require a dogbone hols water becaust i recently swapped in a turbocoupe rear w/factory 3.55's and it had a dogbone on it and i just left it there. Ford engineer's are alittle smarter than i am i beleive so i figured if they put it there, there must have been a rason. Its not like ur going to drop a second in the 1/4 and pull 1g on a skid pad if u pull it off, what does it weigh a whole 10lbs?
 

def1eppard

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
889
0
0
DFW, TX
Aug 19, 2004
#13
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #13
Whats a dogbone anyways?
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Aug 19, 2004
#14
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #14
the question is does everything equiped with an 8.8 have one, trucks included.
my guess would be because ford used the 8 and 9 inch for so long, when they came up with the 8.8, being it doesnt have a removeable carrier it's there to dampen vibration so there's less likelyhood of the housing fatigueing right there where the pinions at.
i left mine on, i suppose if weight is an issue most people could probably clean the garbage and extra crap they have in there cars out and save more weight than removing the dog bone....lol
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Aug 20, 2004
#15
  • Aug 20, 2004
  • #15
Rear ends have been around for quite a long time, w/o dogbones. It's just another Ford thing like the power steering cooler. Took that off too. If you've ever removed one you'd see why that bracket with the bump plate needs to go back on.

I had an 8.8 under my old 97 F150, it didn't have one on it.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Aug 20, 2004
#16
  • Aug 20, 2004
  • #16
timewarped1972 said:
the question is does everything equiped with an 8.8 have one, trucks included.
my guess would be because ford used the 8 and 9 inch for so long, when they came up with the 8.8, being it doesnt have a removeable carrier it's there to dampen vibration so there's less likelyhood of the housing fatigueing right there where the pinions at.
Click to expand...

Full-sized trucks do not have them (unsure about smaller ones). They used them in trucks before cars AFAIK, and I've not heard of any problems with trucks or cars rattling their rear ends apart.
 
K

kreil45

Member
Mar 18, 2011
36
0
6
Tallahassee, Fl
Dec 14, 2012
#17
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #17
could a bad dogbone cause a clunk.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Dec 14, 2012
#18
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #18
I left my Dogbone in place, it really doesnt weigh that much and its in a good place.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Dec 15, 2012
#19
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #19
No Dogbone here with a 383 stroker. No issues. I also removed a 25lb weight behind the bumper on the passenger side that said "25lbs" on it.

Ford used to add double cardan u joints and a damper on the drive shaft of Lincoln Mark 7's to supposedly remove negative harmonics. I have had the damper and cardan joint removed and rebuilt the drive shaft with new steel and a balancing and had better results than the orig. configuration.

Some guys get all kinds of wheel hop from removing quad shocks and some are lucky and have no issues. Personally i think quad shocks on a Mustang was a crappy bandaid for lack of better control arms and suspension.

I personally thing that Ford and other companies will only go so far with factory balancing and harmonics control. Sometimes its cheaper to just add a fix like a "Dogbone" than to SFI balance a OEM drivetrain from the factory.

Chris
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
722
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
449
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
309
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
738
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
657
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?