• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Removing smog equipment 1966

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sbars
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2022
S

Sbars

Member
Aug 21, 2022
4
1
13
Morgan Hill, CA
Aug 21, 2022
#1
  • Aug 21, 2022
  • #1
Hello everyone. I am looking to remove the smog equipment from my 1966 with 289. I saw a couple threads from 2005 here about how to plug the holes that will be in the manifold. But no real answers whether they need to be special material, etc. can I just screw a bolt in there? Any guidance, comments, tips or ideas are appreciated. Thank you!
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Aug 21, 2022
#2
  • Aug 21, 2022
  • #2
I know nothing about smog pumps and the like...but I do know that any pipe-type fitting(hose barb, etc) is going to be a NPT(national pipe thread) fitting. For things like intake manifolds they are usually 1/8, 1/4, or at most 3/8 depending on the size of the hose involved. In other words...bolt threads wont work, you will need NPT plugs, steel, brass or aluminum works for the intake manifold...but if plugging a hole like that on the exhaust manifold you want steel or iron
 
S

Sbars

Member
Aug 21, 2022
4
1
13
Morgan Hill, CA
Aug 21, 2022
#3
  • Aug 21, 2022
  • #3
Thank you. I actually found some manifold plugs designed to fill the holes in the manifold from a mustang parts supplier.
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 22, 2022
#4
  • Aug 22, 2022
  • #4
I’m curious. Is this factory 1966 for a CA car? When did Ford put air pumps in all their cars?
I’d save any parts in case the CARB or EPA gets picky about old cars or someone wants to restore it.
I don’t know air injection did much without cats, but that’s enough to fail a visual inspection.
 
S

Sbars

Member
Aug 21, 2022
4
1
13
Morgan Hill, CA
Aug 22, 2022
#5
  • Aug 22, 2022
  • #5
This is factory smog. It was an option in 1966 and became standard in 67 or 68. I primarily want to remove it to clean the engine up and make it easier to work on. I will be keeping the parts just since it was an option on the car I'll always have it just in case the time ever comes to sell. Some have told me I should see an increase in performance so I'm curious about that.
Thanks.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 22, 2022
#6
  • Aug 22, 2022
  • #6
Sbars said:
This is factory smog. It was an option in 1966 and became standard in 67 or 68. I primarily want to remove it to clean the engine up and make it easier to work on. I will be keeping the parts just since it was an option on the car I'll always have it just in case the time ever comes to sell. Some have told me I should see an increase in performance so I'm curious about that.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
A high school friend’s 68 302 three speed coupe did not have more than a pvc and the dual port distributor. It sure looked like a stock 2bbl. That’s why I was wondering if it was a CA thing or a swapped engine, including the exhaust.
Anyway, got pics of the job or the car?
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,531
713
143
Roy, Utah
Aug 22, 2022
#7
  • Aug 22, 2022
  • #7
Yes the CARB had air pumps mandated way back then
The California Air Research Board is still at it
 
S

Sbars

Member
Aug 21, 2022
4
1
13
Morgan Hill, CA
Aug 23, 2022
#8
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #8
7991LXnSHO said:
A high school friend’s 68 302 three speed coupe did not have more than a pvc and the dual port distributor. It sure looked like a stock 2bbl. That’s why I was wondering if it was a CA thing or a swapped engine, including the exhaust.
Anyway, got pics of the job or the car?
Click to expand...
Hi All. So as it has been said, the smog equiptment was an option in 66/67 then sounds like it became standard in 1968. Not sure if that was CA only or all of the USA. Thanks for the comments and thoughts. Here are a couple pics plus a copy of section 12 in the Ford Shop Manual showing the complete Thermactor Exhaust System. For sure I will have to remove the valve covers to get those tiny nuts to loosen on the air manifold assembly.
 

Attachments

  • smog 6.webp
    260.7 KB · Views: 624
  • smog 5.webp
    380.7 KB · Views: 477
  • smog 4.webp
    347.1 KB · Views: 423
  • smog 3.webp
    382.1 KB · Views: 414
  • smog 2.webp
    329.9 KB · Views: 468
  • smog 1.webp
    433 KB · Views: 436

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,531
713
143
Roy, Utah
Aug 24, 2022
#9
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • #9
That is a California emissions car and clean
Going to be very difficult to keep it stock, but do it
 
G

GotMojo

New Member
Dec 16, 2019
23
1
3
California
Dec 4, 2023
#10
  • Dec 4, 2023
  • #10
Sbars said:
Thank you. I actually found some manifold plugs designed to fill the holes in the manifold from a mustang parts supplier.
Click to expand...
Would you please pass on the name of the supplier.
 

Mcmahst

5 Year Member
Jan 19, 2021
676
263
83
Laguna Woods CA, fort Mohave AZ
Dec 22, 2023
#11
  • Dec 22, 2023
  • #11
Don’t expect to achieve any additional power you can feel. That system affects the unburnt fuel in the exhaust stream, so post cylinder combustion. And, it been stated several times on many different Mustang forums, the Ford air pump uses almost no HP to run. Yes, it will clean it up, but then you’ll have just another striped engine compartment, like a lot of other cars. I think the original system looks cool, but I’m old!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
476
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
D
Intermittant P0411 on my 2000 V6 Mustang
  • DaBard
  • Apr 29, 2022
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2024
DaBard
D
2004 Mustang V6 3.9L 40th Anniversary Edition Brake Fluid Leak
  • moelzokm
  • Jun 10, 2022
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2022
Mustang5L5
4
I don't own a Mustang!
  • '46Ford
  • Sep 17, 2020
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Sep 18, 2020
'46Ford
4
Engine Question on engine harness connectors.
  • Gs1987GT
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2021
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?