• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Replaced my MGW shifter with the Steeda Tri-Ax

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tripoli
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Tripoli

Member
Mar 30, 2005
208
0
16
Dallas, TX
Apr 7, 2008
#1
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #1
Given everything I've read on these forums, what I've just done is contrary to what many people on here have recommended. I now count myself among the few who can claim to have tried more than one shifter on this car, and in fact, this is technically the 5th shifter my car has seen (stock and Tri-Ax on my T-3650, and stock, MGW, and Tri-Ax on my T56).

I got my T56 along with the MGW shifter and a new McLeod clutch setup almost a year ago now. I daily drive my car and frequently take her to the track. When I first got the new setup, I was having trouble shifting quickly like I had been able to with the T-3650. Evening slamming 2nd and 4th was sometimes problematic. No matter what I did, there was always a very definite *clunk...clunk* when I shifted. It would never shift cleanly into the next gear without briefly catching in-between. Power shifting was completely out of the question. In numerous attempts, I missed the shift every time, regardless of which gear I was trying to hit.

As months passed and my track times suffered, I spoke with the people at D&D Performance who sold me the T56, I spoke with Amber at Six Speeds Inc., Archie at Lone Star Performance, MWG, and even the guys at Dallas Mustang. We decided I may have glazed the carbon-fiber components of my synchros, so I was advised to try gently re-breaking in the transmission again. (I'd like to note that the afore mentioned companies were wonderful in helping me through these problems. ) I also swapped to Mobil 1 synthetic ATF at Amber's recommendation. None of this helped.

We tried adjusting my clutch engagement points upwards and downwards, but again, no improvement.

At this point, a famous quote came to mind: "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

Before I purchased the MGW shifter for my T56, I spent a lot of time on these and other forums reading people's reviews and opinions about many aftermarket shifters. I called the companies that manufactured the various shifters to see just why each of them thought theirs was the best, and why others were inferior. I eventually settled on the MGW, having found a few people who had actually switched from the Pro 5.0 to the MGW and loved it. Now, having eliminated every other easy to test cause of my problems, I decided to start researching shifters again, now 11 months after purchasing my MGW shifter.

After speaking to all the afore mentioned companies again, and also to the people at Pro 5.0, I this time decided to go back to the Steeda Tri-Ax, having had pretty good experiences with it on my T3650. (The folks at Pro 5.0 were, like the others, very helpful and surprisingly unbiased. A friend has a Pro 5.0 on his F-Body and it is amazing.)

I installed my new Tri-Ax earlier this evening, and the difference was like night and day. You have to drive the car to really feel the difference in these two shifters. Sitting still, running through the gears really doesn't feel very different between the two. But when you're shifting above 5,000 RPM, or powershifting at nearly 7,000 RPM like me, the improvement is incredible. The shifter effortlessly goes where you want it. The feel is much more solid and there is almost none of the notchiness characteristic of my MGW shifter.

If someone from MGW reads this, please understand that my intent here is not to bash your product, it is simply to express my opinion to help my fellow racers and aggressive drivers. I hope you take this as constructive criticism, using this information to better your product. From the moment I opened the box and saw it, I thought the MGW was a quality piece. It was solid, clean-looking, and I absolutely love the handle design. In fact, Steeda and Pro 5.0 really do need to improve upon their handle designs. I particularly like how the orange MGW handle is tilted backwards, so the shift knob is rotated about 15 degrees towards the driver. I found this very helpful when slamming 3rd gear, as it helped keep my hand from slipping off the shift knob.
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Apr 7, 2008
#2
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #2
Dude WTF,
I also had steeda tri-ax and went with MGW. Sold my tri-ax at ebay and was happy with new mgw shifter . Since I got my mgw , I cannot seems to shift fast or powershift. Most all the time at track high rpm I mis shift 2nd to 3rd. Even some time it mis-shift to 2nd gear. I used to run 13.5 1/4 with fast shifting and now I run 14 sec to 14.3 1/4 mile. With MGW I cannot seems to shift fast as I was with my steeda
 
R

RBR BRNR

New Member
Apr 8, 2008
4
0
0
Apr 8, 2008
#3
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #3
lvmustanggt said:
Dude WTF,
I also had steeda tri-ax and went with MGW. Sold my tri-ax at ebay and was happy with new mgw shifter . Since I got my mgw , I cannot seems to shift fast or powershift. Most all the time at track high rpm I mis shift 2nd to 3rd. Even some time it mis-shift to 2nd gear. I used to run 13.5 1/4 with fast shifting and now I run 14 sec to 14.3 1/4 mile. With MGW I cannot seems to shift fast as I was with my steeda
Click to expand...

:/ 14.3?!! are you driving and shifting right? My car makes 250 HP to the wheel, and running street tires, and i can run 13.8 in the 1/4 mile the whole day! there has to be something wrong,

oh forget to mention i have the MGW and love it, would never switch to anything else!
 

04fullitgt

I shower with poo
Nov 13, 2006
0
0
0
Crest Hill, Illinois
Apr 8, 2008
#4
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #4
I recently installed my MGW also, The build quality is excellent and like you said, the handle of the angle is also great, Im just having trouble getting it into 3rd gear now
 
R

ROUSH1

New Member
Jan 30, 2007
34
0
0
Apr 8, 2008
#5
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #5
i have the tri-ax on my 3650 and i wouldnt change a thing, and yes i have driven a car with a 3650 with a mgw orange handle the solid feel is just not there with the mgw. but to each his own my buddy with the mgw wouldnt change a thing about his setup either.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Apr 8, 2008
#6
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #6
i've had many shifters.

on my 3650 i have stock, tri-ax and MGW
on my T56 i've had Pro 5.0 and MGW

i have to say i LOVE the MGW better than any of the others. the tri-ax would be second best then stock then pro 5.0. the pro 5.0 was the worst shifter i have ever used. i would always hit the dash when shifting. MGW FTW!!
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Apr 8, 2008
#7
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #7
04fullitgt said:
I recently installed my MGW also, The build quality is excellent and like you said, the handle of the angle is also great, Im just having trouble getting it into 3rd gear now
Click to expand...


Noob.

I loved my MGW....but it was the only aftermarket I'd ever tried. I guess the feeling of a shifter is subjective enough to be able to enjoy various shifters at different levels.

All I can say, is a wooden stick would be better than the stocker!
 
B

Black'02

Member
Mar 5, 2006
100
0
17
Rochester, NY
Apr 8, 2008
#8
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #8
Ive got an MGW and have absolutel no problem with mine at all. Im stunned to see people missing the 2-3 shift as well. I know the centering springs are stong enough in mine that all I really have to do is push it out of second and the thing practically jumps into 3rd when driving hard. Glad the fix you had for you car was relatively inexpensive though.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Apr 8, 2008
#9
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #9
Everyone has the personal prefferences, nothing wrong with that.

I know people that love the tri-ax and people that love the MGW, but not too many that love the pro 5.0.
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Apr 8, 2008
#10
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #10
same situation here, i love my tri-ax....but i have not used any others.
 

1992 2.3LX

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
885
0
0
Ky
Apr 8, 2008
#11
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #11
I am not rolling the MGW Kool Aid either.

They are great build and a solid piece I just don't like the way it feels compared to my UPR.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Apr 8, 2008
#12
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #12
i have the mgw and i love it. It does have really strong springs but it just seems to pull it into gear. I've never had a different one but i'm sure the steeda piece is a good one.
 
F

ForPointSex

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
395
0
16
Mercer, NJ
Apr 8, 2008
#13
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #13
I had a Tri-Ax and now I have a MGW. If the Tri-Ax wasn't so noisy, I'd switch back to the tri-ax.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Apr 8, 2008
#14
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #14
IMO MGW for mostly daily driving

UPR or Steeda for the track

I miss my UPR at the track, but I love my MGW in traffic
 

LucasMelo

New Member
Feb 9, 2002
34
0
0
Miami, FL
Apr 8, 2008
#15
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #15
I'm confused now!!!!

I was going to buy a MGW shifter this week just because I keep missing shifts a high rpms, specially 2nd and 3rd!!

Is the MGW really not good at high RPMS????

I want to hear from people that had both! Please!!!
 
Y

Y2kSlvrVert

New Member
May 30, 2007
22
0
0
Cali/LA area
Apr 8, 2008
#16
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #16
Steeda IMO
 
C

ceracer33

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
118
1
0
Apr 8, 2008
#17
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #17
never tried the mgw but i do love my tri ax. i rarely miss shifts with it, and when i do its just b.c i was being lazy and not paying attention. its a great shifter for everyday driving or the track. no problems power shifting a 3650 tranny at 6200 rpms.
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Apr 8, 2008
#18
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #18
wired angle of mgw handle makes me miss 3rd most all the time at high rpm
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Apr 9, 2008
#19
  • Apr 9, 2008
  • #19
I have a MGW on my GT and a tri-ax on my Cobra. I feel a LOT more comfortable shifting the MGW on my GT. Both cars have the t56 tranny.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Apr 9, 2008
#20
  • Apr 9, 2008
  • #20
LucasMelo said:
I'm confused now!!!!

I was going to buy a MGW shifter this week just because I keep missing shifts a high rpms, specially 2nd and 3rd!!

Is the MGW really not good at high RPMS????

I want to hear from people that had both! Please!!!
Click to expand...

MGW is great at all RPMs, just not for power shifting (speed shifting).
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Console Heat after MGW shifter install
  • KirkACola
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
530
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
3
Hammer shifter problems
  • 387lx
  • Apr 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
170
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 11, 2026
General karthief
2008 Mustang Bullitt stuck in Fifth gear
  • Jester67
  • Jul 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
411
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Jester67
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
387
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Monday at 2:45 PM
squeak93
J
Low RPM jerking
  • Justinkins
  • Jul 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
135
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 11, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?