• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Restricted Brakes

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93CalypsoConvert
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2023
  • Tags Tags
    brakes
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#1
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #1
My car is a 1993 with the factory 4 cylinder brakes. It is a convertible, so it uses the V8 booster, even though the rest of the system is 4 cylinder.


My symptoms... This is hard to explain, bear with me:
My brake pedal cannot move quickly. Even if I press hard on the pedal, it will take about 2 seconds to reach its desired position. Its almost like there is a restriction in the system preventing fluid from moving quickly. I am 99% sure I do not have air in the system. I have bled it over and over again.
In a normal vehicle, if you hammer the brakes, you get an instant response. But I have to hold constant pressure and wait while the pedal travels.

Here is what I've done:
  • New soft lines
  • New brake drum cylinders
  • New brake pads and brake shoes
  • Resurfaced rotors
  • New master cylinder (bench bled)
  • New brake booster vacuum line (full manifold vacuum)
  • They've been bled many times.
I have a B303 cam, but I still get plenty of vac signal. The brakes do not pull to either side.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,848
10,526
203
polk county florida
Mar 12, 2023
#2
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #2
Change the booster??
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#3
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #3
A common issue is that the combo valve under the MC corroded inside and bits of rust start blocking the ports in the valve and act like check valves.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#4
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #4
Since the diver's side caliper does not go through the combination valve, wouldn't that make the car pull to the left if a restriction was present in the valve?


Also, when I press the brake, there is a hiss from the brake booster. It isn't a sustained hiss, but just a singular "pshhh" noise at the pedal moves.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#5
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #5
It’s possible the restriction is in the rear line, which wouldn’t affect the two fronts.

Not saying this is 100% the cause, but as you check other things one thing to keep in mind.


How do the brakes feel with the engine off? How’s pedal and travel distance?
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#6
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #6
With engine off, and no vacuum in the booster, the pedal is firm and feels normal.

Could I crack the rear circuit loose and test the brakes? Would that allow me to test the restricted rear circuit theory?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#7
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #7
Before we go that far, did you adjust booster pushrod lenght when you installed booster/MC?
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#8
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #8
I did not.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#9
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #9
I tore the proportioning valve apart and cleaned it. No affect.

Should I be able to blow air through both inputs of the valve? I can.

Now, the brake booster rod. My brakes don’t drag, nor is there any pedal travel before the brakes begin to apply.

Things are pointing towards the booster itself. I have 13 inches of idle vacuum.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#10
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #10
15-18 inches is typical for a vacuum system to work well. 13 is close.

do you have the cam installed straight up? Sometimes timing can play a role in vacuum level.

Do the brakes feel any different at higher rpm?
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#11
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #11
Yes it’s straight up. I did not degree the cam. I don’t think it’s a vacuum issue. When downshifting and vacuum spikes, brake force is not increased.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#12
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #12
Brake booster binding? Pedal bind? Does it feel like a physical restriction on the pedal?

What parts have not been replaced since you have been trying to correct this issue?

But you said you had the issue and replaced the booster? But still the problem remains?

Sorry to spitball, but this is kinda one of those things I wish I could inspect in person.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#13
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #13
No binding. Pedal feels good. I’ve never replaced the booster. I just ensured it was getting full manifold vacuum and the check valve was working. Booster is original as far as I know.

The only things not replaced are the calipers, proportioning valve, booster, hard lines.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2023
#14
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #14
Original 4 cyl booster or the larger 5.0 booster?
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 12, 2023
#15
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • #15
Original larger 5.0 booster. 4 cylinder convertibles came with larger booster but smaller brakes.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,798
3,931
183
Claremore, OK
Mar 13, 2023
#16
  • Mar 13, 2023
  • #16
Sounds like the booster is bad. Pedal should get immediately easier to push when the motor is running due to the booster aiding in the required foot force for braking. The only think that seems to be changing is with the motor running the pedal no longer moves downward smoothly / takes more time. This to me indicates that booster is done.

If you ever see yourself going to the SN95 brakes and you determine it is the booster you may want to look at installing the 1993 Cobra booster.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 13, 2023
#17
  • Mar 13, 2023
  • #17
For some reason I i read the initial post and thought that it said you did replace the booster. But now i see it was just the line.

At this point i would suspect the booster as well, but I hate firing the parts cannon off without confirming. Only other suggestion would be to maybe check the booster check valve for proper operation. The grommets can leak, or the check valve can fail to prevent flow to the vac source. You can pull that out and test by just blowing through it.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 13, 2023
#18
  • Mar 13, 2023
  • #18
The booster is definitely doing something. It gets easier with engine running. I just don’t think it’s doing enough.

Almost like it’s slow to assist… That’s why I thought there might be a fluid restriction.

I tried a full force stop last night on a soaking wet road and couldn’t lock any tires up.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Mar 13, 2023
#19
  • Mar 13, 2023
  • #19
When you bled the brakes. How was fluid flow out of the bleeders?

You said you replaced all the soft lines The 2 fronts and the axle line? SO that would rule out collapsed hose.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 13, 2023
#20
  • Mar 13, 2023
  • #20
Fronts have nice flow, rears have decent flow.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
473
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
1970 brake issue. Bad booster or?
  • All Stock93
  • May 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
686
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
All Stock93
Brakes Foxbody Brakes still soft
  • 86posmustang
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
443
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2025
nicholase
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
46
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
G
66’ drum bleeding
  • Geno66
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
111
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?