• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Rocker Arm Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter foureyefox347
  • Start date Start date Nov 21, 2013

foureyefox347

Member
Nov 6, 2013
48
0
7
Waukesha, Wisconsin
Nov 21, 2013
#1
  • Nov 21, 2013
  • #1
Ok so I build a 347 and I put ported gt40p heads on and I have a tfs stage 1 cam. now I want to put 1.7 ratio roller rockers so if I gave out the specs of the pistions and the heads is there anyway for me to check or calculate if the valves will hit the piston with out taking that heads back off
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Nov 21, 2013
#2
  • Nov 21, 2013
  • #2
This is something that has to be checked. How would you know if you had .001 or .100 of clearance without checking? The deck height on every block is different among other things. Check to know or cross your fingers and go, up to you
 
Reactions: liljoe07

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Nov 21, 2013
#3
  • Nov 21, 2013
  • #3
X2

Not to mention the various other things that can be off as well. There are lots of tolerances that can swing either way and stack up against you, or for you. That being said, you can do it with the heads on if you have the right tools.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 21, 2013
#4
  • Nov 21, 2013
  • #4
Better to check now that risk major damage later. As mentioned, every block and heads are different and things like
Block deck height
Head deck thickness
Head gasket thickness
Rocker arm ratio
Cam grind tolerances
Cam timing
Cam bore alignment
Main bore alignment
Crankshaft throw tolerances
Crank journal tolerances
Piston wrist pin tolerances
Connecting rod tolerances
Valve spring height
Bearing clearances
Push rod length

.... well you get the idea.... all impact PTV clearance

Method with head off- preferred

http://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tech/engine-blueprinting-how-to-check-piston-to-valve-clearance/

Method with head on

http://www.cranecams.com/faqview.php?s_id=24
 
Last edited: Nov 21, 2013

foureyefox347

Member
Nov 6, 2013
48
0
7
Waukesha, Wisconsin
Nov 22, 2013
#5
  • Nov 22, 2013
  • #5
well it looks like the heads are comin off again
 
T

tpstang

New Member
Nov 30, 2011
6
0
2
Nov 22, 2013
#6
  • Nov 22, 2013
  • #6
I have the same situation now, because I just bought a set of heads and want to run trick flow cam. ptv was the biggest question I was dealing with but gave in to pulling the engine down because it just isn't worth the risk.
 
D

Dave2000GT

Active Member
Oct 3, 2005
229
26
39
Seattle
Nov 23, 2013
#7
  • Nov 23, 2013
  • #7
I'd just let it ride, should be fine.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Nov 25, 2013
#8
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #8
Dave2000GT said:
I'd just let it ride, should be fine.
Click to expand...
You buying his valves or something? This is terrible advice!!!!
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe and Noobz347

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 25, 2013
#9
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #9
Dave2000GT said:
I'd just let it ride, should be fine.
Click to expand...

Just wow. I would say that makes the top 10 for 2013 of bad advice.

tfs1 cam that has the following specs

Duration @ .050" (degrees) - 221 intake/225 exhaust
Cam Lift (intake/exhaust) - .312"/.319"
Lift w/ 1.6 rocker (intake/exhaust) - .499"/.510"
Lobe seperation (degrees) - 112°

vs. the stock cam with the following specs
Duration @ .050 210intake /210 exhaust
Lift with 1.6 rockers 444/.444
Lobe seperation 115 degrees

So take the new lift with the 1.7 RR is
Intake (.499/1.6) x 1.7 =.530 lift
Exhaust (.510/1.6) x 1.7 = .542 lift

Although peak lift has nothing to do with PTV, the increased overlap of the cam and the RR will. With a longer duration and shorter lobe seperation . General rule of thumb is .080" on the intake side, and .100" on the exhaust side. I'd also be making sure his springs are good enough for this lift.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Nov 25, 2013
#10
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #10
mikestang63 said:
Just wow. I would say that makes the top 10 for 2013 of bad advice.

tfs1 cam that has the following specs

Duration @ .050" (degrees) - 221 intake/225 exhaust
Cam Lift (intake/exhaust) - .312"/.319"
Lift w/ 1.6 rocker (intake/exhaust) - .499"/.510"
Lobe seperation (degrees) - 112°

vs. the stock cam with the following specs
Duration @ .050 210intake /210 exhaust
Lift with 1.6 rockers 444/.444
Lobe seperation 115 degrees

So take the new lift with the 1.7 RR is
Intake (.499/1.6) x 1.7 =.530 lift
Exhaust (.510/1.6) x 1.7 = .542 lift

Although peak lift has nothing to do with PTV, the increased overlap of the cam and the RR will. With a longer duration and shorter lobe seperation . General rule of thumb is .080" on the intake side, and .100" on the exhaust side. I'd also be making sure his springs are good enough for this lift.
Click to expand...

So with the year coming to an end do we make an official Bad advice of 2013 thread? Just curious..
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 25, 2013
#11
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #11
@Noobz347 .. top 10 worst advice of 2013 thread? maybe a sticky? lol
 
Reactions: A5literMan, 90lxwhite and 84Ttop

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,906
21,083
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 25, 2013
#12
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #12
mikestang63 said:
Just wow.
Click to expand...

This ^^^

Please don't run the motor until the clearance check is performed. It seems like a pain in the ass if you've never done it before, but it's really a fairly simple procedure.



Unless... You're into pain and just wanna see what happens when things wrong.
 
D

Dave2000GT

Active Member
Oct 3, 2005
229
26
39
Seattle
Nov 25, 2013
#13
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #13
84Ttop said:
You buying his valves or something? This is terrible advice!!!!
Click to expand...
They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 26, 2013
#14
  • Nov 26, 2013
  • #14
Dave2000GT said:
They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
Click to expand...
View attachment 122138
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 26, 2013
#15
  • Nov 26, 2013
  • #15
:stick2::roast:
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Nov 26, 2013
#16
  • Nov 26, 2013
  • #16
mikestang63 said:
Click to expand...
Hehe..... All of the above!
 

foureyefox347

Member
Nov 6, 2013
48
0
7
Waukesha, Wisconsin
Nov 30, 2013
#17
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #17
mikestang63 said:
Just wow. I would say that makes the top 10 for 2013 of bad advice.

tfs1 cam that has the following specs

Duration @ .050" (degrees) - 221 intake/225 exhaust
Cam Lift (intake/exhaust) - .312"/.319"
Lift w/ 1.6 rocker (intake/exhaust) - .499"/.510"
Lobe seperation (degrees) - 112°

vs. the stock cam with the following specs
Duration @ .050 210intake /210 exhaust
Lift with 1.6 rockers 444/.444
Lobe seperation 115 degrees

So take the new lift with the 1.7 RR is
Intake (.499/1.6) x 1.7 =.530 lift
Exhaust (.510/1.6) x 1.7 = .542 lift

Although peak lift has nothing to do with PTV, the increased overlap of the cam and the RR will. With a longer duration and shorter lobe seperation . General rule of thumb is .080" on the intake side, and .100" on the exhaust side. I'd also be making sure his springs are good enough for this lift.
Click to expand...
yea im pretty sure my springs are rated for that lift and duration i got the alexs parts gt40p springs they say good for .560 lift
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 1, 2013
#18
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #18
Lmaobad advice thread would be Great!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
912
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
296
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
877
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?