• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

rocker arm question

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95stangGT
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2005
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Jun 20, 2005
#1
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #1
Is it nessesary to go through the steps in the Haynes manual for tightening the rocker arms? A mechanic friend of mine said you can just tighten them as they sit but that didn't seem right. Thanks
 

cavscout371

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
277
0
0
Jun 20, 2005
#2
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #2
Your friend is a idiot dont ever let him near your car!

Follow the directions in haynes or use these valve adjustment from fti's site
 

cavscout371

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
277
0
0
Jun 20, 2005
#3
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #3
Another way if they are already on and just getting noisy and you dont mind spilling a little oil take the valve covers off and lash them with it running.
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Jun 20, 2005
#4
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #4
cavscout371 said:
Another way if they are already on and just getting noisy and you dont mind spilling a little oil take the valve covers off and lash them with it running.
Click to expand...
Out of curiosity, how much oil are you talking about?
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 20, 2005
#5
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #5
Chythar said:
Out of curiosity, how much oil are you talking about?
Click to expand...

Just enough to make a mess. Get a set of 94/95 tin valve covers from a junkyard and cut the tops out only far enough to access the rockers. The amount of oil you spill will be almost none.

95stangGT --> The Haynes manual probably discusses pedestal mount rockers. Which type are you using?
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Jun 20, 2005
#6
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #6
SlowGT said:
Just enough to make a mess. Get a set of 94/95 tin valve covers from a junkyard and cut the tops out only far enough to access the rockers. The amount of oil you spill will be almost none.

95stangGT --> The Haynes manual probably discusses pedestal mount rockers. Which type are you using?
Click to expand...

I'm referring to just the stock ones.
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 20, 2005
#7
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #7
95stangGT said:
I'm referring to just the stock ones.
Click to expand...

The Haynes manuals are usually pretty accurate. The pedestal mounts are setup a little different than the stud mounts. They use shims and a torque spec, whereas stud mounts follow the steps ordered in the previously noted link. I'm sure you could modify that procedure for pedestal mounts also, but in the end you're still stuck with shims for adjustment, and a holddown bolt that needs to be torqued.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 20, 2005
#8
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #8
95stangGT said:
Is it nessesary to go through the steps in the Haynes manual for tightening the rocker arms? A mechanic friend of mine said you can just tighten them as they sit but that didn't seem right. Thanks
Click to expand...

Your mechanic friend is correct

Kinda Sorta

Ford made ped rockers so the workers could just bolt them on the motor as it came down the line at the factory with no checking or adjustment needed whatsoever.

The whole system of "no adjustment necessary" depends on all parts being stock, or original Ford parts. This worked ok cause Ford knew the specs on all of their own parts so that ment the valve train specs always fell within an acceptable range.

If you've milled the heads or used different head gaskets or anything like that, then you should check things for correct valve train geometry.

Later
Grady
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 20, 2005
#9
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #9
final5-0 said:
Your mechanic friend is correct

Kinda Sorta

Ford made ped rockers so the workers could just bolt them on the motor as it came down the line at the factory with no checking or adjustment needed whatsoever.

The whole system of "no adjustment necessary" depends on all parts being stock, or original Ford parts. This worked ok cause Ford knew the specs on all of their own parts so that ment the valve train specs always fell within an acceptable range.

If you've milled the heads or used different head gaskets or anything like that, then you should check things for correct valve train geometry.

Later
Grady
Click to expand...


Well put . I've had a few of those thoughts bouncing around today, but I've been running on empty since dawn and I just couldn't get them organized
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 20, 2005
#10
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #10
SlowGT said:
Well put . I've had a few of those thoughts bouncing around today, but I've been running on empty since dawn and I just couldn't get them organized
Click to expand...

I really do know where your coming from on those "organized thoughts"

Lots of times I know the answer to peeps questions

I want to help them but I have a little difficulty

in trying to figure out how to move that thought down the line to the finger tips so it makes a bit of sense on their puter screen.

Later
Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
308
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
A
Engine Genius installed oil filler above rocker arm…
  • afjLX
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
557
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2025
nicholase
Ball Joints Question
  • 93gtmustang
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
510
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
AeroCoupe
C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
258
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?