• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Roller lifter question

  • Thread starter Thread starter strtrcr50
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2008

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 5, 2008
#1
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #1
Is there an advantage to running a comp cams high energy lifter at $245 a set over running a ford racing set at $125? I don't mind spending the extra $100, but there has to be an advantage to justify the purchase. I'm trying to save some money because I need to get 6.55 pushrods now.(Trick flow heads and Harland sharp rockers) I'm interested in both performance differences and reliability differences.
Thanks Stangnet,
Rob
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Nov 5, 2008
#2
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #2
I believe the FMS ones are made by crane... There shouldn't be a noticeable difference in a street car.
Kevin
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 5, 2008
#3
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #3
I have to agree. The Comp Cams lifters can probably withstand higher spring pressures before collapsing, but the FMS ones can hold up under quite a bit. In a street application, you'd probably have a pretty hard time testing the limits of the stock/FMS lifters.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 6, 2008
#4
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #4
Here's the cam specs.. Still good with fms lifters?

Intake______Exhaust
284________290____duration
.533________.544___valve lift
114 Lobe center angle
110 Intake centerline
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 6, 2008
#5
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #5
That should be fine with the FMS lifters.
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Nov 6, 2008
#6
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #6
strtrcr50 said:
Here's the cam specs.. Still good with fms lifters?

Intake______Exhaust
284________290____duration
.533________.544___valve lift
114 Lobe center angle
110 Intake centerline
Click to expand...

Spring pressures are more telling than cam specs but as all have said you should be fine with the FMS stuff for a while. Don't be surprised if the springs in the lifters wear out though. The bodies are basically the same but the internals of the COMP lifters are better. If you plan on running this motor for a long time I would spring for the COMP's.
 

EMW150

Founding Member
May 22, 2000
2,020
1
46
Roaring Spring,PA
Nov 7, 2008
#7
  • Nov 7, 2008
  • #7
strtrcr50 said:
Here's the cam specs.. Still good with fms lifters?

Intake______Exhaust
284________290____duration
.533________.544___valve lift
114 Lobe center angle
110 Intake centerline
Click to expand...

Personally, I'd stick with the Ford Lifters. They're one tough customer. That's all I've ever run in my motors. The lifters in my 331 have seen 7,800 rpms frequently since I installed them in about 2001 without missing a beat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
592
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
431
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
960
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Y
Engine Oily cylinder- bad lifter relationship
  • Yoyoda
  • Nov 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
472
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 16, 2024
Yoyoda
Y
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?