• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Ron Morris adjustable motor mounts

  • Thread starter Thread starter shoguun
  • Start date Start date Sep 30, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

shoguun

New Member
Jul 28, 2009
184
0
0
Sep 30, 2009
#1
  • Sep 30, 2009
  • #1
Ron Morris Performance: RMP Adjustable Motor Mounts

Anyone use these motor mounts?

Just wondering that exact advantages of them?

Are they for headers or just to move the engine back and fourth or a little lower?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Oct 1, 2009
#2
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #2
I have them on my 65. I would recommend them to anyone that is doing a motor swap or a transmission conversion.

They allow you to move the motor front to back and side to side, but not up and down. RMP also offers mounts that will lower the engine and they are good for a 351 swap.

They were a big help for me. I got my 302 with T5 trans to fit just right with my headers and larger radiator etc. I moved my engine back a bit and everything fits perfectly.

I know they are a little pricey, but they are worth it in my opinion.
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Oct 1, 2009
#3
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #3
They won't fit w/o modification if you have repo HIPO manifolds. They add a little vibration. I would buy them again if doing another Stang.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Oct 1, 2009
#4
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #4
i have the tcp mounts that look just like that except they're non-adj. those would've been great to have.
 
V

Velox

New Member
May 10, 2009
19
0
0
Oct 1, 2009
#5
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #5
I put these on my 65 as I was doing a T5 conversion with JBA headers and could not get the headers to fit or the T5 to line up with the floor opening just right. These mounts allowed me to adjust the side to side and front back position perfectly. I think they do add a bit of vibration but they worked very well for me
 
M

mustangbrad

Member
Aug 16, 2004
127
5
19
Oct 1, 2009
#6
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #6
I have the lowered mounts and they are great!
 
B

Blu-Steel

Member
Dec 29, 2006
92
0
7
Waynesville, MO
Oct 1, 2009
#7
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #7
I have the mounts that adjust forward/backward/side to side. I like them a lot. I got them because the repro mounts I bought were not quite right and I could not align my engine/trans properly. The Ron Morris mounts made it very easy to shift things to fit perfectly. I had my engine balanced when I rebuilt it and it runs very smooth and I haven't noticed any engine vibrations.
 

shoguun

New Member
Jul 28, 2009
184
0
0
Oct 1, 2009
#8
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #8
should i get these if i have a 91 ho motor and im gonna do a T5 conversion
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 1, 2009
#9
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #9
I have the lowering version and it allowed me to put a T56 6 speed in my car without cutting the trans tunnel.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Oct 1, 2009
#10
  • Oct 1, 2009
  • #10
engine and transmission swaps are where they really shine

shoguun said:
should i get these if i have a 91 ho motor and im gonna do a T5 conversion
Click to expand...

Did you not read the previous posts?

Only if you really want to take the easy way to get everything to line up perfectly, should you get the RMP mounts.
If you prefer to struggle, sweat, blead, cry, scream, throw tantrums, get frustrated, get behind, chase bugs, give up, then don't get these mounts.

The biggest problem that I can see with the RMP mounts is, they work so well, that dropping in the drivetrain becomes a non-event.
What kind of bragging rights can you have when you don't even get grease under your fingernails.

Because they use polyurethane isolators, they will transmit more vibration to the chassis of the car. Most people aren't clued in enough to know the difference.
Eventually the bushings break down at the bottom (higher exhaust temps speed the process). So "eventually" you may need to change the bushings.
And if you really want to get things "just right" get both sets of side plates. If possible use the lowering plates (especially with a transmission swap).

If you are bound and determined to do things the old fashioned hard way. And you grew up walking barefoot in the snow 4 miles to school (uphill both ways), then by all means, check out the below link:

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2400202/8

In either case, have fun, and good luck.
 
B

Blu-Steel

Member
Dec 29, 2006
92
0
7
Waynesville, MO
Oct 2, 2009
#11
  • Oct 2, 2009
  • #11
shoguun said:
should i get these if i have a 91 ho motor and im gonna do a T5 conversion
Click to expand...

+1 to what 66Runt wrote. If I were in your shoes I would definately get them. With stock mounts most people find they have to trim the tunnel opening to make room for the shifter when they do a T5 swap. The adjustable mounts may make it so you will not have to. Also, Virginia Classic Mustang sells different length Radiater Fan spacers so if you have to move the engine forward any, these can keep your fan blades from hitting your radiator.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Oct 3, 2009
#12
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • #12
shoguun said:
should i get these if i have a 91 ho motor and im gonna do a T5 conversion
Click to expand...

Yes, I would.
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Oct 3, 2009
#13
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • #13
mustangbrad said:
I have the lowered mounts and they are great!
Click to expand...

I hadn't even thought of using these in my 68. But . . . after reading this thread, it looks like a near no-brainer. And, for the extra $35, may be worthwhile to have both the stock height and 1/2" lowering set on hand.

VERY glad I checked out this thread.
 

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Oct 3, 2009
#14
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • #14
Yup, I am getting me a set with both of the height sets. I was happy to hear that it will aid in installing a 6-speed should I got that way or allow better fit if I go with a 351W, great thread!


Armando
 
6

68Blue302Coupe

New Member
Jul 30, 2005
74
0
0
Fairfax, VA
Oct 3, 2009
#15
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • #15
I have the Ron Morris adjustables and think they are great. After having to really strong-arm the stock mounts, these were a nice change and installed with ease. I have the engine positioned as it would be stock, but in general these mounts are easier to work with than the stock set. About 2x as much though, but worth it IMO.
 
B

BornInAFord

Member
Apr 22, 2005
199
0
17
Bend, OR 97701
Oct 4, 2009
#16
  • Oct 4, 2009
  • #16
I have the RM mounts (put them in about 4 years ago) with JBA headers, 5.0L and T5z. It allowed me to move the engine about an inch back for the headers to clear the steering box and to move the engine side to side to get near perfect fit. I did have to grind the DS rear side an 1/8" when I was using HiPo manifolds as they would just touch and keep the manifolds from fully seating. Now, the T5z shifter is centered in the hole so I wouldn't have had to clearance the front if I had put these on in the first place. My driveshaft (aluminum) is shorter by 1 1/2" from stock (currently 49.5") BTW.

Daniel
 
M

mustangman1974

Member
Jan 17, 2004
463
0
16
Dec 20, 2009
#17
  • Dec 20, 2009
  • #17
hey runt66 which ron morris did you use to match to the early style engine mounts? lowered or standard?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Dec 21, 2009
#18
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #18
I believe that lowered mounts are for 351s. I have the standard ones and they fit great.
 

Blue1965

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
14
0
0
Idaho
Dec 21, 2009
#19
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #19
tx65coupe said:
I believe that lowered mounts are for 351s. I have the standard ones and they fit great.
Click to expand...

Do you mean for the 351w swap into a 65-66?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Dec 21, 2009
#20
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #20
Blue1965 said:
Do you mean for the 351w swap into a 65-66?
Click to expand...

Yeah, thats what I meant.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Fox *Solved* Motor mount bolt question
  • TDM389
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
244
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TDM389
T
Can makes noises when driving poping
  • Creomod
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
572
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Creomod
Motor Mount Question
  • Willybill32
  • Aug 12, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
473
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2024
nickyb
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
379
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 12:30 PM
FastDriver
B
Issue with trans mount not lining up with crossmember slots
  • Bbaker2317
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
802
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?